English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51772964      Online Users : 397
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98014


    Title: 身分犯之正犯的認定——以德國義務犯理論為中心
    Other Titles: The Concept of the Principal Offender on Crimes Demanding the Perpetrator`s Special Status (Sonderdelikte): A Study on Offense of Duty
    Authors: 陳志輝
    Chen, Jyh-Huei
    Keywords: 身分犯;義務犯;保證人身分犯;正犯
    Crimes Demanding the Perpetrator’s Special Status;Offense of Duty;Crimes Demanding the Perpetrator’s Special Guaranteed Status;Principal Offender
    Date: 2012-12
    Issue Date: 2016-06-17 16:44:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 身分犯的正犯，原則上只限定於具備特定身分資格之人。但是透過我國刑法第31條第1項的規定，將身分犯的正犯擴及至不具身分資格之人，此種擴張是否具有正當性，本文將從立法史的角度進行分析，並整理相關支持此項擬制正犯規定的見解。此外，既然不具身分資格之人無論如何都無法成立身分犯之正犯，這代表無身分資格之人與有身分資格之人在不法內涵上有所區別，因此本文嘗試從德文文獻中嘗試找出身分犯的實質不法內涵，評析各種解決方案，確立身分犯的實質不法內涵應以何種標準來確立。
    The offenders of Crimes demanding the perpetrator’s special Status are in principle limited to persons who have the specific identity or qualification. However, according to Article 31, section 1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of China, perpetrators, who take part in the commission of the offense, which has been established on the basis of personal or other special relationship due to one of the perpetrators’\\r special status, shall be considered as principal offenders, even including the ones without special status. This means, the designation of a principal offender could be expanded to a person without special status. Is this expansion justified? This thesis tries to analyze Article 31, section 1 of the Criminal Code from the view of legislative history and the arguments in favor of its justification. In addition, any extraneous person should never be classified as the principal offender of Crimes demanding the perpetrator’s special Status. It means that there exists an essential distinction in the illegal connotation between perpetrators with or without special status. Therefore, this thesis attempts to find out the substantive illegal connotation of Crimes demanding the perpetrator’s special Status and evaluate various possible solutions in order to elaborate which kind of standards could be built up for the substantive illegal connotation of Crimes demanding the perpetrator’s special Status.
    Relation: 法學評論, 130,331-418頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    130-6.pdf1177KbAdobe PDF2370View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback