政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98998
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 115551/146583 (79%)
造訪人次 : 55513864      線上人數 : 36
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98998


    題名: The New Development of the Knowledge Requirement of Induced Infringement under the American Patent Law
    作者: 陳秉訓
    Chen, Ping-Hsun
    貢獻者: 科管智財所
    關鍵詞: American patent law;inducement;Global-Tech;indirect infringement;patent infringemen
    日期: 2013-12
    上傳時間: 2016-07-13 11:38:05 (UTC+8)
    摘要: The United States has the most pro-inventor patent system which provides a full range of remedies for patentees facing infringement. 35 U.S.C. § 271 (b) provides, ”Whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer.” So, a person accused of active inducement does not infringe the claimed invention directly. Instead, another person directly exploits the claimed invention. In 2011, the Supreme Court in Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A. interpreted the knowledgment requirement of § 271 (b) to mandate that the plaintiff has to prove that an inducer knew the patent-in-suit and the patent infringement. The Supreme Court clarified that there is no negligent or reckless inducer. However, what was not clear is whether the ”should have known” standard has been abrogated because the Supreme Court did not express that. After the Federal Circuit`s Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc. in 2013, the ”should have known” standard was finally removed from the knowledge requirement. After Global-Tech, there were several district court decisions applying Global-Tech. This article analyzed several early district court decisions and found no effect on the traditional practice of finding inducement.
    關聯: NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Management, 2(2), 72-112
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6521/NTUTJIPLM.2013.2(2).1
    DOI: 10.6521/NTUTJIPLM.2013.2(2).1
    顯示於類別:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    409655.pdf252KbAdobe PDF2313檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋