English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51574368      Online Users : 937
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131420


    Title: 從「大學以教學為目的」之憲法意涵論畢業條件的「品字標準」：以最高行政法院107年判字第488號政大英檢門檻案為中心
    Proposing the “Pin”-character Criteria of Degree Requirements Based on the Constitutional Significance of “Universities’ Purpose is Teaching”: A Focus on the Highest Administrative Court Judgment No. 107-Pan-488 on National Chengchi University’s English Benchmark for Graduation
    Authors: 何萬順
    Her, One-Soon
    林俊儒
    林昆翰
    Contributors: 語言所
    Keywords: 大學自治;英檢畢業門檻;畢業條件;釋字第 563 號
    university autonomy;English benchmark for graduation;conditions for a university degree;Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 563
    Date: 2019-11
    Issue Date: 2020-09-02 09:17:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在國立政治大學英外語檢定門檻案中，最高行政法院107年判字第488號判決提 出「大學以教學為目的」做為畢業條件是否逾越釋字第563號「合理及必要範圍」 的判斷準則。本文以此為論證前提，從《憲法》第11條詮釋畢業條件的《憲法》意 涵，揭示大學所制定之畢業條件首先須在「合理及必要之範圍」通過「大學以教學 為目的」的檢驗，並符合「內容應合理妥適」及「章則訂定及執行自應遵守正當程 序」這兩個平行要件；前者為上位概念，因而與後二者在階序上建構出一個「品」 字圖形的法理標準，且彰顯出大學在教學品質與教育品格上的責任。本文並循此框 架重新檢驗最高行政法院107年判字第488號判決。在政策意涵上，大學應以本文所 建構之「品字標準」審慎檢驗其畢業條件，教育部等主管機關於制定教育政策時亦 應參照此一準繩。
    In the case against National Chengchi University’s English benchmark for graduation, the Highest Administrative Court Judgment No. 107-Pan-488 draws on “universities’ purpose is teaching” as a guideline to determine whether a specific requirement for a university degree violates the condition “to the extent reasonable and necessary” set by the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 563. Under this premise, this paper further interprets Article 11 of the Constitution in relation to the qualifications and conditions for a university degree. We conclude that any such requirement must first pass the test “universities’ purpose is teaching” and thus be “to the extent reasonable and necessary”, and then meet two additional parallel conditions: “its content must be reasonable and appropriate” and “the enactment and enforcement of the regulations and rules must follow due process of law”. The former and the latter two thus form a constitutional hierarchy of the shape of the 品 “pin” character, which also incidentally highlights a university’s responsibility on the quality and character of the education it provides. The paper then employs this legal framework to critically examine the several decisions in the Highest Administrative Court Judgment No. 107-Pan-488. In terms of policy implications, universities should apply the “pin”-character standard established in this study to scrutinize their degree requirements, and the competent authorities such as the MOE should likewise consult this standard in implementing educational policies.
    Relation: 教育政策論壇, 22:4, 1-22
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982019112204001
    DOI: 10.3966/156082982019112204001
    Appears in Collections:[語言學研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    92.pdf5031KbAdobe PDF2202View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback