政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96742
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114014/145046 (79%)
Visitors : 52053828      Online Users : 638
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96742


    Title: 胚胎及胚胎幹細胞研究之法律規範─瑞士幹細胞研究法對我國之啟示
    Other Titles: The Regulation of Embryo and Embryonic Stem Cell Research- Swiss Stem Cell Research Art to the Apocalypse of Taiwan
    Authors: 陳志忠
    Chen, Chih-Chung
    Keywords: 胚胎研究;胚胎幹細胞研究;胚胎幹細胞;胚胎生殖細胞;瑞士幹細胞研究法
    Date: 2008-08
    Issue Date: 2016-05-20 11:17:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 鑑於胚胎及胚胎幹細胞研究立法之必要性，本文以瑞士二○○五年幹細胞研究法為比較法研究對象，用以與我國曾進入立法院審議程序之「人類胚胎及胚胎幹細胞保護研究法草案」、「人類胚胎及胚胎幹細胞研究保護法草案」以及衛生署於九十六年八月九日公告之「人類胚胎及胚胎幹細胞研究倫理政策指引」進行比較研究。論述過程除先就我國及各國目前在此領域之規範情形略加敘述，以及就瑞士幹細胞研究法之立法過程及內容加以介紹外。討論重心則在將兩份草案以及倫理政策指引中，有關胚胎及胚胎幹細胞研究之基本原則以及限制要件加以釐清；並與瑞士幹細胞研究法進行比較研究。最後則提出若干立法建議以為結論。
    In view of the need for legislation on human embryo and embryonic stem cell research, this author has conducted a careful study, comparing two relevant draft bills being deliberated at the Legislative Yuan and the Ethical Guidelines for ESC Research proclaimed by the Department of Health on Aug. 9, 2007 with the Swiss Stem Cell Research Act, which became effective March 1, 2005.
    This comparative study, first, gives a general description of the current state of the ESC regulations in various countries, including Taiwan. Then it provides an introduction to the contents of the Stem Cell Act in Switzerland as well as its experience in enacting the legislation.
    The discussion focused on the restrictions the two bills and the Ethical Guidelines impose on ESC research, for the purpose of detailing the circumstances under which such research needs to be restricted. A comparative study of these proposed restrictions and those of Switzerland were also made. Finally, a number of proposals were raised by this author for consideration by lawmakers.
    Relation: 法學評論, 104, 61-128
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Chengchi law review ] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    104(061-128).pdf841KbAdobe PDF2382View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback