政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131387
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51599669      在线人数 : 939
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 傳播博士班 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/131387


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131387


    题名: 網絡社會的身體部署：探究「數位青年」的網絡具身行動
    Dispositif of Body in the Networked Society: Exploring Embodied Online Actions of the “Digital Youth”
    作者: 王喆
    Wang, Zhe
    贡献者: 陳百齡
    Chen, Pai-lin
    王喆
    Wang, Zhe
    关键词: 具身性
    行動者
    技術哲學
    網絡行動
    能供性
    社群媒體
    Embodiment
    Actors
    Philosophy of technology
    Online actions
    Affordances
    Social media
    日期: 2020
    上传时间: 2020-08-03 18:49:34 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 網絡社會中，網絡作為基礎設施將人與人連結在一起，而身體作為人的物質基礎，可與網絡相連，形成人與技術的連結。生活在網絡社會的「母體」之中，人會經驗何種變化？新媒體研究中較為主流的觀點，傾向於認為計算機技術的去身體化、以及遠程監控造成了對「肉身」的直接取代，而網絡行動中的滑鼠點擊、按贊或實時分享被認為無法與線下集體行動相提並論，集體行動中的「實體團結」極為重視個體和群體在時空上的接近性。但在近年的網絡行動中開始出現新的「行動劇目」，新的行動主體「數位青年」也隨之走到了聚光燈下。
    網絡行動的現實觀察和理論困境之間充滿張力，本研究立足於「具身性」的相關概念群，來觀察技術、身體和行動之間的關係，嘗試透過文獻梳理來論證「數位青年」和「網絡具身行動」這兩個概念的適用性，以幫助本研究進行聚焦，並在此基礎上提出了「技術入身」、「共做實踐」和「身體交錯」三層分析框架。在網絡社會中，數位青年的身體本身在網絡行動中起到了非常重要的作用，而在網絡行動中所體認到的行動意義和對他人的感知，也是透過身體的經驗和相對應的網絡行動方式而形成的。本研究以「身體速寫」的研究方法蒐集資料，包括站姐、遊戲玩家和短視頻內容主的日常實踐，以及「超越杯編程大賽」這一網絡行動中參與者的經驗感受，藉此考察數位青年如何感知、觀察、重組、運行自己的網絡化身體，並經由和他人一起行動而重新將自己的主體性與他人的主體性進行連結，繼而生成關於技術、自我和他人的意義動態過程。本研究發現在網絡社會中，數位青年的存在很難簡單還原到「肉身」或「技術」任何一端，而是持續身處於「顯身/隱身」、「控制/創造」、「錨定/延異」之間的二元調校狀態。本研究認為，「具身性」的進路將反思如何「做」傳播學研究，提供不同於單從技術角度或行為角度出發的實踐空間。
    As a certain kind of infrastructure, the network connects people together in a network society. While the body is also a basic material for human being, which can be connected to the network, strengthening the tie between human and technology. Living in the matrix of a network society, what changes will human beings experience? The dominating approaches in our new media studies tend to believe that the disembodiment and remote surveillance are directly replacing the “body”, while the clicking, liking and sharing in online actions cannot be equated with offline collective actions. Moreover, the factual unity in the collective actions is merely about being together in the same time and at the same space. However, there are some new digital repertoires employed in online actions recent years, and actors who appeared in spotlight during these actions are digital youths.
    For these dilemmas between theories and realities, this study hopes to come back to the idea of “embodiment”, to explore the relationship between technologies, bodies and actions. Based on the literature reviews, this study proposes the applicability of two notions of “digital youth” and “embodied online actions”, also constructs a three levels analysis framework of “technology incorporation”, “connective practice”, and “bodies interlace”. In a network society, human bodies are still meaningful: the meaning realized in the actions and how we perceive the others are through our body experiences or the digital repertoires we choose. For research method, this study suggests a method named “body sketch” to collect materials, including the daily media practices of “fans leaders”, online game players, and creators of meme videos, as well as the embodied experiences of the actors who engaged in an online actions named as “programming contests for Chaoyue”. By doing so, this study probes into how people perceive, observe, rearrange and move their own networked body. By taking actions with others, people may connect their subjectivities with others’ subjectivities, and this interrelationship will generate the meanings of technology, identity and others. It reveals that the being of digital youths cannot be simply reduced to “flesh” or “technology”, but it is in the middle of calibrating the “present/absent”, “control/create”, and “anchor/diffêrance”. Overall, this study proposes an approach of “embodiment” to take a reflect on how to do communication studies, hoping to provide a refreshing perspective that is neither from technology determinism nor behaviorism.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻部分
    王喆（2016）。〈「今晚我們都是帝吧人」：作為情感化遊戲的網絡民族主義〉。《國際新聞界》，第11期，頁56-71。
    王宜燕（2012）。〈閱聽人研究實踐轉向理論初探〉。《新聞學研究》，第113期，頁39-75。
    王承緒譯（1990）。《民主主義與教育》。北京：人民教育出版社。（原書：Dewey, J. [1955]. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: MacMillan.）
    王圓圓譯（2010）。《人類身體史和現代性》。上海：上海文藝出版社。（原書Le Breton, D. [2003]. Anthropologie du corps et modernité. Paris, FR: Presses Universitaires de France.）
    王寶泉譯（2010）。《群體的智慧：如何做出最聰明的決定》。北京：中信出版社。（原書James, S. [2005]. The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Anchor Books.）
    王洪喆、李思閔、吳靖（2016）。〈從「迷妹」到「小粉紅」：新媒介商業文化環境下的國族身份生產和動員機制研究〉。《國際新聞界》，第11期，頁33-53。
    江飛（2017）。〈場景研究：虛擬民族誌的邏輯原點〉。《學海》，第2期，頁130-135。
    朱麗麗（2016）。〈網絡迷群的社會動員與情感政治〉。《南京社會科學》，第8期，頁103-109。
    朱麗麗（2018）。《數字青年：一種文化研究的新視角》。南京: 江蘇人民出版社。
    企鵝智庫數據中心（2017/8/17）。《95後報告：未來消費主力的今日喜好》。取自https://wj.qq.com/article/single-170.html
    字節跳動平台責任研究中心（2019/9/16）。《短視頻平台上的創意勞動者》。取自http://www.sohu.com/a/341080561_179557
    汪民安編（2016）。《自我技術：福柯文選III》。北京：北京大學出版社。
    汪民安、陳永國編（2003）。《後身體：文化、權力和生命政治學》。吉林：吉林人民出版社。
    何道寬譯（2003）。《交流的無奈：傳播思想史》。北京：華夏出版發行。（原書Peters, J. D. [1999]. Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press. ）
    何文忠譯（2015）。《我們賴以生存的隱喻》。杭州：浙江大學出版社。（原書Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. [1980]. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.）
    車致新（2019）。《媒介技術話語的譜系：基特勒思想研究》。北京：北京大學出版社。
    李滿（2018/12/06）。〈三流站姐回憶錄：我的追星之路是如何走到盡頭的〉。取自https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2712861
    李康譯（2011）。《文化、技術與社會中的身體》。北京：北京大學出版社。（原書Shilling, C. [2005]. The body in culture technology and society. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.）
    吳暢暢（2012）。〈去鄰避化、素樸的自由主義與中產階級的「表演式書寫」——以「7·23」動車事故為例〉，《新聞學研究》，第112期，頁159-200。
    吳暢暢（2018/07/17）。〈偶像養成與粉絲經濟的再度崛起〉，取自https://www.sohu.com/a/241768258_232950
    吳志遠（2018）。〈離散的認同：網絡社會中現代認同重構的技術邏輯〉，《國際新聞界》，第11期，頁112-134。
    彤雅立、黃鈺娟譯（2014）。《給米蓮娜的信》。上海：上海文藝出版社。（原書 Kafka, F. [1992]. Letters to Milena. New York, NY: Vintage Classics.）
    周逵、劉菁荊譯（2014）。《群體性孤獨：為什麼我們對科技期待更多，對彼此卻不能更親密？》。杭州：浙江人民出版社。（原書Turkle, S. [2011]. Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.）
    姜志輝譯（2001）。《知覺現象學》。北京：商務印書館。（原書Merleau-Ponty, M. [1962]. Phenomenology of perception. New York, NY: Humanities Press.）
    倪梁康（1994）。《現象學及其效應：胡塞爾與當代德國哲學》。北京：三聯書店。
    莫偉民譯（2001）。《詞與物：人文科學考古學》。上海：上海三聯。（原著Foucault, M. [1966]. Les mots et les choses: Une archeologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.）
    夏鑄九、王志弘譯（2001）。《信息時代三部曲：經濟、社會與文化》。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。（原書Castells, M. [1996]. The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, Inc.）
    高博譯（2013）。《信息簡史》。北京：人民郵電出版社。（原書Gleick, J. [2011]. The information: A history, a theory, a flood. New York, NY: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.）
    高芳芳譯（2017）。《參與的勝利：網絡時代的參與文化》。杭州：浙江大學出版社。（原書 Jenkins, J., Ito, H., & boyd M. [2015]. Participatory culture in a networked era, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.）
    時昱、沈德賽（2018）。〈當代中國青年社會參與現狀、問題與路徑分析〉，《中國青年研究》，第5期，頁5-38。
    孫瑋（2018）。〈交流者的身體：傳播與在場——意識主體、身體-主體、智能主體的演變〉，《國際新聞界》，第12期，頁83-103。
    孫和平譯（2008）。〈第二個和第三個身體，或者：成為一隻蝙蝠或住在另一個星球上會是什麼情景〉，《傳媒、計算機、實在性：真實性表象和新媒體》（頁135-140）。北京：中國社會科學文獻出版社。（原書：Kramer, S. [1998]. Medien computer realitat. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag）
    翁秀琪（2001）。〈民意與大眾傳播研究的結合〉,《大眾傳播理論與實証》（修定二版，頁195-214），台北：三民。
    郭佩宜（2014）。〈共做的「同理心」：重反/返所羅門群島Langalanga礁湖區的田野工作〉。劉婓玟、朱瑞玲編，《同理心、情感與互為主體：人類學與心理學的對話》（頁19-47）。台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。
    曹家榮（2012）。《理解行動電話：流動的媒介與日常生活》。國立政治大學社會學研究所博士論文。
    馮仕政（2013）.《西方社會運動理論研究》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
    張放（2017）。《想象的互動：網絡人際傳播中的印象形成》。北京：北京大學出版社。
    張嬙（2010）。《粉絲力量大》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
    張君玫譯（2010）。《猿猴、賽伯格和女人：重新發明自然》。台北：群學出版有限公司。（原書Haraway, D. J. [1991]. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.）
    張惠萍（2003）。《網際網路的隱喻分析：運用概念合成理論的初探性研究》。台灣政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    張連海（2015）。〈感官民族誌：理論、實踐與表徵〉，《民族研究》，第2期，頁55-67。
    崔時英（2004）。《理性的儀式：文化、協調與共通認知》，張慧芝、謝孝宗譯。台北：桂冠。（原書Chwe, M. S-Y. [2001]. Rational ritual: Culture, coordination, and common knowledge. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.）
    陸斗細（2018）。《圍觀式政治參與：中國網絡參政的深層透視》。湖南師範大學博士論文。
    陸元昶譯（2004）。《解放的速度》。南京：江蘇人民出版社。（原書Virilio, P. [1995], La vitesse de liberation. Paris, France: Galilée.）
    陸曄、郭中實（2007）。〈媒介素養的「賦權」作用：從人際溝通到媒介參與意向〉，《新聞學研究》，第92期，頁1-36。
    梁永熾、梁靖雯、趙蒙暘（2014）。〈新媒體與青少年研究〉。洪浚浩編，《傳播學新趨勢》（上冊，頁433-458）。北京：清華大學出版社。
    陳天虹, 胡泳（2018）。〈文化針灸模式的粉絲行動主義〉，《新聞愛好者》，第8期，頁30-32。
    陳重亨譯（2015）。《鍵盤參與時代來了》。台北：時報出版。（原書boyd, D. (2014). It`s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, Conneti.: Yale University Press.）
    賀麟、王玖興譯（1979），《精神現象學》（上卷）。北京：商務印書館。（原書：Hegel, G. W. F.[1807]. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Berlin, German: Bamberg und Würzburg）
    黃旦（2012）。〈「傳播」的想像？兼評中國內地傳播學本土化之路徑〉。馮應謙、黃懿慧編，《華人傳播想像》（頁75-99）。香港：香港中文大學亞太所。
    黃厚銘、林意仁（2013）。〈流動的群聚（mob-ility）：網路起鬨的社會心理基礎〉。《新聞學研究》，第115期，頁1-50。
    黃上銓（2016）。《婉君妳好嗎？給覺醒鄉民的PTT進化史》。新北市：群學出版有限公司。
    黃守義譯（2012）。《網絡社會的概念：科技、經濟、政治與認同》。台北：韋伯。（原書Barney, D. [2004]. The network society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.）
    黃淑琳（2013）。《行禮如儀——探討Facebook互動儀式鏈與互動策略》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    程巍譯（2019）。《在群中：數位媒體時代的大眾心理學》。北京：中信出版集團。（原書韓炳哲 [2013]. Im Schwarm: Ansichten des Digitalen. Berlin, GE: Matthes & Seitz.）
    彭蘭（2019）。〈移動互聯網時代的「現場」與「在場」〉。《湖南師範大學社會科學學報》，第3期，頁142-148。
    楊國斌（2013）。《連線力：中國網民在行動》。桂林：廣西師範大學出版社。
    端媒體（2016/02/03）。〈我翻牆，因為我愛國——「小粉紅」自述「遠征」Facebook行動 〉。取自
    https://theinitium.com/article/20160203-mainland-little-pink/
    蔡錚雲（1995）。《從現象學到後現代》。台北：唐山。
    潘忠黨、劉於思（2017）。〈訪談潘忠黨：以何為「新」?「新媒體」話語中的權力陷阱與研究者的理論自省〉。《新聞與傳播評論》，春夏卷，頁2-19。
    劉漢波（2017）。〈表情包文化：權力轉換下的身體述情和身份建構〉。《雲南社會科學》，第1期，頁180-185。
    劉海龍（2018）。〈傳播中的身體問題與傳播研究的未來〉。《國際新聞界》，第2期，頁37-46。
    劉海龍、束開榮（2019）。〈具身性與傳播研究的身體觀念——知覺現象學與認知科學的視角〉。《蘭州大學學報》，第2期，頁80-89。
    劉慧雯、柯籙晏（2016）。〈邁向厚數據：以「詮釋型資訊工具」 進行意義分析的概念基礎〉，2016中華傳播學會年會，台灣：嘉義。
    劉婷、張卓（2018）。〈身體-媒介/技術：麥克盧漢思想被忽視的維度〉。《新聞與傳播研究》，第5期，頁47-69 & 127-128。
    趙曉力譯（2004）。〈約翰·P.巴洛：網絡空間獨立宣言〉。《互聯網法律通訊》，第1卷（2），頁4。
    鄧蕾（2016）。〈「重返」文化：青年研究未來發展的進路探尋——國內青少年文化研究前沿報告（2008-2015）〉，《中國青年研究》，第1期，頁84-89。
    鄭宇君（2016）。〈社交媒體之雙重性：人的連結與技術的連結〉。《傳播文化政治》，第4期，頁1-25。
    鄭宇君、陳百齡（2016）。〈探索線上公眾即時參與網絡化社運——以台灣318運動為例〉。《傳播研究與實踐》，第6卷第1期，頁117-150。
    鄭長忠、李威利（2015）。〈重建整體性的組織邏輯——新形勢下的共青團團屬社會組織發展研究〉。《北京青年工作研究》，第3期，頁47-52。
    鍾蔚文（2015）。〈從行動到技能：邁向身體感〉。余舜德編，《身體感的轉向》（頁 37-62）。台北：台灣大學出版出版中心。
    謝光萍、吳怡萱譯（2006）。《電腦中介傳播：人際互動與網際網路》。台北：韋伯文化國際。（原書Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. [2004]. Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the Internet. London, UK: Sage.）
    簡妙如（1996）。《過度的閱聽人：「迷」之初探》。台灣政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    嚴宇鳴（2015）。〈青年外來務工人員利益表達方式研究〉。《青年研究》，第6期，頁11-18。
    譚天、吳佳真譯（1998）。《虛擬化身：網路時代的身份認同》。台北：遠流。（原書Turkle, S. [1995]. Life on the screen : Identity in the age of the Internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.）
    龔卓軍（2006）。《身體部署：梅洛龐蒂與現象學之後》。台北：心靈工坊文化。
    龔卓軍譯（2007）。《眼與心：身體現象學大師梅洛龐蒂的最後書寫》。台北：典藏藝術家庭。（原書Merlaeau-Ponty, M. [1964]. L`Oeil et l`Esprit. Paris: Gallimard.）
    龐學銓、馮芳譯（2012）。《身體與情感》。杭州：浙江大學出版社（原書Schmitz, H. [1992]. Leib und Gefühl: Materialien zu einer philosophischen Therapeutik. Paderborn, GE.: Junfermann.）


    英文文獻部分
    Agamben, G. (2009). What is an apparatus? And other essays. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University.
    Alač, M. (2011). Handling digital brains: A laboratory study of multimodal semiotic interaction in the age of computers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Balsamo, A. (1995). Forms of technological embodiment: Reading the body in contemporary culture. Body & Society, 1(3-4), 215-237.
    Banaji, S. (2011). Disempowering by assumptions: "Digital natives" and the EU Civic Web Project. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology and the new literacies (pp.49-66). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London, UK; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New media society, 11 (6), 985-1002.
    Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
    Bennet, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.
    Bennet, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and personalization of contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Bers, M. U., & Chau, C. (2006). Fostering civic engagement by building a virtual city. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 748-770.
    Berry, D. M. (2011). The computational turn: Thinking about the digital humanities. Cultural Machine, 12, 1-22. Retrieved from
    https://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/download/440/470
    Bevir, M. (1999). Foucault, power, and institutions. Political Studies, 47(2), 345-359.
    Blair, L. B., Claster, P. N., & Claster, S. M. (2015). Technology and youth: Growing up in a digital world. Bingley, York: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Blumer, H. (1969). Collective behavior. In A. M. Lee (Ed.), Principles of sociology (pp. 67-121). New York, NY: Barnes & Noble.
    Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295- 298.
    Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; Oxford, UK: B. Blackwell.
    boyd, D. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp.39-58). New York, NY: Routledge.
    boyd, D. (2014). It`s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, Conneti.: Yale University Press.
    boyd, D. & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), 11.

    Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
    Brügger, N. (2015). A brief history of Facebook as a media text: The development of an empty structure. First Monday, 20(5). Retrieved from
    http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5423/4466.
    Brunsting, S., & Postmes, T. (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research, 33, 525-554.
    Carey, J. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238-266.

    Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (6), 893-910.
    Chen, X. (2015). Collective action in digital China: A case study of the 2013 Southern Weekly Incident. In Yang G. (Ed.), China`s contested Internet (pp.283-304). Copenhagen, Denmark: NIAS Press.
    Chi, E. H. (2008). The social Web: Research and opportunities. Computer, 41(9), 88-91.
    Clark, A. (2007). Re-inventing ourselves: The plasticity of embodiment, sensing, and mind. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 32(3), 263-282.
    Corlett, W. (1989). Community without unity: A politics of Derridian extravagance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    Coté, M. (2011). Technics and the human sensorium: Rethinking media theory through the body. Theory & Event, 13(4).
    Couldry, N. (2003). Media rituals: A critical approach. London, UK: Routledge.
    Crossley, N. (1995). Merleau-Ponty, the elusive body and carnal sociology. Body and Society, 1(1), 43-63.
    Crossley, N. (2006). Reflexive embodiment in contemporary society. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
    Crossley, N. (2011). Towards relational sociology. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Csordas, T. J. (1997). The sacred self: A cultural phenomenology of charismatic healing. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
    Csordas, T. J. (1999). Embodiment and cultural phenomenology. In G. Weiss, & H. F. Harber (Eds.), Perspectives on embodiment: The intersections of nature and culture (pp.143-162). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirement, media richness and structural determinants. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
    Dahlgren, P. (2003.8). Net-Activism and the Emergence of Global Civic Cultures. Paper presented at The 16th Nordic Conference for Media and Communication Research, Kristiansand, Norway.
    Damon, C. (2018). How behavior spreads: The science of complex contagions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Davidson, C. (2011). Now you see it: How the brain science of attention will transform the way we live. New York, NY: Viking.
    December, J. (1997). Notes on defining of computer-mediated communication. Computer-mediated communication, 3(1), 1-14.
    Deleuze, G. (1992). What is a dispositive?. In T. J. Armstrong (Trans.), Michel Foucault, philosopher: Essays translated from the French and German (pp.159-168). New York; London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    Dewey, J. (1964). Impressions of Soviet Russia and the revolutionary world, Mexico, China, Turkey, 1929. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
    Dewey, J. A., Pacherie, E., & Knoblich, G. (2014). The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person. Cognition, 132, 383-397.
    Dingli, A., & Seychell, D. (2015). The new digital natives: Cutting the chord. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
    Drotner, K. (2005). Media on the move: Personalised media and the transformation of publicness. In S. Livingstone (Ed.), Audiences and publics: When cultural engagement matters for the public sphere (pp.187-212). Bristol, UK: Intellect.
    Dubrovsky, V. (1985). Real-time computer-mediated conferencing versus electronic mail. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th annual meeting. Santa Monica, Ca: Human Factors Society.
    Dubrovsky, V. K., Kiesler, S., & Sethan, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making group. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
    Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society. London, UK: Macmillan. 

    Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
    Elias, N., & Dunning, E. (1986). Quest for excitement: Sport and leisure in the civilizing process. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
    Fang, K., & Repnikova, M. (2017). Demystifying “little pink”: The creation and evolution of a gendered label for nationalistic activists in China. New Media & Society, 1-24.
    Fiske, S. T. (2010). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology. Hoboken, N.J.: J. Wiley.
    Floridi, L. (2011). The construction of personal identities online. Minds and Machines, 21(4), 477–79.
    Foley, J. D., van Dam, A., Feiner, S. K., & Hughes, J. F. (1990). Computer graphics: Principles and practice (2nd). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Company Inc.
    Foucault, M. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Bouchard, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
    Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
    Fusar-Poli, P., & Stanghellini G. M. (2009). Merleau-Ponty and the “embodied subjectivity”(1908-1961). Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 23(2), 91-93.
    Gallagher, S. (2014). Phenomenology and embodied cognition. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp.9-18). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Gamson, W. A., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114-125.
    Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The App generation: How today`s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven, Conneti.: Yale University Press.
    Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Gee, J. P. (2008). Video games and embodiment. Games and Culture, 3(3-4), 253-263.
    Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    Geertz, C. (1983). From the native`s point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In C. Geertz, Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology (pp. 55-70). New York, NY: Basic books.
    Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Grau, O. (2003). Virtual art: From illusion to immersion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Griffin, M., Herrmann, S., & Kittler, F. (1996). Technologies of writing: Interview with Friedrich A. Kittler. New Literary History, 27(4), 731-742.
    Groshek, J., & AI- Rawi, A. (2013). Public sentiment and critical framing in social media content during the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 563-576.

    Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.
    Hall, S. (1908). Adolescence. London, UK: Appleton.
    Halberstam, J., & Livingstone, I. (1995). Posthuman bodies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    Hansen, M. B. N. (2004). New philosophy for new media. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Hansen, M. B. N. (2006). Bodies in code: Interfaces with digital media. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York, NY: Penguin.
    Hart-Brinson, P., Yang, G., & Aroldi, P. (2016). Techno-social generations and communication research. In J. F. Nussbaum (Ed.), Communication across the life span (pp.91-106). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    Hayles, C. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago.
    Heidegger, M. (1992). Parmenides. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    Herring, S. C. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (Vol.39). John Benjamins Publishing.
    Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Hirzalla, F., & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Beyond the online/offline divide how youth’s online and offline civic activities converge. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 481-498.
    Hoffner, C. A., Lee, S., & Park, S. J. (2016). "I miss my mobile phone!": Self-expansion via mobile phone and responses to phone loss. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2452-2468.
    Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
    Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp.283-307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Hutchins, E. (2010). Imagining the cognitive life of things. In L. Malafouris & C. Renfrew (Eds.), The cognitive life of things: Recasting the boundaries of the mind (pp.91-101). Cambridge, Mass.: McDonald Archaeological Institute.
    Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. Dordrecht, Holland; Boston, US: D. Reidel Pub. Co..
    Ihde, D. (1983). Existential technics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
    Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.
    Ihde, D. (2015). Acoustic technics. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
    Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    Innis, H. (1972). Empire and communications. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press.
    Irwin, A. & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: the development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Jefferson, T. (1973). The teds: A political resurrection. Discussion paper, Birmingham, UK: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, University of Birmingham.
    Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York, NY: New York University Press.
    Jensen, J. (1992). Fandom as pathology: The consequences of characterization. In L. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience: Fan culture and popular media (pp.9-26). London, UK: Routeledge.
    Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, reason and imagination. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
    Kiesler, S. (1986). The hidden messages in computer network. Harvard Business Review, 64, 46-54 & 58-60.
    Kinsbourne, M., & Jordan, J. S. (2009). Embodied anticipation: A neurodevelopmental interpretation. Discourse Processes, 46(2-3), 103-126.
    Kittler, F. (1986). Grammophon, film, typewriter. Berlin, GE: Verlag Brinkman & Bose.
    Kittler, F. (2009). Optical media. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 59–101). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
    Krueger, M. W. (1993). An easy entry artificial reality. In A. Wexelblat (Ed.), Virtual reality: Applications and explorations (pp.147-162). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press Professional.
    LaFrance, J. P. (1996). Games and players in the electronic age: Tools for analyzing the use of video games by adults and children. The French Journal of Communication, 4(2), 101-132.
    Lash, S. (2002). Critique of information. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.
    Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Leung, T. L. (2009). Users-generated content on the Internet: An examination of gratifications, civic engagement, and psychological empowerment. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1327-1347.
    Levinas, E. (1985). Ethics and infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
    Licoppe, C. (2005). “Connected presence”: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 135-156.
    Lock, M., & Farquhar, J. (2007). Beyond the body proper: Reading the anthropology of material life. Durham: Duke University Press.
    Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., & Helbing, D. (2011). How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(22), 9020-2025.
    Maffesoli, M. (1996). The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London, UK; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Mageo, J. (2011). Empathy and as if attachment in Samoa. In D. W. Hollan & C. J. Throop (Eds.), The anthropology of empathy: Experiencing the lives of others in Pacific societies (pp.69-94). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
    Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276-320). London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social media. Retrieved from http://manovich.net/content/04-projects/068-trending-the-promises-and-the-challenges-of-big-social-data/64-article-2011.pdf
    Mason, H. & Patil, D. J. (2015). Data Driven: Creating a data culture. New York, NY: O’Reilly.
    Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual. Durham: Duke University Press.
    Mauss, M. (1973). Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70-88.
    Mayall, B. (2013). A History of the sociology of childhood. London, UK: Institute of Education Press.
    McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. N. (1988). Social movements. In N. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
    McLuhan, M. (2001). Understanding media. London; New York: Routledge.
    McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The medium is the message. New York, 123, 126-128.
    McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
    McPhail, C., & Miller, D. (1973). The assembling process: A theoretical and empirical examination. American Sociological Review, 38, 721-735.
    Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London, Victoria, Auckland, Bergvlei: Hutchinson Radius.
    Melucci, A. (1994). A strange kind of newness: What’s “new” in new social movements?. In E. Larana, H. Johnston, & J. R. Gusfield (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity (pp.101-130). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138-166.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1995). The visible and the invisible: Followed by working notes. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
    Meyrowitz, J. (2002). Media and behavior: a missing link. In D. McQuail (Ed.), McQuail`s reader in mass communication theory (pp.99-112). London, UK: Sage.
    Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnography. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
    Milne, E. (2010). Letters, postcards, Email: Technologies of presence. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
    Napoli, A. (2014). Social media use and generational identity: Issues and consequences on peer-to-peer and cross-generational relationships: An empirical study. Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 11(2), 182-206.
    Narvanen A. & Nasman, E. (2004). Childhood as generation or life phase?. Young, 12 (1), 71-91.
    Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. London, UK: MIT.
    Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    Nguyen, D. & Alexander, J. (1996). The coming of cyberspacetime and the end of the polity. In R. Shields (Ed.), Cultures of Internet (pp.996-1124). London: Sage.
    Oberschall, A. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs., N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
    Ochs, E. & Capps, L. (1996). Narrating the self. Annual review of anthropology, 25, 19-43.
    Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    Papacharissi, Z. (2011). Conclusion: A networked self. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp.304-318). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
    Pepperell, R. (2003). The posthuman condition: Consciousness beyond the brain. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.
    Peters, J. D. (2015). The marvelous clouds: Toward a philosophy of elemental media. Chicago, US: The University of Chicago Press.
    Porter, D. (Ed.) (1997). Internet culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Prensky, M. (2000). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    Prensky, M. (2011). Digital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology and the new literacies (pp.49-66). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
    Pisan, Y. (2007, December). My guild, my people: Role of guilds in massively multiplayer online games. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 4th Australasian conference on Interactive entertainment (IE ’07). Melbourne, Australia.
    Radway, J. (1987). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. London, UK; New York, NY: Verso.
    Robins, K. (1995). Cyberspace and the world we live in. Body and Society, 1(3/4), 135-155.
    Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
    Romanyshyn, R. D. (1989). Technology as symptom and dream. London; New York: Routledge.
    Rosenberger, R. (2009). The sudden experience of the computer. AI and Society, 24, 173-180.
    Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P-P. (2015). A field guide to postphenomenology. In R. Rosenberger & P-P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (pp.9-41). Lanham, Mariland: Lexington Books.
    Rule, J., & Tilly, C. (1975). Political process in revolutionary France: 1830-1832. In J. M. Merriman (Ed.), 1830 in France (pp.41-85). New York, NY: New Viewpoints.
    Rutter, D. R. (1987). Communicating by telephone. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
    Sanders, J. T. (1997). An ontology of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 9(1), 97-112.
    Schegloff, E. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on language and linguistics: Analyzing discourse and talk (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    Schmidt, R. C., & O’Brien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecological Psychology, 9, 189–206.
    Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. In A. Fuchs & V. Jirsa (Eds.), Coordination: Neural, behavioral and social dynamics. Berlin, GE: Springer.
    Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Matinus Nijhof.
    Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Lehnert, London: Heinemann Educational Books.
    Schutz, A., & Luckman, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    Sennett, R. (1994). Flesh and stone. London, UK: Faber and Faber.
    Searle, J. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. E. Pol-lack (Eds.), Intentions in communication, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
    Serres, M. (2015). Thumbelina: The culture and technology of millennials. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd.
    Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Oxford, UK: Harper.
    Shilling, C. (1993). The body and social theory. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer-interaction. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley Longman.
    Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (1992). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

    Simmel, G. (1971). George Simmel on individuality and social forms. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
    Slack, A. (2010/07/02). Cultural acupuncture and a future for social change. Retrieved from https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cultural-acupuncture-and_b_633824
    Smart, P. R. (2012). The Web-extended mind. Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 426-445.
    Soliman, T., & Glenberg, A. M. (2014). The embodiment of culture. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp.207-219). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Somers, M. R. (1993). Citizenship and the place of the public sphere: Law, community, and political culture in the transition to democracy. American Sociological Review, 58, 587-620.
    Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the social in computer-mediated communication. Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic email in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
    Steelcase (2013). Global posture study. Steelcase, Retrieved from https://www.steelcase.com/content/uploads/2019/05/global-posture-study.pdf
    Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a hostile world: The evolution of human cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time 1. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
    Subrahmanyam, K., & Smahel, D. (2011). Digital youth: The role of media in development. Berlin, GE: Springer.
    Suchman, L. S. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Susi, T. (2014). Embodied interaction, coordination and reasoning in computer gameplay. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp.184-194). New York, NY: Routledge.
    Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. The Review of Metaphysics, 25(1), 3-51.
    Tilly, C. (1979). Repetoires of contention in America and Britain, 1750-1830. In M. N. Zald, & J. D. McCarthy (Eds.), The dynamics of social movements: Resource mobilization, social control, and tactics (pp.126-155). Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop Publishers.
    Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Trier-Bieniek, A. (Ed.). (2015). Feminist theory and pop culture. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
    Trotter, W. (1917). Instincts of the herd in peace and war. New York, NY: Macmillan.
    Turner, F. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
    Urry, J. (2000). Mobile sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 185-203.
    van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    van Ulzen, N. R., Lamoth, C. J., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, G. R., & Beek, P. J. (2008). Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking in pairs. Neuroscience Letters, 432, 88-93.
    Verbeek, P-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23, 998-1003.
    Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
    Westerman, D., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2012). A social network as information: The effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 199-206.
    Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 358, 593-602.
    Wu, A. X. (2014). The shared pasts of solitary readers in China: Connecting web use and changing political understanding through reading histories. Media, Culture & Society, 36(8), 1168-1185.
    Zahavi, D. (2003). Husserl`s phenomenology. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
    Zhang, W. (2016). The Internet and new social media formation in China: Fandom publics in the making. London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院博士班
    103463501
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103463501
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000734
    显示于类别:[傳播博士班] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈