English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51772720      Online Users : 155
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98037


    Title: 議會至上與人大至上——從英國違憲審查的發展看中國違憲審查的未來
    Authors: 劉定基
    Liu, Ting-Chi
    Keywords: 違憲審查;英國;中國;議會至上;人大至上
    Constitutional Review;Judicial Review;the United Kingdom;China;Supremacy of Parliament;Supremacy of People’s Congress
    Date: 2013-12
    Issue Date: 2016-06-20 11:01:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中國雖於一九五四年即通過公布第一部憲法，但憲法作為國家根本大法的規範性格，並未同時確立。隨著市場經濟的持續發展，如何進一步落實憲法根本大法的規範效力，回應人權保護的要求，建構法律及行政法規牴觸憲法時的違憲審查或監督機制，遂成為一項重點課題。本文擬借鏡採取與「人大至上」相似的「議會至上」原則的英國違憲審查制度發展經驗，探究中國司法機關在違憲審查制度中可能扮演的角色，特別是若尊重中國憲法文本，採取以人民大會常務委員會為中心的違憲審查機制下，各級法院是否仍有參與法規合憲控制的空間？又該如何參與？凡此，均是本文研究的核心問題。
    In 1954, the People’s Republic of China promulgated its first constitution; however, at the time, the idea that the constitution is the supreme law of the land was not established. As China’s market economy continues to grow, how to carry out the fundamental mandate of the Constitution, respond to the demand for human rights protection, and create an effective system of constitutional review on laws and regulations become important issues. Based on the development of constitutional review in the United Kingdom under the doctrine of “supremacy of Parliament,” which is similar to the Chinese principle of “supremacy of People’s Parliament,” this article will explore the potential roles that Chinese courts can play in China’s constitutional review process. As the Chinese Constitution explicitly specifies that the Standing Committee of the People’s Congress has the authority to interpret the Constitution and to invalidate subordinate legislation, special attention will be paid to the questions whether and how the Chinese courts can perform constitutional review on parliamentary legislation and other subordinate regulations.
    Relation: 法學評論, 135,255-306頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202013120135004
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202013120135004
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    135-4.pdf1114KbAdobe PDF2505View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback