Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99830
|
| Title: | 台灣民眾轉至成人的生命歷程研究
The Life Course Study of Transition to Adulthood in Taiwan |
| Authors: | 翁康容
Weng, Kang Jung |
| Contributors: | 謝雨生
張峯彬
Hsieh, Yeu Sheng
Chang, Feng Bin
翁康容
Weng, Kang Jung |
| Keywords: | 轉至成人
生命歷程
年齡規範
多軌道序列分析
transition to adulthood
life course
age norm
multichannel sequence analysis |
| Date: | 2016 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-08-09 11:57:28 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以生命歷程之研究取徑探討台灣民眾「轉至成人」(transition to adulthood)的歷程，嘗試回答以完成學業、開始工作、初次結婚以及初次生育所交織而成的轉至成人歷程呈現出哪些典型的類型、這些類型之轉至成人重要生命事件呈現出什麼樣的「持續期」(duration)、「順序」(order)與「時間間隔」(interval)、人口特徵如何影響轉至成人歷程類型，以及隨著時序展開，轉至成人歷程呈現出什麼樣的出生世代變遷。本研究以台灣社會變遷基本調查第三期第二次東亞比較調查與東亞社會階層與社會流動研究兩筆資料合併後進行分析，總分析樣本為7,248筆。
本研究使用能處理多重且動態生命事件的「多軌道序列分析」尋找轉至成人歷程類型，分別在1935-55、1956-67、1968-84出生世代找出4、3、4個轉至成人歷程類型，分析結果顯示各類型間的變異性隨著出生世代逐步增加，轉至成人重要生命事件的發生年齡也呈現出越來越晚的趨勢。
此外，研究也發現轉至成人歷程之持續期隨著出生世代逐漸延長，轉至成人生命事件的順序卻仍然穩固地呈現初次結婚、生育事件發生在完成學業與開始工作之後，而初次生育也持續地發生在初次結婚之後，順序的變動僅出現在完成學業與開始工作之間。時間間隔的分析則顯示轉至成人歷程延長最主要的因素來自於初次結婚事件的延後，而非初次生育，也就是在早期出生世代中結婚事件阻擋轉至成人歷程延長的效果隨著出生世代減弱了。
在人口特徵對於轉至成人歷程類型的影響效果探討上，研究發現性別和家庭社經地位對於轉至成人歷程類型的影響效果不但顯著，而且在不同出生世代都持續著。族群的影響效果則僅在最早出生世代較為明確，隨著出生世代越晚，族群間的轉至成人歷程差異逐漸縮小。
This study explores the transition to adulthood in Taiwan adopting the life course approach. Using school completion, first full-time job, first marriage, and first birth to define transition to adulthood, we try to reveal the typology of transition to adulthood in Taiwan, the duration, order, and time interval of the life events of transition to adulthood, the influence of demographics on transition to adulthood, and the cohort change of transition to adulthood spanning from 1935-84. Combining data from two surveys, Second year, third round of Taiwan Social Change Survey and Social Stratification and Social Mobility in Three Countries, 7,248 life courses are analyzed.
Using Multichannel Sequence Analysis, which is capable of handling multiple dynamics life events, we find 4, 3, and 4 types of transition to adulthood in three cohort span, 1935-55, 1956-67, and 1968-84. Not only has the variability of these types increased overtime, life events of transition to adulthood occur later throughout the cohort span.
In addition, the study shows the duration of transition to adulthood extends over time, but the order of that remains mostly normative, with first marriage and first birth preceded by school completion and first full-time job and first birth preceded by first marriage. The order change only occurs between school completion and first full-time job. From the analysis of time interval of life events of transition to adulthood, the study discloses that the delay of first marriage, not first birth, is the main reason of the prolongation of transition to adulthood. This shows that first marriage’s effect on stopping transition to adulthood from extending in the early cohort has weakened in the later cohorts.
The effect of demographics on transition to adulthood varies. Sex and family socioeconomic status persist to have significant effect on transition to adulthood in different cohorts, while ethnic group has significant effect only in the early cohort, meaning the difference of transition to adulthood among ethnic groups has diminished over time. |
| Reference: | 參考文獻
Abbott, A., & Forrest, J., 1986, “Optimal Matching Methods for Historical Data.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 16(3): 473-496.
Abbott, A., & Tsay, A., 2000, “Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology.” Sociological Methods & Research, 29(1): 3-33.
Aassve, A., Billari, F.C., & Piccarreta, R., 2007, “String of Adulthood: A Sequence Analysis of Young British Women’s Work-Family Trajectories.” European Journal of Population, 23(3): 369-388.
Aquilino, W. S., 2006, “Family Relationships and Support System in Emerging Adulthood.” Pp. 193-217 in Emerging Adults in America: Coming of Age in the 21st Century, edited by J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Arnett, J. J., 1994, “Are College Students Adults? Their Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood.” Journal of Adult Development, 1:154-168.
Arnett, J. J., 2000, “Emerging Adulthood: A theory of Development from the Late Teens through the Twenties.” The American Psychologists, 55: 469-480.
Arnett, J. J., 2006, “Emerging Adulthood: Understanding the New Way of Coming of Age.” Pp. 3-19 in Emerging Adults in America: Coming of Age in the 21st Century, edited by J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bianchi, S. M., & Casper, L. M., 2000, “American Families.” Population Bulletin, 55: 1-44.
Billari, Francesco C., 2001, “The Analysis of Early Life Courses: Complex Descriptions of the Transitions to Adulthood.” Journal of Population Research, 18(2): 119-142.
Buchmann, M., 1989, The Script of Life in Modern Society: Entry into Adulthood in a Changing World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cook, T. D., & Furstenberg Jr., F. F., 2002, “Explaining Aspects of the Transition to Adulthood in Italy, Sweden, Germany, and the United States: A Cross-Disciplinary, Case Synthesis Approach.” THE ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 580: 255-287.
Duncan, O., D., Featherman, D. L. , & Duncan, B., 1974, “Socioeconomic Background and Achievement.” American Journal of Sociology, 79(6): 1497-1509.
Elder Jr., G. H., 1994, “Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspective on the Life Course.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 57: 4-15.
Elder Jr., G. H., Johnson, M. K., & Crosnoe, R., 2003, “The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory.” Pp. 3-19 in Handbook of the Life Course, edited by J. T. Mortimer & M.J. Shanahan. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Erikson, E. H., 1968, Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: W. W. Norton.
Esser, H., 1996, “What is Wrong with ‘Variable Sociology’?” European Sociological Review, 12(2): 159-166.
Fasang , A. E. & Liao, T. F., 2014, “Visualizing Sequences in the Social Science: Relative Frequency Sequnce Plots.” Sociological Methods & Research, 43(4): 643-676.
Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., Rumbaut, R. G., & Settersten, R. A., Jr., 2005, “On the Frontier of Adulthood: Emerging Themes and New Directions.” Pp. 3-25 in On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Fussell, E., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., 2005, “The Transition to Adulthood during the Twentieth Century: Race, Nativity, and Gender.” Pp. 29-75 in On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Fussell, E., & Gauthier, A. H., 2005, “American Women`s Transition to Adulthood in Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 76-109 in On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Studer, M., & Müller, N. S. (2011). “Mining Sequence Data in R with the TraMineR Package: A User`s Guide.” Retrieved from http://mephisto.unige.ch/traminer/ (Date visited: July 7, 2011).
Garrett, J. L., & Eccles, J. S., 2009, “Transition to Adulthood: Linking Late-Adolescent Lifestyle to Family and Work Status in the Mid-Twenties.” Pp. 243-264 in Transitions from School to Work: Globalization, Individual, and Patterns of Diversity, edited by I. Schoon & R. K. Silbereisen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gautheir, J.-A., Widmer, E. D., Bucher, P., & Notredame, C., 2010, “Multichannel Sequence Analysis Applied to Social Science Data.” Sociological Methodology, 40: 1-38.
Gayle, V., Lambert, P., & Murray, S., 2009, “School-to-Work in the 1990s: Modeling Transitions with Large-Scale Datasets.” Pp. 17-41 in Transitions from Education to Work: New Perspectives from Europe and Beyond, edited by R. Brooks. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giddens, A., 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.
Giele, J. Z., & Elder, G. H. J. (Eds.).,1998, Methods of Life Course Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. California: Sage Publications.
Goldscheider, F., & Goldscheider, C., 1993, “Whose Nest? A Two-Generation View of Leaving Home during the 1980s.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 851-862.
Hall, Stanley G., 1904, Adolescence: Its Psychology and Its Relations to Physiology, Anthropology, Sociology, Sex, Crime, Religion and Education. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
Hogan, D.P., 1981, Transitions and Social Change: The Early Lives of American Men. New York: Academic Press.
Keniston, K., 1970, “Youth, A New Stage of Life.” American Scholar, 39(4): 631-654.
Lesnard, L., Cousteaux, A.-S., Chanvril, F., & Le Hay, V., 2010, “Do Transitions to Adulthood Converge in Europe? An Optimal Matching Analysis of Work-Family Trajectories of Young Adults from 20 European Countries.” Retrieved from OSC CNRS, Sciences Po website http://spire.sciencespo.fr/hdl:/2441/3cr7jj61bs68cvg9988j0724o/resources/nd-2010-04.pdf. (Date visited: September 18, 2012).
Liao, T. F., & Fasang , A. E., 2014, “A Medoid-Based Method for Group Comparison of Life Course Sequence Data.” Paper presented at the Spring Meeting of Research Committee 28: Social Stratification and Mobility, Budapest, May 8-10. Abstract retrieved from http://www.asszisztencia.hu/casm2/upload/129/A-0351.pdf.
Marini, M. M., 1984, “The Order of Events in the Transition to Adulthood.” Sociology of Education, 57(2): 63-84.
McVicar, D., & Anyadike-Danes, M., 2002, “Predicting Successful and Unsuccessful Transitions from School to Work by Using Sequence Methods.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 165(2): 317-334.
Modell, J., 1989, Into One`s Own: From Youth to Adulthood, 1920-1975. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Modell, J., Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., & Hershberg, T., 1976, “Social Change and Transitions to Adulthood in Historical Perpective.” Journal of Family History, 1(1): 7-32.
Mouw, T., 2005, “Sequences of Early Adult Transition: A Look at Variability and Consequencs.” Pp. 256-291 in On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Oksanen, J., 2012, “Cluster Analysis: Tutorial with R.” http:// cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/opetus/metodi/sessio3.pdf. (Date visited: August 25, 2012).
Osgood, D. W., Foster, E. M., Flanagan, C., & Ruth, G. R., 2005, “Introduction: Why Focus on the Transition to Adulthood for Vulnerable Population?” Pp. 1-26 in On Your Own Without a Net: The Transition to Adulthood for Vulnerable Populations, edited by D. W. Osgood, E. M. Foster, C. Flanagan & G. R. Ruth. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Pollock, G., 2007, “Holistic Trajectories: A Study of Combined Employment, Housing and Family Careers by Using Multiple-Sequence Analysis.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 170(1): 167-183.
Ravanera, Z. R., Rajulton, F., & Burch, T., 1998, “Early Life Transitions of Canadian Women: A Cohort Analysis of Timing, Sequecnes, and Variations.” European Journal of Population, 14: 179-204.
Rindfuss, R. R., 1991, “The Young Adult Years: Diversity, Structural Change, and Fertility.” Demography, 28(4): 493-512.
Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, P. S., & Offutt, K., 1996, “Education and the Changing Age Pattern of Fertility.” Demography, 33(3): 277-290.
Rousseeuw, Reter, J., 1987, “Silhouettes: A Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster Analysis.” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20: 53-65.
Sandefur, G. D., Eggerling-Boeck, J., & Park, H., 2005, “Off to a Good Start? Postsecondary Education and Early Adult Life.” Pp. 292-319 in On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Schoen, R., Landale, N.S., & Daniels, K., 2007, “Family Transitions in Young Adulthood.” Demography, 44(4): 807-820.
Schoeni, R. F., & Ross, K. E., 2005, “Material Assistance from Families during the Transition to Adulthood.” Pp. 396-416 in On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Schoon, I., Ross, A., & Martin, P., 2009, “Sequence, Patterns, and Variations in the Assumption of Work and Family-Related Roles.” Pp. 219-224 in Transitions from School to Work: Globalization, Individual, and Patterns of Diversity, edited by I. Schoon & R. K. Silbereisen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Settersten Jr, R. A., & Hagestad, G. O., 1996, “What’s the Latest II ? Cultural Age Deadlines for Educational and Work Transitions.” The Gerontologist 36(5): 602-613.
Settersten Jr., R. A., 1997, “The Salience of Age in the Life Course.” Human Development, 40: 257-281.
Settersten Jr., R. A., 2003, “Age Structuring and the Rhythm of the Life Course.” Pp. 81-98 in Handbook of the Life Course, edited by J. T. Mortimer & M.J. Shanahan. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Shanahan, M. J., 2000, “Pathways to Adulthood in Changing Societies: Variability and Mechanisms in Life-Course.” Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 667-692.
Shanahan, M. J., & Longest, K. C., 2009, “Thinking about the Transition to Adulthood: From Grand Narratives to Useful Theories.” Pp. 30-41 in Transitions from School to Work: Globalization, Individual, and Patterns of Diversity, edited by I. Schoon & R. K. Silbereisen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shanahan, M. J., Porfeli, E. J., Mortimer, J. T., & Erickson, L. D., 2005, “Subjective Age Identity and the Transition to Adulthood: When Do Adolescence become Adults?” Pp. 225-255 in On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Smeeding, T. M., & Phillips, K. R., 2002, “Cross-National Differences in Employment and Economics Sufficiency.” THE ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 580: 103-133.
Studer, M., 2013, “WeightedCluster Library Manual: A practical guide to creating typologies of trajectories in the social sciences with R.” LIVES Working Papers, 24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12682/lives.2296-1658.2013.24. (Date visited: July 15, 2012).
Walther, A., 2009, “‘It Was Not My Choice, You Know?’ Young People’s Subjective Views and Decision-Making Processes in Biographical Transitions.” Pp. 121-144 in Transitions from School to Work: Globalization, Individual, and Patterns of Diversity, edited by I. Schoon & R. K. Silbereisen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, L. L., & Li, J.-C. A., 2005, “Historical Roots of Family Diversity: Marital and Childbearing Trajectories of American Women.” Pp. 110-149 in On the Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr. & R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
王甫昌，1993，〈光復後台灣漢人族群通婚的原因與形式初探〉。《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》76: 43-96。
內政部統計處，2011，〈我國婦女婚育歷程之變遷趨勢及長期推計分析〉。http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/topic.aspx，取用日期：2014年9月14日。
行政院主計處，2003，〈原住民族人口概況之研析〉。http://www.stat.gov.tw/fp.asp?xItem=1669&CtNode=548，取用日期：2014年8月1日。
范雲、張晉芬，2010，〈再探台灣高教育成就的省籍差異〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》79: 259-290。
翁志遠，1998，《一九九○年臺灣地區人口之婚姻狀況分佈的省籍差異探討》。國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
陳信木，2003，《臺灣地區客家人口之婚配模式：世代、地理區域、與社經地位比較分析》。行政院客家委員會獎助客家學術研究計畫。
張建成，1994，《光復以來山胞之教育及其家庭相關因素之探討》。國科會研究報告。
駱明慶，2001，〈教育成就的省籍與性別差異〉。《經濟論文叢刊》29(2) : 117-152。
鍾基年，1993，《族群特質與職業生涯：外省族群從事軍公教行業原因之探討》。台北：國立清華大學社會人類研究所碩士論文。 |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
社會學系
96254502 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096254502 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 450201.pdf | 2331Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 838 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
