政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119792

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119792

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51251753 線上人數 : 870

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 外國語文學院 > 英語教學碩士在職專班 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/119792

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119792

題名:	針對英語為外語學習者探究文法結構教學：歸納或演繹? Teaching Grammar for EFL Learners: Inductive or Deductive?
作者:	李思穎 Lee, Szu-Ying
貢獻者:	劉怡君 Liu, Yi-Chun 李思穎 Lee, Szu-Ying
關鍵詞:	歸納演繹精通文法學習 Inductive Deductive Proficiency Grammar learning
日期:	2018
上傳時間:	2018-08-29 16:02:47 (UTC+8)
摘要:	這篇論文主要是針對英語為外語學習者比較歸納、演繹及兩者綜合的文法教學法。施測對象是臺灣的109位高一學生，研究方法包含前測、後測及問卷調查。結果顯示出在教導學生關係代名詞及條件句時，綜合教學法較其他二者佳，但是在教授動名詞時，則是演繹方式較佳，原因可能是因為學生在先前有過更多關於動名詞的練習，所以當教師設計文法教學時應考量學生的能力及句型種類。 Numerous studies have investigated the difference in effectiveness between inductive and deductive approaches to teaching grammar. In the inductive approach, teachers provide examples and then guide students toward noticing the patterns of grammar rules, whereas in the deductive approach, teachers provide explicit instruction in grammar rules and then ask students to practice the sentences. Following an in-depth literature review, the teacher-researcher conducted a quasiexperimental study in a high school in Taiwan with 109 student-participants. Three types of grammar rules (gerunds, conditional clauses and relative clauses) were instructed to students through the inductive, deductive, and combined approaches. Pretest and posttest data were collected and compared. The results indicated that for conditional and relative clauses grammar rules, the combined approach leads to signiﬁcantly higher performance than the others. For gerunds, students under the deductive approach had significantly higher scores. The inductive approach was the least effective approach to teaching grammar to EFL novice learners. The findings suggest that teachers designing their curricula for teaching grammar need to consider learners’ language proficiency. Future studies should focus on interactions between the three approaches.
參考文獻:	Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaning verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology. Ausubel, D.P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning: An introduction to school learning. New York: Grune & Stratton. Brown, H.D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Longman. Cahyono, & Widiati (2006). The teaching of English grammar in the Indonesian context: the state of the art. Celt, Vol. 6 Carroll, John B. (1964). Language and thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Grammar pedagogy in second and foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 459–480. Chalipa, S. (2013). The effect of inductive vs. deductive instructional approach in grammar Learning of ESL Learners. International Researchers, 2(2), 178–186. Cole, S., Haight, C., & Herron, C. (2007). The effects of deductive and guided inductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary language college classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 288–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb03202.x Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Eisenstein, M. (1987). Grammatical explanations in ESL: Teach the student, not the method. In M. Long & J. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL (pp. 282– 292). New Jersey: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Ellis, R. (1993). Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91–113. Ellis, R. (1995). Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 87–105. Ellis, R. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223–236. Erlam, R. (2003). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 242–260 Felder, R., & Henriques, E. (1995). Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education. Foreign Language Annals 28(1), 21–31. Fischer, R. A. (1979). "The inductive-deductive controversy revisited", The Modern Language Journal, 63(3), 98–105. doi: 10.2307/325777 General language competence and adult second language reading. In J. Devine, P.L.Carrell and D.E.Eskey (Eds.), (1987). Research on reading English as a Second Language Washington, D.C.: TESOL. Goner, Philips, & Steve Walters (1978). "Inductive and deductive approach in TESOL." In Heinmann (1995). Teaching Practice Handbook Structures: Grammar and Function (pp. 129 –138). Pedagogy. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 74, No. 4 (Winter 1990): 451-458. Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction. French Review, 65, 708–718. Jiroft and Simin (2013). The effects of inductive and deductive instructional approach in grammar learning of ESL learners. International Journal of Advanced Research Studies, 76–90. Takimoto. M. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the development of language learners` pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 369–386. Mohammed, A.A., & Jaber, H. A. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive approaches of teaching on Jordanian university students’ use of the active and passive voice in English. College Student Journal, 42(2), 545–553. Mountone, P. (2004). How to use examples effectively: deductive vs. inductive approaches. Santa Barbara: University of California. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search conditions, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67. Schrampfer, Azar B. and Spack, Koch, R. (2005). Understanding and Using English Grammar: Interactive. TESL-EJ Top, volume 9, No.3. Shaffer, C. (1989). A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 395–403. Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold. Tammenga-Helmantel, M., Arends, E., & Canrinus, E. (2014). The effectiveness of deductive, inductive, implicit and incidental grammatical instruction in second language classrooms. System, 45, 198–210. Uddin, K., & Ahmed, T. (2012). Inductive and contextual approaches to English grammar teaching. Language in India 12(11), 166. Widodo, H.P. (2006). Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(1), 122–141.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班 102951010
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102951010
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/THE.NCCU.ETMA.004.2018.A07
顯示於類別:	[英語教學碩士在職專班] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
101001.pdf	572Kb	Adobe PDF2	227	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋