政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130220
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51121101      線上人數 : 886
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/130220


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130220


    題名: 意識如何緣取不存在的對象？ 以經量部上座的理論與說一切有部眾賢的批評為中心
    How Does the Mental Consciousness Cognize Nonexistent Objects?--Focusing on the Theory of the Sautrāntika Master Śrīlāta and the Criticism Thereof from the Sarvāstivāda Master Saṃghabhadra 
    作者: 耿晴
    Keng, Ching
    貢獻者: 哲學系
    關鍵詞: 意識 ;不存在的對象 ;上座 ; 眾賢 ;說一切有部 ;經量部 
    Mental consciousness ;Non-existent objects; Śrīlāta;Saṃghabhadra ; Sarvāstivāda;Sautrāntika
    日期: 2019-06
    上傳時間: 2020-06-22 14:30:35 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文旨在檢討佛教阿毘達磨哲學之經量部論師上座關於「意識如何緣取不存在的對象」的理論，以及來自於說一切有部論師眾賢的批評。不同於有部三世實有的形上學立場，在經量部剎那滅的形上學前提下，上座必須面對不存在的對象如何能夠引生意識的困難。本文集中探討意識耴如何緣取不存在的對象的三種案例:(1)緊接眼識後生起的意識如何緣取已經不存在的外在對象?(2)意識如何回憶?
    The article investigates the theory held by the Sautrāntika Master Srilata about how the mental consciousness cognizes non-existent objects and the criticism thereof from the Sarastivada Master Samghabhadra. Different from the ontological scheme of〝all dharmas are real in the past,present and future,〞 Srilata starts from the ontological scheme of momentariness and has to face the difficulty of how non-existent objects can cause the mental consciousness to arise. The article explores the issue in question by driving it into three cases: (1)How does the mental consciousness that succeeds a sensory consciousness cognize an external object that does not exist when the mental consciousness arises? (2)How does the mental consciousness memorize, i.e.,cognize a long-past object that one has experienced? (3)How does the mental consciousness cognize a past object that one has not experienced or future object? Under these three cases, this article explores the various strategies proposed by Srilata for resolving the difficulties, and the criticism thereof from Samghabhadra. This article sides with Samghabhadra`s criticism, but suggests that the irresolvable difficulties actually motivate further development of Buddhist epistemology. After Srilata Dignanga`s idea that cognition there is a mental image of the object, can successfully defends itself against Samghabhadra`s criticism.
    關聯: 正觀, Vol.89, pp.31-69
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    136.pdf721KbAdobe PDF2310檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋