政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/135914

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/135914

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51588988 線上人數 : 776

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/135914

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135914

題名:	CEO股權與薪酬對目標公司採取反併購措施與績效之關聯性 Are CEO Compensation and Ownership Associated with Antitakeover Defenses?
作者:	施榮甫 Shih, Rong-Fu
貢獻者:	翁嘉祥 Weng, CHia-Hsiang 施榮甫 Shih, Rong-Fu
關鍵詞:	CEO薪酬與股權管理防禦反併購措施目標公司 CEO compensation and ownership Entrenchment Antitakeover measures Target companies
日期:	2021
上傳時間:	2021-07-01 16:54:39 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究透過SDC資料庫蒐集美國上市的目標公司於1990-2014年間發生的併購事件為樣本，將目標公司分類為有採取反併購措施及沒有採取反併購措施，於Execucomp中搜尋目標公司CEO的薪酬資料與持股比例，再從Compustat蒐集目標公司的財務資訊，最後使用CRSP的事件研究法蒐集目標公司在併購宣告前後之不同期間持有股票的異常報酬。本研究實證結果發現:目標公司CEO薪資報酬與股權報酬佔總薪酬比例較高時，面對主併公司併購時，較不願採取反併購措施，獎金佔總報酬高的CEO則傾向進行反併購措施，但結果並不顯著。有持股的CEO較不願意進行反併購措施，而持股的比例並無顯著影響CEO是否進行反併購措施。反併購措施在2日與30日及180日對於目標公司之併購績效有顯著的正面影響，雖於60日與90日有正面影響，但效果並不顯著，顯示反併購措施在短期及長期效果較大。 In this study, the SDC database was used to collect a sample of M&A events of U.S.-listed target companies from 1990-2014, the target companies were categorized into those with and without anti-merger measures, searched the compensation information and shareholding ratio of CEOs of target companies in Execucomp, collected financial information of target companies from Compustat.Finally, used CRSP`s event study method to collect the abnormal returns of the target company`s stock holdings between the pre- and post-merger announcement periods. The empirical results of this study revealed that: CEOs with a higher ratio of salary to total compensation are more reluctant to take antitakeover measures in the face of a merger with the acquiring company, while those with a higher ratio of bonus to total compensation tend to take antitakeover measures, but the results are not significant. CEOs with shareholdings are less likely to engage in antitakeover measures, and the percentage of shareholdings do not significantly affect whether CEOs engaged in antitakeover measures. Antitakeover measures have a significant positive effect on the performance of target companies at 2 days, 30 days and 180 days, but not at 60 days and 90 days, indicating that antitakeover measures have a greater effect in the short and long term.
參考文獻:	中文部分王淑芬與黃昭華(2010), 白衣武士、敵意併購與股東利益, 臺大管理論叢,第21卷第1期:113-136 英文部分 Antounian,C.,Dah,M.A. and Harakeh,M.(2021), Excessive managerial entrenchment, corporate governance, and firm performance, Research in International Business and Finance,56,101-392 Agrawal,A. and Knoeber,C.R.(1998), Managerial compensation and the threat of takeover, Journal of Financial Economics,47(2),219-239 Bebchuk,L.A. and Fried,J.M.(2003), Executive Compensation as an Agency Proble, Journal of Economic Perspectives,17(3),71-92 Bebchuk,L.A. and Fried,J.M.(2004), Stealth Compensation Via Retirement Benefits, Nber Working Paper Serirs ,10742 Bebchuk,L., Alma Cohen,A.and Ferrell,A.(2009), What Matters in Corporate Governance, The Review of Financial Studies ,22(2),783- 827 Hermalin,B.E. and Weisbach,M.S.(1991), The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance, Financial Management , Winter, 1991, 20(4),101-112 Borokhovich,K.A.,Brunarski,K.R. and Parrino,R.(1997),CEO Contracting and Antitakeover Amendments.The Journal of Finance,52(4),1495-1517 Carroll ,C., Griffith,J.M. and Rudolph,P.M.(1999), Hostile-vs.-White-Knight Bidders, Managerial and Decision Economics ,20(3), 163-171 Chang,X. and Zhang,H.F.(2015), Managerial Entrenchment and Firm Value: A Dynamic Perspective, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis ,50(5),1083-1103 Chen,H.,Hexter,J.L. and Hu,M.Y.(1993), Management Ownership and Corporate Value, Managerial and Decision Economics ,14(4),335-346 Coombs,J.E. and Gilley,K.M.(1990), Stakeholder Management As a Predictor Of CEO Compensation: Main Effects And Interactions With Financial Performance, Strategic Management Journal,26,827-840 DeAngelo1,H. and Rice1,E.M.(1983),Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth, Journal of Financial Economics ,11(1-4),329-359 Dittmar ,A. and J Mahrt-Smith,J.(2007), Corporate governance and the value of cashholdings, Journal of Financial Economics,83(3),599-634 Frydman,C. and Jenter,D.(2010), CEO Compensation, Annual Review of Financial Economics , 2010, 2 ,75-102 Gompers,P.,Ishii,J. and Metrick,A.(2003), Corporate Governance And Equity Price, Quarterly Journal of Economics,118,55-107. Jarrell,G.A. and Poulsen,A.B.(1987), Shark repellents and stock prices: The effects of antitakeover amendments since 1980, Journal of Financial Economics 19(1),127-168 Jensen,M.C. and Meckling,W.H.(1976),Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics,3(4), 305-360 Jensen,M.C. and Ruback,R.S. (1983), The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence ,Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4),5-50 Jensen,M.C. and Murphy,K.J.(1990), Performance pay and top-management incentives, Journal of Political Economy,98(2),225- 264 Kadyrzhanova,D. and Rhodes-Kropf,M.(2011), Concentrating on Governance, The Journal of Finance,66(5),1649-1685 Klock,M.S., Mansi,S.A., and Maxwel,W.F.(2005), Does Corporate Governance Matter to Bondholders?, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis ,40(4),693-719 Knoeber,CR.(1986), Golden Parachutes, Shark Repellents, and Hostile Tender Offers, The American Economic Review, 76(1), 155- 167 Mahoney, J.M., Sundaramurthy,C.and Mahoney,J.T.(1996), The differential impact on stockholder wealth of various antitakeover provisions, Managerial and Decesion Economics,17,531-549 Mahoney,J.M.,Sundaramurthy,C. and Mahoney,J.T.(1997), The Effects of Corporate Antitakeover Provisions on Long-Term Investment: Empirical Evidence, Managerial and Decision Economics ,18(5),349-365 Manne,H.G.(1965), Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control, Journal of Political Economy ,73(2),110- 120 McConnell,J.J. and Servaes,H.(1990), Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value, Journal of Financial Economics,27(2),595-612 Mehran,H.(1995), Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance, Journal of Financial Economics,38(2),163-184 Schoenberg,R. and Thorton(2006), The Impact of Bid Defences in Hostile Acquisitions, European Management Journal,24(2-3),142-150 Smith, Jr.C.W and Watts,R.L(1992), The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies, Journal of Financtal Economics 32,263-192 Stein,J.C.(1988), Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopi, Journal of Political Economy ,96(1) ,61-80 Stulz,M.(1988), Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control, Journal of Financial Economics,20,25-54 Straska,M. and Waller,G.(2010), Do antitakeover provisions harm shareholders, Journal of Corporate Finance,16(4),487-497 Straska,M. and Waller,H.G.(2014), Antitakeover Provisions and Shareholder Wealth: A Survey of the Literature, The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , 49(4),933-956 Sundaramurthy,C.(1996), Corporate Governance Within The Context of Antitakeover Provisions, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 377-394 Tallman,S. and Li,J.(1996), Effects of International Diversity and Product Diversity on the Performance of Multinational Firms, The Academy of Management Journal , 39(1),179-196 Tosi,H.L.,Werner,S.,Katz,J.P. and Gomez-Mejia,L.R.(2000), How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies, Journal of Management,26(2),301-339
描述:	碩士國立政治大學會計學系 108353021
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108353021
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202100607
顯示於類別:	[會計學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
302101.pdf		1796Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋