政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/97862
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51633303      Online Users : 539
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97862


    Title: 臺灣學術研究資源的分配--教師知覺與歸因理論
    Other Titles: Factors Influencing Access to Academic Resources in Taiwan--Testing the Attribution Theory of Faculty Perception
    Authors: 田芳華
    Keywords: 高等教育 ; 學術資源 ; 研究生產力 ; 歸因理論 ; 國科會
    Higher education ; Academic resource ; Research productivity ; Attribution theory ; National Science Council
    Date: 2003-03
    Issue Date: 2016-06-13 11:07:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 從事研究是大學的主要任務之一。研究的進行需要資源。本研究旨在瞭解台灣學術界同仁對於四類研究資源獲得與否的影響因素意見。探求的學術資源包括:(1)國科會科技人才培育計畫(教師及研究人員進修),(2)國科專題研究計畫,(3)國科會研究獎勵,與(4)國科會以外其他機構構之研究計畫。影響因素則有:申請者的研究表現、研究計畫的重要性、在學術界的人脈關系、在經費補助機構中的人脈關係、申請者服務機構的聲望、運費和其他等。本研究除了比較各類學術經費申請之通過與否的因素影響之之外,亦測試歸因理論,並呈現受訪者人口變項、服務機構、研究表現、與是否獲得該種學術經費等變項在不同學術經費項目上意見的差異。
    The purpose of this study is to explore faculty perceptions on the major factors of winning academic resources in Taiwan. Four different types of academic resources investigated in this article are:(1)The NSC(National Science Council)Study and Sabbatical Grant;(2)The NSC Research Proposal Grant;(3)The NSC Research Outcome Grant;and (4)grants from other Non-NSC institutions. Seven major factors are explored. They are:research performance of the applicant, the importance of a research proposal, the applicant’s personal network in the academic community, the applicant’s personal network in the granting institution, the prestige of the applicant’s institution, luck, and other factors. The results indicate that the relative importance of factors varies with different types of research grants. Among different factors, research performance and the importance of a research proposal are rated as the most influential ones for wining academic resources. Compared to the grants distributed by the NSC, the importance of a personal network in the granting institution was ranked higher in winning the N-non-NSC research grants. The results also show that the attribution theory is supported by the data. Faculty who won academic resources expressed different ranking patterns from faculty who did not. The former tend to rank research performance higher than the latter, and the latter tend to rate the importance of a personal network and institutional prestige higher than those who won resources.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 26(1),133-165
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Education & Psychology] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2283View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML2371View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback