政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/97121
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51695675      線上人數 : 613
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97121


    題名: 美國歐盟及台灣價格具結措施之比較分析
    The comparative analysis of Price Undertakings under the U.S., the EU, and Taiwan’s Anti-dumping law
    作者: 張瑞紋
    Chang, Jui Wen
    貢獻者: 莊奕琦
    Chuang, Yih Chyi
    張瑞紋
    Chang, Jui Wen
    關鍵詞: 價格具結
    中止協議
    反傾銷
    Price Undertaking
    Suspension Agreement
    Anti-Dumping
    日期: 2015
    上傳時間: 2016-06-01 13:56:02 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 目前，有3件反傾銷案採行價格具結措施，包括原產於中國之毛巾，鞋靴及冷軋不銹鋼等涉案產品。財政部於鞋靴反傾銷案接受82家具結廠商，每季海關人員須監督該等具結廠商履行具結情形，爰該具結措施已造成龐大之行政負擔。本文檢視台灣價格具結實體程序及實務做法後，發現部分做法似不符合反傾銷協定或國際慣例。

    歐盟於1981年至2001年時期，經常使用具結措施，但自2006年以來，使用具結措施之頻率急劇下降。美國較常採自願出口限制（數量限制），而較少使用價格具結措施。本文藉由相關文獻說明實施價格具結之經濟福利效果，並探討歐盟與美國有關價格具結相關法律與實務做法、歐盟近年來較少採價格具結之原因及歐盟接受或拒絕價格具結措施之理由等，該等研究分析將提供予台灣反傾銷調查之主管機關參考。
    Currently, there are 3 anti-dumping cases settled by using price undertakings including the subject products of towel, certain footwear and cold-rolled stainless steel originating in China or Korea. Among which, Taiwan’s investigating authorities even accepted price undertakings offered by 82 Chinese exporters of certain footwear. Such measure has already caused the considerable administrative burden in monitoring
    respect. After examining the practices of Taiwan`s price undertaking cases, some procedural and substantive aspects seem inconsistent with Anti-Dumping Agreement or international customary practices.

    Price undertakings were frequently used by the EU during the period from 1981 to 2001, but the frequency has declined sharply since 2006. The U.S. has taken many
    voluntary export restrictions, but rarely used price undertakings to settle anti-dumping cases. This paper will explore the law and practice of the EU and the U.S. regarding price undertakings. It will also illustrate the reasons for decreasing use of price undertakings, and the grounds for accepting or rejecting price undertakings in the EU anti-dumping proceedings. In addition, this paper will use the relevant literature to elaborate the economic welfare of price undertakings. Finally, it will offer suggestion as the reference for Taiwan`s　investigating authorities.
    參考文獻: References
    1. About the European Commission. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/about/index_en.htm
    2. An introduction to anti-dumping and other EU trade law measures. Retrieved from:
    http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/26849/an-introduction-to-anti-dump
    ing-and-other-eu-trade-law-measures
    3. Armin Steinbach (2014). Price Undertakings in EU Anti-dumping Proceedings – an Instrument
    of the Past? Journal of Economic Integration, Vol.29 No.1, 165~187. Retrieved from
    http://dx.doi.org/10.11130/jei.2014.29.1.165
    4. Bernard Hoekman(1998). Free Trade and Deep Integration: Antidumping and Antitrust in
    Regional Agreements
    5. Bibek Debroy，Debashis Chakraborty (2007): Anti-dumping: Global Abuse of a Trade Policy
    Instrument.
    6. Belderbos, Vandenbussche & Veugelers (2002). Antidumping duties, undertakings, and foreign
    direct investment in the EU. Page 1-44
    7. Christoph Herrmann, Bruno Simma, Rudolf Streinz (2015). Trade Policy between
    Law, Diplomacy and Scholarship. Page 389.391
    8. Edmond McGovern (2015). EU Anti-Dumping and Trade Defense Law and Practice. Page 112
    9. Estela Montado (2006). The determinants of Price Undertakings in the EU, London School of
    Economics. Page 1-35
    10. Edwin Vermulst (1999). Competition and Anti-dumping: Continued Peaceful Co-existence?
    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=200616
    11. Frank Montag (2015). European Yearbook of International Economic Law-Price Undertakings in
    Anti-dumping Law: Recent Trends and Considerations from a Competition Law Perspective.
    Page 377-393
    108
    12. Francesco Perone (1995). Settlement of Anti-Dumping Cases by Price Undertaking: The
    European Community and United States Practice. Institute of Comparative Law McGiIl
    University, Montreal
    13. Greg Mastel (1998). Antidumping Laws and the U.S. Economy. Page 13-14.
    14. Ishikawa, J., & Miyagiwa, K. (2007). Price undertakings, VERs, and foreign direct investment:
    The case of foreign rivalry. Page 1-28
    15. Judith Czako, Johann Human and Jorge Miranda (2003). A Handbook on Anti-Dumping
    Investigations
    16. Moore, Michael O. (2005), VERs and Price Undertakings under the WTO. Page1-32
    17. Meredith Crowle (2003). An introduction to the WTO and GATT. Page 52
    18. Official Journal of the European Union.
    Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/oj/direct-access.html
    19. Prusa, Thomas (1992), “Why are so Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn?” Journal of
    International Economics, 33, pp. 1-20.
    20. Shih-Jye Wu, Yang-Ming Chang, Hung-Yi Chen (2013). Antidumping duties and price
    undertakings: A welfare analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance. Retrieved
    from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2013.05.013
    21. The commissioners (2014-2019). Retrieved from:
    https://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014-2019_en
    22. The European Commission website. Retrieved from:
    http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/accessing-markets/trade-defence/actions-against-imports-into-the
    -eu/anti-dumping/index_en.htm
    23. Tharakan, P. K. M. (1991). The political economy of anti-dumping undertakings in the European
    Communities. European Economic Review 35. 1341-1459.
    24. Tavares de Araujo, José (2001), Legal and economic interfaces between antidumping and
    competition policy, Division of International Trade and Integration, United
    Nations, Santiago, Chile, December.
    25. The official website of the European Parliament. Retrieved http://www.europarl.europa.eu/
    109
    26. Trade Defense Statistics of European Union. Retrieved from
    http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_results.cfm?key=anti-dumping%20statistics
    27. United States Department of Commerce.
    Retrieved from: http://enforcement.trade.gov/agreements/index.html
    28. U.S. Antidumping Manual Chapter 17: Terminations and Suspensions of Investigations
    29. U.S. Antidumping Manual Chapter 25: Five-Year (“Sunset”) Review
    30. Veugelers, R. and Hylke Vandenbussche (1999), European Antidumping Policy and the
    Profitability of National and International Collusion, European Economic Review, 43, 1-28.
    31. Vandenbussche (1995). World Competition. Law and Economic Review, 55-74.
    32. Van Bael and Bellis (2011), EC Anti-Dumping an Other Trade Defense Instruments, 5th
    edn., Alphen aan den.
    33. Vandenbuscche, H., & Wauthy, X. (2001). Inflicting injury through product quality: How
    European antidumping policy disadvantages European producers. European Journal of Political
    Economy, 17, 101–116.
    34. Wilfried Pauwels and Linda Springael (2002). The Welfare Effects of a European Anti-Dumping
    Duty and Price-Undertaking Policy. Atlantic Economic Journal , Vol. 30, issue 2, Pages 121-135
    35. WTO Technical Information on anti-dumping.
    Retrieved from: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/adp_e/adp_info_e.htm
    36. Yan Luo (2010). Anti-Dumping in the WTO, the EU and China: The rise of legalization in the
    trade regime and its consequences. Rijn, Kluwer Law International. Page 131.
    37. Zanardi, Maurizio (2004), Anti-Dumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha? The World
    Economy, Wiley Blackwell, Vol.27 No.3, Pages 425.
    38. 19 CFR 351.208 - Suspension of investigation
    39. 19 CFR 351.209- Violation of Suspension Agreement.
    40. 19 CFR 351.218- Sunset Reviews under Section 751(c) of the Act
    41. 中華經濟研究院(台灣WTO 中心)(2007):研析各國如何確保反傾銷措施之有效執行
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
    100926014
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100926014
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    601401.pdf3139KbAdobe PDF2112檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋