English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50975630      Online Users : 975
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127741


    Title: 混合寡占市場下利潤稅的中立性公營廠商目標函數一般化的情況
    Profit Tax Neutrality in a Mixed Oligopoly When a Public Firm Pursues General Objectives
    Authors: 李品逸
    Li, Pin-Yi
    Contributors: 翁堃嵐
    李品逸
    Li, Pin-Yi
    Keywords: 混合寡占市場
    民營化政策
    利潤稅中立性
    一般化目標函數
    Mixed oligopoly
    Privatization policy
    Profit tax neutrality
    General objectives
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-12-06 09:24:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文在公營廠商的目標函數一般化的情況下,探討同質混合寡占市場下利 潤稅中立性以及最適的民營化政策。依據本文研究結果顯示: (1) 在混合寡占市場下,由於公營廠商的目標函數並非追求利潤之極大,因此在釋股比例為外生的情況下,利潤稅的課徵對廠商的產出決策將不具中立性,然而在釋股比例為內生的情況下,課徵利潤稅對產出決策及社會福利水準均具有中立性。(2) 在考慮外人持股的開放體系下,不論民營化程度為外生或內生,利潤稅的中立性將無法成立。
    This paper considers the case where a public firm pursues general objectives. We discuss the profit tax neutrality theorem and the optimal privatization policy under the
    homogenous mixed oligopolistic market. The major findings are as follow (1) The objective function of public firms is not pursuit of maximizing profits under mixed oligopolistic market. When the privatization level is exogenously given, the profit tax which affects market equilibrium is no longer neutral. However, under the optimal privatization policy, an exogenous increase of profit tax rate will not affect market equilibrium and the social welfare level (i.e. profit tax is neutral) (2) The model of foreign shareholding is considered.Regardless of whether the degree of privatization is exogenous or endogenous, the neutrality of the profit tax doesn’t hold.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    林宛儀 (2012),〈公營廠商民營化的最適釋股比例分析—考慮租稅的情況〉,《經濟論文》,頁1-29。
    翁永和、羅鈺珊、劉碧珍 (2003),〈市場結構與最適民營化政策〉,《經濟論文》,頁149-169
    翁堃嵐、林宛儀、郭虹儀 (2014),〈混合寡占市場下利潤稅的中立性與最適釋股比例〉,《應用經濟論叢》,第96期。
    翁堃嵐、吳家恩(2009),〈查核不確定下廠商之生產與逃漏決策〉,《經濟研究》,第45卷第1期,頁1-9 。
    邱俊榮、黃鴻 (2006),〈公營廠商民營化的最適釋股比例分析〉,《經濟論文叢刊》,第34眷第2期,頁245-259。
    賴紫琳 (2018),〈公共社會企業下的民營化政策與中立性〉。
    國家發展委員會官方網站 https://www.ndc.gov.tw/。

    英文文獻
    Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of public economics, 1(3-4), 323-338.
    Baldini, M., & Lambertini, L. (2011). Profit taxation and capital accumulation in a dynamic oligopoly model. Japan and the World Economy, 23(1), 13-18.
    Chang, C. W., Wu, D., & Lin, Y. S. (2018). Price control and privatization in a mixed duopoly with a public social enterprise. Journal of Economics, 124(1), 57-73.
    Cremer, H., Marchand, M., & Thisse, J. F. (1989). The public firm as an instrument for regulating an oligopolistic market. Oxford Economic Papers, 283-301.
    Cremer, H., Marchand, M., & Thisse, J. F. (1991). Mixed oligopoly with differentiated products. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(1), 43-53.
    De Fraja, G., & Delbono, F. (1989). Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41(2), 302-311.
    De Fraja, G., & Delbono, F. (1990). Game theoretic models of mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economic Surveys, 4(1), 1-17.
    Fjell, K., & Pal, D. (1996). A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Canadian Journal of economics, 737-743.
    Fujiwara, K. (2007). Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 92(1), 51-65.
    George, K., & La Manna, M. M. (1996). Mixed duopoly, inefficiency, and public ownership. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(6), 853-860.
    Goerke, L., & Runkel, M. (2006). Profit tax evasion under oligopoly with endogenous market structure. National Tax Journal, 851-857.
    Hamada, K. (2018). Privatization Neutrality Theorem: When a Public Firm Pursues General Objectives. The Japanese Economic Review, 69(1), 59-68.
    Kreutzer, D., & Lee, D. R. (1986). On taxation & understated monopoly profits. National Tax Journal, 39(2), 241-243.
    Lee, K. (1998). Tax evasion, monopoly, and nonneutral profit taxes. National Tax Journal, 333-338.
    Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473-483.
    Matsumura, T., & Kanda, O. (2005). Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. Journal of Economics, 84(1), 27-48.
    Matsumura, T., & Tomaru, Y. (2012). Market structure and privatization policy under international competition. The Japanese Economic Review, 63(2), 244-258.
    Nabin, M. H., Nguyen, X., Sgro, P. M., & Chao, C. C. (2014). Strategic quality competition, mixed oligopoly and privatization. International Review of Economics & Finance, 34, 142-150.
    Pal, D., & White, M. D. (1998). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. Southern Economic Journal, 264-281.
    Panteghim, P. M. (1996). SUNK COSTS AND PROFIT TAXATION: A SOURCE OF TAX NON‐NEUTRALITY. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 43(1), 85-98..
    Panteghini, P. (2001). On corporate tax asymmetries and neutrality. German Economic Review, 2(3), 269-286.
    Parai, A. K. (1999). Profit tax and tariff under international oligopoly. International Review of Economics & Finance, 8(3), 317-326.
    Ueng, K.L.G., and Wang, L.F.S., (2019), “Corporate Tax Evasion In Mixed Oligopoly with Asymmetric Costs.” Working Paper
    Ueng, K.L.G., Peng, C. H., and Kuo, H. I., (2018), “On the Neutrality of Profit Taxation in a Mixed Oligopoly.” Western Economic Association International 93rd Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada.
    Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. K. (1988). Privatization: An economic analysis (Vol. 18). MIT press.
    Wang, L. F. (1990). Tax evasion and monopoly output decisions with endogenous probability of detection. Public Finance Quarterly, 18(4), 480-487.
    Wang, L. F., & Conant, J. L. (1988). Corporate tax evasion and output decisions of the uncertain monopolist. National Tax Journal, 41(4), 579-581.
    Wu, T. M. (2016). Profit Tax Evasion under Wage Bargaining Structure. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 16(2), 817-834.
    Wu, T. M., & Yang, C. C. (2011). Monopolists` Profit Tax Evasion Revisited: When Firms Have Objectives Other than Maximizing Profit. Public Finance Review, 39(6), 831-840.
    Yaniv, G. (1995). A note on the tax evading firm. National Tax Journal, 113-120.
    Yaniv, G. (1996). Tax evasion and monopoly output decisions: Note. Public Finance Quarterly, 24(4), 501-505.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    106255027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106255027
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201901255
    Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    502701.pdf575KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback