政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131218

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/131218

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131218

Title:	民眾支持電動公車政策關鍵因素之探討 A Study on the Key Factors of People Supporting Electric Bus Policy
Authors:	林鼎峰 Lin, Ting-Feng
Contributors:	黃慶堂 Huang, Chin-Tan 林鼎峰 Lin, Ting-Feng
Keywords:	電動公車公共運輸公共政策 Electric Buses Public Transportation Public Policy
Date:	2020
Issue Date:	2020-08-03 18:19:08 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	因應全球暖化所帶來的負面衝擊，減少溫室氣體排放及能源消耗已成為各國當前與未來的發展及施政重點。其中，提升運輸部門的能源效率逐漸已成為節能減碳的重要課題。而電動車能有效節能減碳之運具，其單位公里能量消耗、二氧化碳排放量分別為汽油引擎車輛的 1/3、1/4。在此特性下，電動車隨著電池及電動技術之進展已成為各國積極推展之措施。究竟影響民眾支持電動公車政策關鍵因素為何? 實值得加以探討。本研究採便利抽樣問卷方式，發放對象為搭乘電動公車的民眾，以及本研究生之學程前後3屆同學、職場集團關係企業同事，共回收問卷363 份，探討影響民眾支持電動公車政策關鍵因素，研究結果顯示電動公車的性能、服務品質、及環保效益對民眾政策支持有正向影響效果；民眾所抱持的環保意向對政策支持亦具有正向影響之效果。 In response to the negative impact of global warming, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption has become one of national policy priorities; Reducing carbon usage by improving energy efficiency in transportation has become an important issue .The electric car can effectively reduce carbon emissions as a vehicle, as its unit kilometer energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions were respectively 1/3 and 1/4 of fossil fuel vehicles. Because of this function, electric cars, along with the development of electric battery and technology, have been a measure that has been actively promoted in every country. However, due to some limitations, such as price, endurance problem, charging problem and other factors, the promotion has been going slow. As of electric bus, because its characteristics are quite different than private vehicle and it has an amount of subsidy funded by the government, the easier it is to break through these limitations. However, the past researches on electric vehicles focus more on small cars and motorcycles, not on electric buses. Based on the background above, the research employs Ordered Logistic Regression Analysis to structure the key factors that affect the public support the policy of the electric bus. The result of the potential user model shows that the performance, the sever quality, and environmental benefits of the electric bus significant positive affects the public support the policy of the electric bus. Beside, the public`s environmental protection intention also significant positive affects the public support the policy of the electric bus.
Reference:	參考文獻一、中文部分丁煌（2002）。政策執行阻滯機制及其防治對策。北京：人民出版社。朱道凱（譯）（2007）。Deborah Stone著。政策弔詭：政治決策的藝術。臺北市：群學。立法院（2016）。我國綠色運輸法制建構之探討。臺北市：胡文棟。朱斌妤、李素貞（1998）。環境影響評估中民眾參與機制之探討。中國行政評論，8（1），頁 85-114。 doi: 10.6635/cpar.1998.8(1).05 宋威穎、曹瀚文、侯彥廷（2019）。高雄辦理生態交通全球盛典對哈瑪星社區衝擊與影響－政策利害關係人角度分析。中國地方自治，72（1），頁 3-27。 doi: 10.6581/lsgc.201901_72(1).0002 李允傑、丘昌泰（2003）。政策執行與評估。臺北：元照出版社。李克聰（2013）。國道計程收費及創新管理之我見（366），頁 40-48。周國雄（2008）。博弈：公共政策執行力與利益主體。上海：華東師範大學出版社。高雄生態交通全球盛典(2017)。什麼是生態交通（EcoMobility）? 資料引自： http://www.ecomobilityfestival2017.org/ 高雄生態交通全球盛典張其錄、宋威穎、洪嘉聰（2017）。高雄市民眾對生態交通試辦活動認知之研究-以哈瑪星春天市集為例。論文發表於第五屆滬台公共管理論壇：公共服務與基層治理，上海，華東政法大學。張國慶（2004）。公共政策分析。上海：復旦大學出版社。許國賢（2011）。民主生活與公共利益：一個預備性的考察。行政暨政策學報，53，頁 1-24。許添本（2003）。人本交通與綠色交通的發展理念。都市交通，18（3），頁 41-52。doi: 10.29774/UT.200309.0004 陳振明（1998）。政策科學。北京：中國人民大學出版社。黃光立、曾台輔（2018）。因應國內外電動車發展趨勢我國推動 MRA 策略分析。經濟部研究報告。臺北市：經濟部。蔡宏政（2009）。公共政策中的專家政治與民主參與：以高雄「跨港纜車」公民共識會議爲例。臺灣社會學刊，43，頁 1-42。謝騄璘（2018）。電動車最普及國家－挪威電動車市場剖析。機械工業雜誌，421，頁 33-38。二、英文部分 Gupta, A. (2013). Environment & PEST analysis: an approach to the external business environment. International Journal of Modern Social Sciences, 2(1), 34-43. Ho, J. K.-K. (2014). Formulation of a systemic PEST analysis for strategic analysis. European academic research, 2(5), 6478-6492. Litman, T., & Burwell, D. (2006). Issues in sustainable transportation. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 6(4), 331-347. Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. (1999). Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence: Island press. Otto-Zimmermann, K., & Park, Y. (2015). Neighborhood in motion. Stadtquartier in Bewegung. One neighborhood, one month, no cars. An urban experiment transforming spaces, mindset and lifestyle. Ein Stadtquartier, ein Monat, autofrei. Ein städtisches Experiment verändert Stadtraum, Denkart und Lebenssstil: Jovis. Peters, A. (2015). These Historical Photos Show How Amsterdam Turned Itself Into A Bike Rider’s Paradise. Retrieved March 15, 2016, from http://www.fastcoexist.com/3052699/these-historical-photos-show-how-amsterdam-turn ed-itself-into-a-bike-riders-paradise. Sammut‐Bonnici, T., & Galea, D. (2015). PEST analysis. Wiley Encyclopedia of management, 1-1. Steg, L., & Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of transport geography, 13(1), 59-69.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 105921026
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105921026
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202000766
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

社群 sharing

Loading...