政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119792

政大典藏 > College of Foreign Languages and Literature > Department of English > Theses > Item 140.119/119792

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119792

Title:	針對英語為外語學習者探究文法結構教學：歸納或演繹? Teaching Grammar for EFL Learners: Inductive or Deductive?
Authors:	李思穎 Lee, Szu-Ying
Contributors:	劉怡君 Liu, Yi-Chun 李思穎 Lee, Szu-Ying
Keywords:	歸納演繹精通文法學習 Inductive Deductive Proficiency Grammar learning
Date:	2018
Issue Date:	2018-08-29 16:02:47 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	這篇論文主要是針對英語為外語學習者比較歸納、演繹及兩者綜合的文法教學法。施測對象是臺灣的109位高一學生，研究方法包含前測、後測及問卷調查。結果顯示出在教導學生關係代名詞及條件句時，綜合教學法較其他二者佳，但是在教授動名詞時，則是演繹方式較佳，原因可能是因為學生在先前有過更多關於動名詞的練習，所以當教師設計文法教學時應考量學生的能力及句型種類。 Numerous studies have investigated the difference in effectiveness between inductive and deductive approaches to teaching grammar. In the inductive approach, teachers provide examples and then guide students toward noticing the patterns of grammar rules, whereas in the deductive approach, teachers provide explicit instruction in grammar rules and then ask students to practice the sentences. Following an in-depth literature review, the teacher-researcher conducted a quasiexperimental study in a high school in Taiwan with 109 student-participants. Three types of grammar rules (gerunds, conditional clauses and relative clauses) were instructed to students through the inductive, deductive, and combined approaches. Pretest and posttest data were collected and compared. The results indicated that for conditional and relative clauses grammar rules, the combined approach leads to signiﬁcantly higher performance than the others. For gerunds, students under the deductive approach had significantly higher scores. The inductive approach was the least effective approach to teaching grammar to EFL novice learners. The findings suggest that teachers designing their curricula for teaching grammar need to consider learners’ language proficiency. Future studies should focus on interactions between the three approaches.
Reference:	Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaning verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology. Ausubel, D.P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning: An introduction to school learning. New York: Grune & Stratton. Brown, H.D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Longman. Cahyono, & Widiati (2006). The teaching of English grammar in the Indonesian context: the state of the art. Celt, Vol. 6 Carroll, John B. (1964). Language and thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 459–480. Chalipa, S. (2013). The effect of inductive vs. deductive instructional approach in grammar Learning of ESL Learners. International Researchers, 2(2), 178–186. Cole, S., Haight, C., & Herron, C. (2007). The effects of deductive and guided inductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary language college classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 288–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb03202.x Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Eisenstein, M. (1987). Grammatical explanations in ESL: Teach the student, not the method. In M. Long & J. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL (pp. 282– 292). New Jersey: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Ellis, R. (1993). Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91–113. Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 87–105. Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223–236. Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 242–260 Felder, R., & Henriques, E. (1995). Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals 28(1), 21–31. Fischer, R. A. (1979). "The inductive-deductive controversy revisited", The Modern Language Journal, 63(3), 98–105. doi: 10.2307/325777 General language competence and adult second language reading. In J. Devine, P.L.Carrell and D.E.Eskey (Eds.), (1987). Research on reading English as a Second Language Washington, D.C.: TESOL. Goner, Philips, & Steve Walters (1978). "Inductive and deductive approach in TESOL." In Heinmann (1995). Teaching Practice Handbook Structures: Grammar and Function (pp. 129 –138). Pedagogy. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 74, No. 4 (Winter 1990): 451-458. Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction. French Review, 65, 708–718. Jiroft and Simin (2013). The effects of inductive and deductive instructional approach in grammar learning of ESL learners. International Journal of Advanced Research Studies, 76–90. Takimoto. M. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the development of language learners` pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 369–386. Mohammed, A.A., & Jaber, H. A. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive approaches of teaching on Jordanian university students’ use of the active and passive voice in English. College Student Journal, 42(2), 545–553. Mountone, P. (2004). How to use examples effectively: deductive vs. inductive approaches. Santa Barbara: University of California. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search conditions, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67. Schrampfer, Azar B. and Spack, Koch, R. (2005). Understanding and Using English Grammar: Interactive. TESL-EJ Top, volume 9, No.3. Shaffer, C. (1989). A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 395–403. Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold. Tammenga-Helmantel, M., Arends, E., & Canrinus, E. (2014). The effectiveness of deductive, inductive, implicit and incidental grammatical instruction in second language classrooms. System, 45, 198–210. Uddin, K., & Ahmed, T. (2012). Inductive and contextual approaches to English grammar teaching. Language in India 12(11), 166. Widodo, H.P. (2006). Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(1), 122–141.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班 102951010
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102951010
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/THE.NCCU.ETMA.004.2018.A07
Appears in Collections:	[Department of English] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
101001.pdf	572Kb	Adobe PDF2	227	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...