政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/132673
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51052924      線上人數 : 891
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132673


    題名: 臺北再生計畫中的政治論述：初階的葛蘭西霸權
    Political Discourses in Taipei City`s Urban Revival Plans: Symbolic Hegemony in Formation
    作者: 方孝謙
    Fong, Shiaw-Chian
    貢獻者: 新聞學研究
    關鍵詞: 臺北市 ; 再生計畫 ; 政治論述 ; 葛蘭西霸權 ; 概念隱喻 
    conceptual metaphor ; Gramscian hegemony ; political discourse ; revival plan ; Taipei City
    日期: 2019-07
    上傳時間: 2020-11-18 15:06:02 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 臺北市府在2015年提出的「2050願景」計畫，引發明顯的問題：一個超過30年的都市規劃如何說服市民接受它？為回答這一問題，我們打算利用「論述分析」方法中有關葛蘭西霸權和政治論述的討論作為工具，針對「2050願景」的任務之一，「北市各大區域都市再生計畫」至今建檔的三個子計畫進行探討。探討結果發現，一方面在子計畫中市府的論述欠缺對長期規劃之價值、目標及行動宣示的內容鋪演，另一方面各行政區的區民卻以口頭質詢或書面方式大致表達支持，因為彼此的言論存在透過實踐規劃以「致富民眾」的共識，即官民共享了孳孳為利的根本「常識」。
    The Taipei City Government proposed ＂Vision 2050 of Taipei＂ in 2015 as a long-term urban revival plan. It thus raises a critical question: How will it be fine-tuned to gear with citizens` changing needs? To answer this question, we apply the notions of political discourse and Gramscian hegemony and analyze the three district-level revival sub-plans of ＂Vision 2050＂. By reducing the government`s persuasion and citizens` responses to the analytical relations among value, goal, circumstance, means, and action claim (categories taken from the political discourse literature), we find that citizens on the whole will rally round the government`s plans, even if these plans suffer from elaborating upon their own values, goals, and action claims. They will positively endorse these plans, primarily because they share with the officials the same conceptual metaphor, i.e., to enrich the people, which becomes the fundamental consensus between the rulers and the ruled. Not all citizens, however, sing the same tune. Those community workers among them do have an alternative plan that focuses exclusively on the value, the goal, and the means for preserving the urban historical heritages. Their plan constitutes a breach of the otherwise completely closed discourse of the government. It therefore prevents the government`s agenda from realizing a sweeping Gramscian hegemony.
    關聯: 新聞學研究, 140, 81-125
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.201907_(140).0003
    DOI: 10.30386/MCR.201907_(140).0003
    顯示於類別:[新聞學研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    3.pdf1015KbAdobe PDF2164檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋