政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96812
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114900/145937 (79%)
造訪人次 : 53994756      線上人數 : 631
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96812


    題名: 什麼樣的民主？什麼樣的新聞自由？ ——從民主理論視野分析美國新聞自由法制
    作者: 許家馨
    Hsu, Jimmy Chia-shin
    關鍵詞: 新聞自由;民主理論;菁英民主;共和民主;多元民主;新聞專業;言論自由;記者特權;聯邦通訊傳播委員會;回覆權
    Freedom of the Press;Theory of Democracy;Democratic Elitism;Republicanism;Liberal Pluralism;Journalistic Professionalism;Reporter’s Privilege;Federal Communications Commission;Right of Reply
    日期: 2011-12
    上傳時間: 2016-05-20 16:49:07 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文以三種民主理論：菁英民主論、多元民主論、共和民主論作為分析框架，用以分析美國新聞自由法制的發展，並嘗試賦予結構性的解釋，輔以歷史的解釋。本文主張：壹、第四權理論固然重要，只能用來理解一部分的美國新聞自由法制。必須引入其他民主理論的視野，才能完整地掌握全貌，開啟深入的比較法研究視野，以利創造性地比較參考外國法制。貳、美國聯邦最高法院的判決，不論個別的法官是否意識到，但其整體面貌，有高度策略性的理由可以解釋。參、沒有一種民主理論可以完整地說明美國新聞自由法制發展的思考框架或發展理路。不同的民主理論可以用來說明法制的不同部門。而不同的法制部門，對應著不同的新聞媒體發展階段，新聞專業程度、政黨體系、媒體市場結構等等。政府管制鬆弛的地方，乃是由其他的社會部門（市場、專業、文化）進行管制或調控。瞭解這些機制的互動，乃是創造性地參考他國法制的基礎。
    This article uses three theories of democracy—democratic elitism, liberal pluralism, and republicanism—as analytic frames to analyze the main features of the U.S. constitutional regime of freedom of the press, which includes strict judicial review against censorship, differential treatment of print and electronic media, and rejection of reporter privilege. This article argues the following. First, despite the prominence of the fourth estate theory of the press, it can only explain part of the American free press regime. Other theories of the press are needed to make sense of the overall features of the regime. Second, the differential treatment of print and electronic media can be explained with highly strategic reasons. Simplistic right rhetoric does not control in this field.Third, different theories of democracy can be used to explain different parts of the free press regime. They can also be used to understand the division of labor between the legal regime and other social mechanisms, which complement one another in regulating the press behaviors. This broadened perspective is necessary for an in-depth undertaking of comparative law, which compares not only the legal doctrines but their social foundations.
    關聯: 法學評論, 124, 1-71
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    124(001-071).pdf1242KbAdobe PDF22029檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋