Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136020
|
| Title: | 聯盟多樣性、吸收能耐、與創新績效之研究
Alliance Diversity, Absorptive Capacity, and Firm Innovativeness |
| Authors: | 洪乙馨
Hung, Yi-Hsin |
| Contributors: | 黃國峯
傅浚映
洪乙馨
Hung, Yi-Hsin |
| Keywords: | 策略聯盟
聯盟多樣性
企業創新表現
吸收能耐
潛在吸收能耐
實現的吸收能耐
Strategic Alliance
Alliance Diversity
Firm Innovativeness
Absorptive Capacity
Potential Absorptive Capacity
Realized Absorptive Capacity |
| Date: | 2021 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-07-01 21:25:35 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著全球競爭不斷加劇與科技快速變化的同時，企業面臨激烈的競爭也面臨著獲利與持續成長的挑戰。如何在如此快速變動的環境下生存，並持續創新，是至關重要的議題。策略聯盟已成為企業在進行創新活動時，獲取知識、資源、競爭優勢的來源之一，但同時與眾多策略夥伴合作時，企業的風險與不穩定可能會增加。
此研究期望了解新創企業如何有效地透過吸收能耐（Absorptive Capacity）吸取多元的外部知識，來填補自身缺乏的資源，並將這些資源轉化、整合到內部系統中，更進一步激發創新，帶來更大的效益。吸收能耐是企業獲取，吸收和轉化外部知識的能力。此研究將吸收能耐細分成潛在吸收能耐（Potential Absorptive Capacity）與實現的吸收能耐（Realized Absorptive Capacity），期望探討聯盟多樣性，潛在吸收能耐與實現的吸收能耐對於提高企業創新表現之間的關聯。
本研究採用國家科學委員會於2013年所進行的「台灣地區第三次產業創新活動調查研究計畫」的問卷結果來探討聯盟多元化、企業創新表現、潛在吸收能耐與實現的吸收能耐四個構面之間的關聯。並且有了以下四個發現：一、聯盟的多樣性會對企業的創新程度有正向影響；二、潛在吸收能耐在聯盟多樣性與創新表現的路徑中扮演著部分中介角色；三、實現的吸收能耐對聯盟多樣性與創新表現扮演部分中介角色；四、潛在吸收能耐與實現的吸收能耐彼此間無直接關係。
While global competition continues to intensify and rapid technological advances, enterprises face fierce competition and challenges. Therefore, it is crucial to learn how firms can survive and create innovation under such circumstances. Firms are encouraged to continue developing innovative activities which can provide superior products or services to create competitiveness. To conduct innovative activities, firms may seek external resources to reach out for the knowledge they cannot develop independently. However, working with various alliances, firms may face risk and instability. Absorptive capacity is the ability of firms to acquire, absorb, and transform external knowledge, which can help firms work with external partners smoothly. Therefore, this study tends to discover the importance of the firm`s absorptive capacity for improving its innovativeness and expect to understand how firms can obtain resources it lacks and integrated the resources into the internal system. The research identifies absorptive capacity into two separate concepts, potential absorptive capacity and realized absorptive capacity. This research focused on discovering how potential absorptive capacity and realized absorptive capacity affect the relationship between diversified alliances and firm innovativeness. The study adopts quantitive methods based on the Third Industrial Innovation Survey in Taiwan Area (TIS 3) collected by the National Science Council.
The analysis suggests that (1) the degree of alliance diversity will positively affect the firm`s innovation performance; (2) potential absorptive capacity partially mediates the relationship between alliance diversity and firm innovativeness; (3) realized absorptive capacity plays a partially mediates role in the relationship between alliance diversity and firm innovativeness; (4) there is no correlation between potential absorptive capacity and realized absorptive capacity. |
| Reference: | Aliasghar, O., Rose, E. L., & Chetty, S. (2019). ‘Building absorptive capacity through firm openness in the context of a less-open country’. Industrial Marketing Management, 82,199-212.
Andreeva, T. and Kianto, A. (2012). ‘Does knowledge management really matter? Linking knowledge management practices, competitiveness and economic performance’. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(4), 617-636.
Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, José L. Roldán, José A. Ariza-Montes, Antonio Leal-Millán. (2014). ‘From potential absorptive capacity to innovation outcomes in project teams: The conditional mediating role of the realized absorptive capacity in a relational learning context’. International Journal of Project Management, 32(6), 894-907.
Ari, J. (2005). ‘Knowledge – processing capabilities and innovative performance: an empirical study’. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3): 336-349.
Asakawa, K., Nakamura, H., & Sawada, N. (2010). ‘Firms` open innovation policies, la- boratories` external collaborations, and laboratories` R&D performance’. R&D Management, 40(2), 109-123.
Barney, J. (1991). ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’. Journal of Management, 17, 771–792.
Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). ‘The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Belderbos R, Carree M, Lokshin B. (2004). ‘Cooperative R&D and firm performance’. Research Policy, 33(10):1477-92.
Bierly, P. E., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. D. (2009). The application of external knowledge: organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 481-509.
Brockhoff K. (2003). ‘Customers` perspectives of involvement in new product development’. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(5/6):464-81.
Caloghirou Y, Kastelli I, Tsakanikas A. (2004). Internal capability and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?’. Technovation, 24(1):29-39.
Cepeda-Carrión, G., Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., Leal-Millán, A. (2012). ‘Finding the hospital-in-the-home units` innovativeness’. Management Decision, 50(9), 1596-1617.
Chen, C.-J. (2004). The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management. 34 (3), 311-321.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning an innovation’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Damanpour, F. (1991). ‘Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators’. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
Darroch, J., R. McNaughton. (2003). ‘Beyond market orientation: knowledge management and the innovativeness of New Zealand firms’. European Journal of Marketing, 37(3/4): 572-593.
Das T, Teng B. (2000). ‘A resource-based theory of strategic alliances’. J Manage, 26(1):31-61.
Daspit, J.J. and D’Souza, D.E. (2013). ‘Understanding the multi-dimensional nature of absorptive capacity’. Journal of Managerial Issues, 25(3), 299.
Davenport, TH. and Prusak, L. (1998) ‘Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know’. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
De Leeuw, T., Lokshin, B., Duysters, G. (2014). ‘Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: the relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity’. Journal of Business Research. 67(9), 1839-1849.
Deeds, D. L. and Hill, C. W. L. (1996). ‘Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: an empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms’. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 41-55.
Donate, M.J. and Guadamillas, F. (2011), ‘Organizational factors to support knowledge management and innovation’. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 890-914.
Duchek, S. (2013). ‘Capturing absorptive capacity: a critical review and future prospects’, Schmalenbach Business Review, 65(3), 312-329.
Fiol, C.M. (1996). ‘Squeezing harder doesn`t always work: continuing the search for consistency in innovation research’. Academy of Management Review. 21, 1012-1021.
Gambardella, A. (1992). ‘Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: The US pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s’. Research Policy, 21, 391-407.
George, G., Zahra, S.A., and Wood, D.R. (2002). ‘The effects of business-University alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies’. Journal of business Venturing, 17(6): 557-570.
Grant, R.M. (1996). ‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm’. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 109-122.
Guisado-Gonza ́lez, M., Gonza ́lez-Blanco, J. and Coca-Pe ́rez, J.L. (2017). ‘Analyzing the relationship between exploration, exploitation and organizational innovation’. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1142-1162.
Huang, K.F. (2017). Antecedents for Forming Simultaneous Alliances or One-by-One Alliances. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(1), 73-101.
Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W. (2005). ‘Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?’. The Academy of Management Journal, 48, 999-1015.
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). ‘Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction’. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
Kenny, A. David (2016). Mediation. Retreived from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate. htm.
Kleinknecht, A. and Reijnen, J. O. N. (1992). ‘Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study’. Research Policy, 21, 347-360.
Köhler, C., Sofka, W., & Grimpe, C. (2012). ‘Selective search, sectoral patterns, and the impact on product innovation performance’. Research Policy, 41(8), 1344-1356.
Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M. and Ioannou, G. (2011), ‘Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance’. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335-1343.
Kotabe, M. and Swan, K. S. (1995). ‘The role of strategic alliances in high-technology new product development’. Strategic Management Journal, 16(8), 621-636.
Kuen-Hung Tsai, Ming-Hung Hsieh, (2009). ‘How different types of partners influence innovative product sales: Does technological capacity matter?’. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1321-1328.
Lane, P.J. and Lubatkin, M. (1998). ‘Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning’. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477.
Langerak F, Hultink EJ, Robben HSJ. (2004). ‘The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance’. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(1):79-94.
Laursen, K., Salter, A. (2006). ‘Open for innovation: the roles of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms’. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
Lee, C., Lee, K. and Pennings, J. M. (2001). ‘Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures’. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 615-640.
Leiponen, A. (2005). ‘Skills and innovation’. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 303-323.
Levinthal, D., and March, J. G. (1981). ‘A model of adaptive organizational search’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2(4), 307-333.
Lin R, Zhang H, Fan J, Hou R. (2012). Alliance network and innovation: Evidence from China`s third generation mobile communications industry. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 6 (2): 197-222.
Lin, J.-Y. (2014). ‘Effects on diversity of R&D sources and human capital on industrial performance’. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 168-184.
Moses, D. O. (1992). ‘Organizational slack and risk-taking behavior: Tests of product pricing strategy’. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5, 38-54.
Motohashi K. (2004). ‘Economic analysis of university–industry collaborations: the role of new technology based firms in Japanese national innovation reform’. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 04-E-001:1-16.
Muscio, A. (2007). ‘The impact of absorptive capacity on SME’s collaboration’. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 16, 653-668.
Omid Aliasghar, Elizabeth L. Rose, Sylvie Chetty, (2019). ‘Where to search for process innovations? The mediating role of absorptive capacity and its impact on process innovation’. Industrial Marketing Management, 82, 199-212.
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (1997). ‘The measurement of scientific and technological activities’. Paris: The Oslo Manual.
Powell, W.W., Kogut, K.W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-45.
Ritter T, Gemunden HG. (2003). ‘Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents’. Journal of Business Research, 56(9):745-55.
Roberto Grandinetti (2016). ‘Absorptive capacity and knowledge management in small and medium enterprises’. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 14:2, 159-168.
Rothaermel, F. T. (2001). ‘Complementary Assets, Strategic Alliances, and the Incumbent’s Advantage: An Empirical Study of Industry and Firm Effects in the Biopharmaceutical Industry’. Research Policy, 30, 1235-1251.
Sampson, R. C. (2007). ‘R&D alliance and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation’. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 364-386.
Sasson, J.R. and Douglas, I. (2006). ‘A conceptual integration of performance analysis, knowledge management, and technology: from concept to prototype’. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(6), 81-99.
Scherer, F. M. (1965). ‘Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions’. American Economic Review, 319-340.
Schiuma, G. (2012). ‘Managing knowledge for business performance improvement’, Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(4), 515-522.
Se-hua Wu. (2013). The Third Industrial Innovation Survey in Taiwan Area. (E99035) [Data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Center for Survey Research, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica Web site: https:// srda.sinica.edu.tw. doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA- E99035-1
Shan, W., Walker, G., and Kogut, B. (1994). ‘Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry’. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 387-394.
Soosay, C. A., Hyland, P. W., & Ferrer, M. (2008). ‘Supply chain collaboration: Capabilities for continuous innovation’. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(2), 160-169.
Spencer JW. (2003). ‘Firms` knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry’. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3):217-33.
Symth, D. J., Boyes, W. J., and Pessau, D. E. (1975). ‘The measurement of firm size: Theory and evidence for the United States and United Kingdom’. Review of Economics and Statistics, 57(1), 111-114.
Teece, D. J. (1992). ‘Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation. Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18, 1-25.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Todorova, G., B. Durisin. (2007). ‘Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization’. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 774-786.
Vuola O, Hameri AP. (2006). ‘Mutually benefiting joint innovation process between industry and big-science’. Technovation, 26(1):3-12.
Yang H, Zheng Y, Zhao X. (2014). Exploration or exploitation Small firms` alliance strategies with large firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35 (1): 146-157.
黃國峯，2019-2022，「新創事業成長策略之研究：資源取得、吸收能力、與管理決策」，科技部一百零八年度專題研究計畫主持人。(科技部專題研究計畫，編號：MOST 108-2410-H-004 -134 -SS3)。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
108363013 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108363013 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100537 |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 301301.pdf | | 1491Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
