政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99551
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51687683      Online Users : 705
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of MIS > Theses >  Item 140.119/99551


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99551


    Title: 透過高齡幸福價值最大化達到成功的在地老化
    Successful Aging through Senior Well-being Valuation and Maximization
    Authors: 謝承豫
    Hsieh, Cheng Yu
    Contributors: 苑守慈
    Yuan, Soe Tsyr
    謝承豫
    Hsieh, Cheng Yu
    Keywords: 幸福
    價值最大化
    多維度評價
    穿戴式裝置
    戰後嬰兒潮
    Well-being
    Value maximization
    Multi-dimension evaluation
    Wearable devices
    Baby boomers
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-08-02 17:01:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 大多數的已開發國家都逐漸成為高齡化社會；同時，可以幫助高齡族群的科技發明變得越來越流行和重要。本研究提出一個以穿戴式裝置為基礎的服務系統，不只專注在健康，也重視正向情緒、投入程度、人際關係、人生意義和成就感（PERMA，幸福模型）。本系統的目標是透過以活動為基礎的介入，促進幸福價值；亦即透過整合服務系統內的所有資源以提供個人化的活動介入給戰後嬰兒潮族群，並整合子系統的最佳化機制以得到整體的價值最大化。
    因為幸福被定義為一種多維度的觀念，為了衡量並評價幸福，我們使用一個以影子價格為基礎的計算矩陣來比較各個活動介入的價值。透過幸福價值最大化，本研究試著幫助戰後嬰兒潮族群成功的在地老化。本研究初探性的結果指出，此系統被證實是有效的，且活動介入有能力增加使用者感受的幸福價值，介入品質和高齡幸福評價被發現有高度關聯性。
    Most of the societies of developed countries are becoming “aging population society”. Technologies that help baby boomers stay healthy become more popular and essential. We propose a wearable-device-based service system that focused not only on vitality but also positive emotion, engagement, relationship, meaning and accomplishment (PERMA as well-being model). Since the system aims at improving well-being value through activity-based interventions, it is necessary to integrate all the resources within the service system and provide the most appropriate personalized interventions with most expected value to the baby boomers. The system generates those interventions through greedy approach, which means they are generated by local mechanism first and combine them to get the global optimality.
    In order to measure well-being, which is definitely a multi-dimensional concept, we use an evaluation matrix based on shadow price to compare the value between each intervention, i.e. activities. By the well-being valuation and maximization, we try to make the baby boomers live a successful aging. Our exploratory evaluations show that the system is justified to be effective and activity-based interventions are able to increase baby boomers’ perceived value. The correlation between intervention quality and senior well-being valuation is found along with other findings.
    Reference: [1] American Association of Retired Persons (AARP). (2004). a growing market: Expenditures by the older population-analysis from the Consumer Expenditure Survey. Beyond 50.04: A report to the nation on consumers in the marketplace: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute. http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/consume/beyond_50_cons_2.pdf. Accessed 14.02.07.
    [2] Andrews, F. M., & McKennell, A. C. (1980). Measures of self-reported well-being: Their affective, cognitive, and other components. Social Indicators Research, 8(2), 127-155.
    [3] Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American perceptions of quality of life. The Management Group.
    [4] Baines, T. S., Lightfoot, H. W., Evans, S., Neely, A., Greenough, R., Peppard, J., ... & Wilson, H. (2007). State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 221(10), 1543-1552.
    [5] Ballou, M. B. (1995). Psychological interventions: A guide to strategies. Greenwood Publishing Group.
    [6] Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being.
    [7] Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. Adaptation-level theory, 287-305.
    [8] Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation.
    [9] Cameron, K. S. (2012). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
    [10] Chen, Z., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2003). A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e‐commerce: A preliminary investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 20(4), 323-347.
    [11] Chr. Hjorth-Andersen. (1984). The concept of quality and the efficiency of markets for consumer products. Journal of Consumer Research, 708-718.
    [12] Cormen, T. H. (2009). Introduction to algorithms. MIT press. Chapter 16 "Greedy Algorithms".
    [13] Cronin Jr, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. The journal of marketing, 55-68.
    [14] Deaton, A. (2007). Income, aging, health and wellbeing around the world: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll (No. w13317). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    [15] DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research, 3(1), 60-95.
    [16] Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social indicators research, 40(1-2), 189-216.
    [17] Diener, E., Suh, E., Oishi, S., & Triandis, H. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(2), 482.
    [18] Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). 11 Personality and Subjective Well-Being. Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology, 213.
    [19] Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index (Vol. 55, No. 1, p. 34). American Psychological Association.
    [20] Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual review of psychology, 54(1), 403-425.
    [21] Dodds, W. B., & Monroe, K. B. (1985). The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. Advances in consumer research, 12(1), 85-90.
    [22] Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: Recommendations on measures.
    [23] Eakman, A. M., Carlson, M. E., & Clark, F. A. (2010). The meaningful activity participation assessment: A measure of engagement in personally valued activities. Th Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and households in economic growth, 89, 89-125.e International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 70(4), 299-317.
    [24] Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35-47.
    [25] Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11176-11183.
    [26] Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys (Vol. 78). Springer Science & Business Media.
    [27] Forgeard, M. J., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2011). Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1).
    [28] Forrester, J., Gerger Swartling, Å., & Lonsdale, K. (2008). Stakeholder Engagement and the work of SEI: An empirical study.
    [29] Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research?. Journal of Economic literature, 402-435.
    [30] Ghosh, R., Ratan, S., Lindeman, D., & Steinmetz, V. (2013). The new era of connected aging: A framework for understanding technologies that support older adults in aging in place. Oakland, CA: Center for Technology and Aging.
    [31] Heckman, J. (1974). Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrica: journal of the econometric society, 679-694.
    [32] Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2001). Happiness, introversion–extraversion and happy introverts. Personality and individual Differences, 30(4), 595-608.
    [33] Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health.
    [34] Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
    [35] Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111-126.
    [36] Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: lessons form a New Science. London: Allen Lane.
    [37] Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2005). Financial literacy and planning: Implications for retirement wellbeing. Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper No. WP, 108.
    [38] Martin, L. G., Freedman, V. A., Schoeni, R. F., & Andreski, P. M. (2009). Health and functioning among baby boomers approaching 60. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, gbn040.
    [39] Michalos, A. C. (1980). Satisfaction and happiness. Social indicators research, 8(4), 385-422.
    [40] Moschis, G. P. (2003). Marketing to older adults: an updated overview of present knowledge and practice. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(6), 516-525.
    [41] Munda, G. (2014). On the use of shadow prices for sustainable well-being measurement. Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 911-918.
    [42] Neugarten, B. L., Havighurst, R. J., & Tobin, S. S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of gerontology.
    [43] O`Donnell, R. (2008). The Concept of Opportunity Cost: Is it Simple Fundamental or Necessary?. Available at SSRN 1333850. Palmer, S., & Raftery, J. (1999). Economics notes: Opportunity cost. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 318(7197), 1551.
    [44] Pantelopoulos, A., & Bourbakis, N. G. (2010). A survey on wearable sensor-based systems for health monitoring and prognosis. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 40(1), 1-12.
    [45] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). ES-QUAL a multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of service research, 7(3), 213-233.
    [46] Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [47] Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603-619.
    [48] Pollack, M. E. (2005). Intelligent technology for an aging population: The use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. AI magazine, 26(2), 9.
    [49] Roy, B., & Vanderpooten, D. (1996). The European school of MCDA: Emergence, basic features and current works. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 5(1), 22-38.
    [50] Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.
    [51] Seligman, M. E. P. (2010). Flourish: Positive psychology and positive interventions. The Tanner lectures on human values, 7.
    [52] Seligman, M. E. (2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Simon and Schuster.
    [53] Sen, A. (2002). Health: perception versus observation: self reported morbidity has severe limitations and can be extremely misleading. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 324(7342), 860.
    [54] Steptoe, A. S., & Butler, N. (1996). Sports participation and emotional wellbeing in adolescents. The Lancet, 347(9018), 1789-1792.
    [55] Stiakakis, E., & Georgiadis, C. K. (2011, June). A model to identify the dimensions of mobile service quality. In 2011 10th International Conference on Mobile Business (pp. 195-204). IEEE.
    [56] Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited. Reflections and overview. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris.
    [57] Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological bulletin, 103(2), 193.
    [58] Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing science, 4(3), 199-214.
    [59] Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business strategy and the environment, 13(4), 246-260.
    [60] Veenhoven, R., & Hagerty, M. (2006). Rising happiness in nations 1946–2004: A reply to Easterlin. Social Indicators Research, 79(3), 421-436.
    [61] Wessman, A. E., & Ricks, D. F. (1966). Mood and personality.
    [62] Wiedmann, K. P., Hennigs, N., & Siebels, A. (2007). Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: A cross-cultural framework. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 7(7), 333-361.
    [63] Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 2-22.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    103356028
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103356028
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of MIS] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    602801.pdf2380KbAdobe PDF251View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback