English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51736083      Online Users : 631
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96792


    Title: 法官的異議與民主可問責性
    Other Titles: Judges’ Dissents and Democratic Accountability
    Authors: 王金壽;魏宏儒
    Wang, Chin-Shou;Wei, Hung-Ru
    Keywords: 不同意見書;民主可問責性;評議過程;司法獨立;司法權威
    Dissenting Opinion;Democratic Accountability;Deliberating Processes;Judicial Independence;Judicial Authority
    Date: 2011-02
    Issue Date: 2016-05-20 16:06:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 二○○七年，高雄市長選舉案的判決書所附註的不同意見書，引起社會大眾對於公開不同意見書的討論。本文將探討不同意見書應該公開的理由，特別是普通法院應公開不同意見書，以達到民主對司法的可問責性，並且說明不同意見書制度能成為民主監督司法重要的一環。當法官對判決有異議時，可提出不同意見書說明自己的意見；而民眾則可透過不同意見書與判決書的比照，更能知悉法官判決過程是否公允，讓人民看見法官的真實想法。本研究以民主可問責性的立場，說明不同意見書的公開，並不損及民主制度下的司法權威，及對評議秘密原則的再闡釋，並不危及司法獨立，相反地，是有所助益。除此之外，本文亦將討論法官之間的權力關係。最後說明法官良知問題以及討論公開不同意見書之權利與義務。總言之，不同意見書的公開，其效益當大於成本，人民將有機會監督法官判決過程是否公允，法官是否秉持公義來審判，以達到民主監督的效果。
    This paper will discuss why judges’ dissents should be made open to the public since their dissents are very important to the judicial democratic accountability. When judges express dissent at a trial, they should have the right to proclaim such dissent publicly. By comparing and contrasting judges’ dissents, the public will be able to examine whether the judges’ decisions are fair and just. In this sense, judges’ dissents do not deteriorate the authority of the judiciary, and they do not violate the principle of secret of deliberation and that of judicial independence. Instead, judges’ dissents may help maintain judicial independence. Moreover, this paper will also discuss how power relations among judges affect the deliberating process since judges’ dissents may help balance unequal powers among judges. In order to increase judicial accountability, judges should have the right and obligation to proclaim their dissents publicly.
    Relation: 法學評論, 119, 1-62
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    119(1-62).pdf1145KbAdobe PDF2984View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback