English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51826652      Online Users : 562
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 會計評論 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/97166


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97166


    Title: 會計師事務所與管理顧問公司聯盟之經營績效探討
    Other Titles: Audit Firms’ Alliance with Consulting Firms for Management Advisory Services and Operational Performance
    Authors: 陳燕錫;陳瓊燕
    Chen, Yahn-Shir;Chen;Chiung-Yen
    Keywords: 會計師事務所;管顧公司;聯盟;績效
    Audit firms;Consulting firms;Alliance;Performance
    Date: 2014-07
    Issue Date: 2016-06-01 14:24:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討會計師事務所採取聯盟方式提供管理顧問業務對經營績效之影響。先將會計師事務區分為全國型、區域型與地方型三種規模類型，再依Miles and Snow (1978)將事務所區分為防禦者與分析者兩種策略類型。實證結果發現，當不考慮事策略類型時，不論全國型、區域型或地方型事務所，與管理顧問公司有聯盟者之經營績效皆勝過無聯盟者。若進一步考慮事務所採取之策略類型，當全國型事務所採取防禦者策略時，有聯盟者之績效並未優於無聯盟者。另外，提供管理顧問業務時，事務所應採取聯盟方式或由事務所本身較為有利？實證發現，在全國型事務所，由事務所本身提供對績效較有利；在區域型事務所，聯盟與否並沒有顯著的績效影響；在地方型事務所，採取防禦者策略且以聯盟方式提供管理顧問業務者之績效顯著優於採取分析者策略且非以聯盟方式提供者。
    This study investigates audit firms about the relation between providing management advisory service (MAS) through alliance with consulting firms and operational performance. The audit firms in our sample are classified into national, regional, and local firms. Based on Miles and Snow (1978), the audit firms are further classified as defender and analyzer, according to their organizational strategies. Our empirical results indicate that, for all of national, regional and local audit firms, those providing MAS through alliance with consulting firms show better performance than those without the alliance. However, we further consider the audit firm’ s organizational strategies and find that our national firms using defender strategy show worse performance with the allied consulting firms than without the alliance when providing MAS. We further examine whether the audit firms are more profitable rendering MAS by themselves or by alliance with consulting firms. The empirical results reveal that national firms are more profitable if providing MAS by themselves than by allied consulting firms. Regional firms show indifferent performance under both alternatives. However, local audit firms show better performance in the case of defenders providing MAS by allied consulting firms than the case of analyzers providing MAS without allied consulting firms.
    Relation: 會計評論, 59,73-105頁
    International Journal of Accounting Studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[會計評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    59-3.pdf453KbAdobe PDF2566View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback