 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51762920
Online Users : 490
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96738
|
| Title: | 析論教育部「大學評鑑法」之適法性與合憲性 |
| Other Titles: | An Analysis on the Legality and Constitutionality of MOE`s University Evaluation Rules |
| Authors: | 陳文政
Chen, Wen-Cheng |
| Keywords: | 大學自治;大學監督;大學評鑑;大學法;大學評鑑辦法;合法性;合憲性 |
| Date: | 2008-06 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-05-20 11:16:18 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 我國憲法係以制度保障大學自治，同時也授權國家依法監督大學。《大學法》有關大學評鑑之規範符合憲法之要求，即一方面賦予各大學自訂規則實施自我評鑑，一方面授權教育部訂定辦法進行「以大學為對象，以校務行政為內容」之大學評鑑。
The provisions of ROC’s constitution protect the autonomy of univsersities by means of institutional guarantees, and grant the government the right to supervise universities according to the enacted law. Under the framework of the constitution, the University Act authorizes every university to formulate rules for regular self-evaluation, while investing the Ministry of Education with the power to institute regulations governing the evaluation of universities. However, the object of university evaluation shall be the whole university, and its contents shall be limited to the administrative affairs of a given university.
The University Evaluation Rules, promulgated by the Ministry of Education, however, exceed their power to enlarge the object of evaluation to the university’s departments and institutes, and extend the items of evaluation to the curriculum and teaching affairs, which pertain to the core contents of the autonomy of universities; hence they violate the University Act and the Constitution. But it will be constitutional if the Ministry of Education restricts its regular evaluations to university administrative affairs.
In addition, in the evaluation process, both the Ministry of Education and the Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan acted against the due process of the law, and the evaluation reports they made infringe upon university autonomy by requesting the evaluated departments and institutes to adjust their curriculum and teaching programs. Accordingly, it goes without saying that the actions they took are unconstitutional. |
| Relation: | 法學評論, 103, 1-61 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 103(001-061).pdf | | 864Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 439 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
