English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 52624834      Online Users : 992
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/99552
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99552


    Title: 透過最佳化社會資本實現嬰兒潮顧客的社會幸福
    Achieving social wellbeing of baby boomers through optimizing social capital
    Authors: 廖庭毅
    Liao, Ting Yi
    Contributors: 苑守慈
    Yuan, Soe Tysr
    廖庭毅
    Liao, Ting Yi
    Keywords: 社會資本
    社會幸福
    戰後嬰兒潮
    社交關係
    最大化社會資本
    Social capital
    social wellbeing
    baby boomer
    relationship
    maximize social capital
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-08-02 17:02:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在1946至1964年之間出生的戰後嬰兒潮,奉獻了大半輩子在於工作,因此擁有較 高的收入以及較充裕的自由時間。毫無疑問地,他們是最有資格也最值得去追求 幸福的族群了。
    這篇論文基於PERMA這個模型對於幸福所提出的五個元素,針對其中的“社交 關係”進行研究。並以社會資本來當作研究的核心,近而探討線上以及線下的行 為對於社會資本所造成的影響。
    在這篇論文中,我們會透過所設計的機制,來量化個體的社會資本。並利用活動 導向的推薦來增加以及最佳化個體的社會資本。更希望可以透過人與人之間的強 弱連結,使彼此之間互相影響,共同創造更大的社會資本以及更好的社交關係。 透過我們的機制,系統可以了解嬰兒潮顧客的社交情形,並推薦適合他們從事的 社交活動。
    長期來看,我們認為微觀的社會資本可以影響到宏觀的社會資本。如同個體可以 影響到其所在的群體一樣。研究最後的目標是幫助嬰兒潮顧客達到社會幸福,並 創造一個使用者可以共同創造價值的生態系。
    Baby boomers, which mean people who were born between 1946 and 1964, devoted most of their life at work. Because of the high income and free time they have, they undoubtedly are the most capable but also the most worthy to pursue wellbeing. This paper will focus on one of the elements of wellbeing, which is the relationship part of PERMA model. The core of this research is on social capital that is related to user`s behaviors online and offline. In this research, we want to quantify each user’s social capital, and then increase and maximize it through our particularly devised mechanism. By the strong or weak ties between users, they could co-create higher social capital and better relationships. Through our mechanism, we can understand baby boomers’ social situation and improve it by recommending virtual and physical activities. In the long term, we thought micro social capital can affect macro social capital, as a person can affect others. The final goal of this research is helping baby boomers achieve social wellbeing and create an ecosystem for users to co-create value in relationships.
    Reference: 1. Antheunis, M. L., Vanden Abeele, M. M., & Kanters, S. (2015). The Impact of Facebook Use on Micro-Level Social Capital: A Synthesis. Societies, 5(2), 399-419.
    2. American Association of Retired Persons. (2004). A growing market: Expenditures by the older population-analysis from the Consumer Expenditure Survey. Beyond 50.04: A report to the nation on consumers in the marketplace: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
    3. Anderson, L. S., & Heyne, L. A. (2012). Flourishing through leisure: An ecological extension of the leisure and well-being model in therapeutic recreation strengths-based practice. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 46(2), 129.
    4. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). Réponses: pour une anthropologie réflexive (p. 129). Paris: Seuil.
    5. Boudieu, Pierre and J. D. Wacquant (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. The University of Chicago Press.
    6. Buchanan, M. (2003). Nexus: small worlds and the groundbreaking theory of networks. WW Norton & Company.
    7. Census bureau (2014). Median Income By Age And Sex In America. http://www.financialsamurai.com/median-income-by-age-and-sex-in-america/
    8. Chi, L., Chan, W. K., Seow, G., & Tam, K. (2009). Transplanting social capital to the online world: Insights from two experi- mental studies. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 19(3), 214-236.
    9. Couto, R. A., & Guthrie, C. S. (1999). Making Democracy Work Better: Mediating Structures. Social Capital, and the Democratic Prospect. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    10. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(supplement), S95-S120.
    11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Basic Books.
    12. De Souza Briggs, X. (1997). Social capital and the cities: Advice to change agents. National Civic Review, 86(2), 111-117.
    102
    13. Eakman, A. M., Carlson, M. E., & Clark, F. A. (2010). The meaningful activity participation assessment: A measure of engagement in personally valued activities. Th Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and households in economic growth, 89, 89-125.e International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 70(4), 299-317.
    14. Ellison, N.B.; Steinfield, C.; Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2007, 12, 1143–1168.
    15. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals` social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336.
    16. Grootaert, C. (Ed.). (2004). Measuring social capital: An integrated questionnaire (No. 18). World Bank Publications.
    17. Grootaert, Christiaan and Thierry van Bastelaer (2002a), The Role of Social Capital in Developmen: An Empirical Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    18. Halpern, D. Social Capital; Polity Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005.
    19. Krishna, A., & Shrader, E. (1999, June). Social capital assessment tool. In conference on social capital and poverty reduction, World Bank, Washington,
    DC (Vol. 22, p. 24).
    20. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the
    organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
    21. Park, C. L. (2014). Integrating positive psychology into health-related quality of
    life research. Quality of Life Research, 1-7.
    22. Putnam, R. D. (1995a). Bowling alone: Amer- ica’s declining social capital.
    Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
    23. Putnam, R. D. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of
    social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Poli- tics, 28(4), 664-683.
    24. Rafaeli, S., Ravid, G., & Soroka, V. (2004, Ja- nuary). De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital. The Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International
    Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii, U.S..
    103
    25. Realo, A., & Allik, J. (2009). On the relationship between social capital and individualism–collectivism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 871-886.
    26. ROC DGBAS (2014). http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1
    27. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourishing.
    28. StatCounter (2014).
    http://blog.wis.com.tw/2015/editorial/facebook-advertising-knowhow/
    29. Statista (2015). Number of social network users worldwide from 2010 to 2018.
    http://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-
    users/
    30. Steger, M. F. (2012). Experiencing meaning in life. The human quest for
    meaning: Theories, research, and applications, 165-184.
    31. Similarweb (2016).
    https://www.similarweb.com/blog/worldwide-messaging-apps
    32. Sweeney, P. (2014). The Silver Realigning: How Baby Boomers Can Become
    More Positive and Find New Meaning After Losing Their Jobs.
    33. TCS (2014).
    http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/ResultsShow_detail.asp?RS_ID=37
    34. Thirumalai, M., & Ramaprasad, A. (2015, January). Ontological Analysis of the Research on the Use of Social Media for Health Behavior Change. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 814-823).
    IEEE.
    35. Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital
    and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly,
    29(1), 35-57.
    36. Welch, P. J., & Putnam, R. D. (2005). Bowling Alone.
    37. Wiertz, C., & de Ruyter, K. (2007). Beyond the call of duty: Why customers
    contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organization Studies,
    28(3), 347-376.
    38. 江明修, & 陳欽春. (1998). 充實社會資本之研究. 國家建設計畫研擬專題研
    究系列 IIII, 42(2), 177.
    39. 林奇秀, & 陳一帆. (2011). 淺析網路社群知識分享實證研究如何構思社會
    資本概念. 圖書資訊學刊, 9(2), 55-89.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    103356036
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103356036
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    603601.pdf7165KbAdobe PDF290View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback