English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51692156      Online Users : 548
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96901


    Title: 試論《續漢書‧五行志》撰作及其體例因革之問題
    Other Titles: A Study on the “Wuxing Zhi” of Xu Hanshu
    Authors: 黃啟書
    Huang, Chi-Shu
    Keywords: 漢書;續漢書;五行;災異;應劭
    Hanshu;Xu hanshu;wuxing (five elements);zaiyi (anomalies);Ying Shao
    Date: 2011-06
    Issue Date: 2016-05-23 15:48:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 班固《漢書》首創〈五行志〉既總結西漢災異學，更為史傳開一新例。此志雖屢為學者訾議，但歷代史書多衍其流。其中以司馬彪《續漢書‧五行志》最要。蓋其為東漢災異之主要材料，又時代較早，體例或較能保留。本文將聚焦於司馬彪〈續志〉之形成背景，考辨其作者，並分析〈漢志〉、〈續志〉間體例之變革損益。主要意見如下：\\r〈續志〉於撰者雖只提及應劭、董巴、譙周三人，實應多承蔡邕之說。其中應劭長於禮制、風俗掌故，董巴、譙周專門天文、曆議。以劉昭注及《風俗通》佚文考之，應劭對於社會風俗異常現象如服妖、詩妖等之關心，更甚於天地災異。由〈續志〉與應劭《風俗通》文字之舛異，推度司馬彪應是取譙周作為〈續志〉之底本，而以應劭參校。〈漢志〉、〈續志〉之差異，在編纂體例分合上：〈續志〉雖亦取五行為法，卻將〈漢志〉中分開陳述之五行、五事，相混編纂。又將星孛、隕石之類改隸〈天文志〉。此雖肇因於〈漢志〉創制以來既存問題，但〈續志〉之更動，除已破壞洪範五行學說之基本架構，更影響後世如正史〈五行志〉之體例。在文獻徵集詳略上：〈續志〉未如〈漢志〉清晰標明其取材出處，又引述奏疏惟蔡邕、李固二人，至於郎顗、張衡、襄楷等災異大家，具不明引其名。其雖亦注意《漢記》災異記錄似有缺漏，但亦未積極加以補罅。
    The “Wuxing Zhi” of Xu Hanshu is the most important document about the anomaly (zaiyi) theories of eastern Han dynasty after the “Wuxing Zhi” of Hanshu. This article focuses on the editers of the “Wuxing Zhi” of Xu Hanshu and compares their edition style between the two “Wuxing Zhi”. Sima Biao (the author of the Xu Hanshu) said the main editors of the “Wuxing Zhi” were only Ying Shao, Dong Ba, Qiao Zhou. But he also accepted the Cai Yong’s ideas. Ying Shao’s article was written early, but it was not the most important opinions in the “Wuxing Zhi”. There are two differences between the two “Wuxing Zhi”. First, Xu Hanshu also used the wuxing style but mixed the wuxing and the wushi. It also changed the category about comets and meteorites. Second, Xu Hanshu did not quote the document source clearly like Hanshu and did not supplement the lost record about anomalies (zaiyi).
    Relation: 政大中文學報, 15, 197-230
    Bulletin of the Department of Chinese Literature National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大中文學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    15(197-230).pdf2754KbAdobe PDF2639View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback