English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51788541      Online Users : 549
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/99770
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99770


    Title: 網路口碑型態與社會線索對口碑信任影響之研究
    The Effects of Social Clue Implied in Two Types of eWoM for Trust on eWoM
    Authors: 陳俞仲
    Chen, Yu Zhong
    Contributors: 管郁君
    陳俞仲
    Chen, Yu Zhong
    Keywords: 網路口碑
    社會線索
    內源性口碑
    外源性口碑
    eWoM
    social clue
    endogenous WoM
    exogenous WoM
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-08-09 10:45:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著網際網路時代的來臨,網路口碑逐漸變成消費者購買決策時重要的參考依據。而口碑依據來源不同,分為內源性口碑及外源性口碑,且兩者皆透過社會線索的暗示影響消費者對於口碑的信任。本研究先蒐集相關文獻並彙整出影響口碑信任的因素——社會線索。接著探討兩種口碑類型中,社會線索對於口碑信任的影響。本研究共收回880份有效問卷,並透過最小平方法(PLS)及多群分析,進行有效樣本之實證分析。結果顯示,在社會線索中,感知權威性、感知真實性及感知內容特質皆顯著地影響消費者對於口碑的信任程度,且隨著口碑類型的不同,消費者所重視的社會線索也不相同。在內源性口碑情境中,消費者較外源性口碑情境更加注重口碑的感知真實性。在外源性口碑情境中,則消費者較內源性情境更加注重口碑的感知權威性。因此,本研究認為企業除了維持內源性口碑的行銷活動外,應當對於外源性口碑的經營有著相等的注意力。
    This study explores the effects of social clue implied in the two types of eWoM (electronic word-of-mouth) for the trust on eWoM. With the development of the Internet, online word of mouth (eWoM) gradually be taken as an important reference for consumers when they make a purchase decision. According to different sources of eWoM, eWoM can be divided into endogenous eWoM and exogenous eWoM, and both affect consumers’ trust on WoM through the social clue of eWoM. First, this study collected relevant literature and aggregated the factors affecting the trust on eWoM, and this study call the factors the social clue. Then this study investigate the effects of the social clue of the two types of eWoM for the trust on eWoM and process the validity sample analysis by PLS. Hypotheses on type of eWoM could be tested by statistically comparing corresonding path coefficients in the structural models. The survey results from 880 participants of an online forum suggest that the social clue of eWoM is significantly associated with the trust on eWoM, and the results vary with the types of eWoM. The contribution of this study demonstrate the importance of the social clue of eWoM, and they carry important practical implications for business.
    Reference: Awad, N. F., & Ragowsky, A. (2008). Establishing trust in electronic commerce through online word of mouth: An examination across genders. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 101-121.
    Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of service research, 3(2), 166-177.
    Benedicktus, R. L., & Andrews, M. L. (2006). Building trust with consensus information: The effects of valence and sequence direction. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 3-25.
    Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral?. Journal of marketing research, 49(2), 192-205.
    Berger, J., & Schwartz, E. M. (2011). What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth?. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 869-880.
    Conrad, J. G., Leidner, J. L., & Schilder, F. (2008). Professional credibility: authority on the web. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Information credibility on the web (pp. 85-88). ACM.
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research, 3(1), 60-95.
    DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007). Rumors influence: Toward a dynamic social impact theory of rumor (Doctoral dissertation, Psychology Press).
    Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. the Journal of Marketing, 35-51.
    Gefen, D., & Ridings, C. M. (2005). If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: a sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities. ACM SIGMIS Database, 36(2), 78-92.
    Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing science, 23(4), 545-560.
    Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2009). Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Science, 28(4), 721-739.
    Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 1360-1380.
    Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
    Hornik, J., Satchi, R. S., Cesareo, L., & Pastore, A. (2015). Information dissemination via electronic word-of-mouth: Good news travels fast, bad news travels faster!. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 273-280.
    Huang, M., Cai, F., Tsang, A. S., & Zhou, N. (2011). Making your online voice loud: the critical role of WOM information. European Journal of Marketing, 45(7/8), 1277-1297.
    Kamins, M. A., Folkes, V. S., & Perner, L. (1997). Consumer responses to rumors: Good news, bad news. Journal of consumer psychology, 6(2), 165-187.
    Keil, M., Tan, B. C., Wei, K. K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V., & Wassenaar, A. (2000). A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS quarterly, 299-325.
    Koehn, D. (2003). The nature of and conditions for online trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1-2), 3-19.
    McGuire, W. J. (1976). Some internal psychological factors influencing consumer choice. Journal of Consumer research, 302-319.
    Mitra, A., & Watts, E. (2002). Theorizing cyberspace: the idea of voice applied to the internet discourse. New media & society, 4(4), 479-498.
    Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 145-161.
    Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn Free Press. New York.
    Seeberger, B., Schwarting, U., & Meiners, N. (2010). The Renaissance of Word-of-Mouth Marketing: A`New`Standard in Twenty-First Century Marketing Management?!. International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, (2), 79-97.
    Sernovitz, A. (2009). Word of mouth marketing: How smart companies get people talking. New York: Kaplan.
    Shi, Z., Rui, H., & Whinston, A. B. (2013). Content sharing in a social broadcasting environment: evidence from twitter. Available at SSRN 2341243.
    Strebel, J., Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (2004). Consumer search in high technology markets: Exploring the use of traditional information channels. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 96-104.
    Strong, F. K. (1925). The Psychology of Selling, McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
    Taylor, R. S. (1986). Value-added processes in information systems. Greenwood Publishing Group.
    Wang, Y. S. (2008). Assessing e‐commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Journal, 18(5), 529-557.
    Weenig, M. W., & Midden, C. J. (1991). Communication network influences on information diffusion and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 734.
    Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
    Wojnicki, A. C., & Godes, D. (2008). Word-of-mouth as self-enhancement. HBS marketing research paper, (06-01).
    Yang, S., Hu, M., Winer, R. S., Assael, H., & Chen, X. (2012). An empirical study of word-of-mouth generation and consumption. Marketing Science, 31(6), 952-963.

    網路資料
    2015年台灣數位廣告量統計報告 (2016) Retrieved August 2, 2016, from http://www.dma.org.tw/
    3C產品消費意識大調查 (2015) Retrieved August 2, 2016, from http://www.techbang.com/posts/22680-ul-x-t-states-3c-consumer-awareness-survey-value-for-money-than-its-consumers-only-take-into-account-buy-fun-with-peace-of-mind
    Chin, W. W. (2000). Frequently Asked Questions – Partial Least Squares & PLS-Graph. Retrieved June 12, 2016, from http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/plsfac/plsfac.htm.
    GLOBAL TRUST IN ADVERTISING (2015) Retrieved December 28, 2015, from http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2015-reports/global-trust-in-advertising-report-sept-2015.pdf
    Internet Live Stats (2015) Retrieved November 27, 2015, from http://www.internetlivestats.com/
    研究案例: 口碑小調查 (2010) Retrieved November 26, 2015, from http://news.ixresearch.com/?p=2525
    新品最佳宣傳管道:親朋好友口碑相傳 (2015) Retrieves December 3, 2015, from http://www.nielsen.com/tw/zh/press-room/2015/news-innovation-product-in-taiwan.html
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    103356025
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103356025
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    602501.pdf1505KbAdobe PDF285View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback