政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96741
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51740246      在线人数 : 619
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96741


    题名: 誠信原則的理論與實踐
    其它题名: The Principles of European Contract Law and Good Faith
    作者: 陳聰富
    Chen, Tsung-Fu
    关键词: 誠信原則;公平交易;歐洲契約法原則;歐陸法;英美法;締約上過失;情事變更原則;不當終止契約
    日期: 2008-08
    上传时间: 2016-05-20 11:16:52 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 歐陸法國家普遍承認誠信原則作為民法的基本原則，但英國法則採取完全相反的立場，認為誠信原則過於抽象化，並無明確之判斷標準，影響法律的明確性與安定性。然而，同屬英美法系的美國法，則仿效德國法而採取誠信原則作為判決之理由。本文介紹歐洲契約法原則關於誠信原則之規定；說明歐陸法關於誠信原則之解釋適用及其採取誠信原則之理由；探討英國法反對誠信原則之立場，以及正反理由的爭辯，並考察同為不成文法國家的美國，對於誠信原則的看法。本文並檢討誠信原則的意義與適用標準，最後則討論我國法關於誠信原則的適用案例。\\r
    Good faith is generally recognized by continental law countries as a fundamental principle in the civil code, while English law does not recognize good faith in contract law due to its abstract nature and its lack of clarity and certainty. Nonetheless, in American law, one of the Anglo-American laws follows German law in adopting the principle of good faith. This paper introduces the provisions regarding good faith in the Principles of European Contract Law, and the application of good faith in European countries. In so doing, this paper explores the debate over good faith in English law, and examines the reasons why American law applies the principle of good faith to its contract law. Based on the discussion of good faith in various countries, this paper further re-examines the meanings and the application criteria of good faith in the theory on which Taiwanese contract law is put to the table for discussion.
    According to this research, good faith has exercised a great impact on continental law countries. It has been argued in certain cases in continental law countries with the claim that good faith is too obscure and uncertain, and may serve as a tool for an arbitrary court decision, although this was argued by the English lawyers. The reasons why the English and Continental law systems adopt different standings on good faith are based on their different legal systems, legal cultures, and legal consciousness in their respective countries. Without the principle of good faith, judges tend to be more hesitant in creating legal obligations and restraining the exercise of rights, which may render the court unable to enforce justice. The major contribution made by good faith to continental law is that judges, based on their concepts of fairness and justice, are capable of intervening in private law relationships between contending parties as needed.
    關聯: 法學評論, 104, 1-60
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    104(001-060).pdf802KbAdobe PDF2406检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈