政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96737
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51745597      在线人数 : 605
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96737


    题名: 經濟管制的平等思維─兼評大法官有關職業暨營業自由之憲法解釋
    其它题名: Equal Protection in Economic Regulation—An Analysis of the Interpretations of the Grand Justices Related to the Freedom of Occupation and Enterprise
    作者: 李建良
    Lee, Chien-Liang
    关键词: 經濟管制;職業自由;工作權;營業自由;平等權;平等原則;比例原則
    日期: 2008-04
    上传时间: 2016-05-20 10:51:35 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 「經濟管制」一詞在學理上具有多義性，不同學科領域各有其關懷取向與論究重點。從公法的角度出發，經濟管制大體不出國家對人民經濟活動的形成、規制、調整及干預，藉以達到特定的經濟目標，諸如維持競爭性的市場機制、管制監控產業的活動、建立良善的勞資關係及維繫健全的經濟秩序。「經濟管制」對於人民（個人或團體）權利的影響，既深且鉅，憲法保障之工作權、職業自由、營業自由、財產權，甚至是言論自由，皆因經濟管制而受到或多或少、或強或弱的限制。國家經濟管制措施的合憲性，無疑是憲法解釋與適用的重要課題之一。司法院大法官歷來解釋對人民工作權的保障，雖然著有貢獻，但多半集中在法律保留原則、比例原則或信賴保護原則的檢驗，至於平等原則的審查，似較不足，故本文嘗試構建憲法保障平等權的思維方法，再據以整理、檢視大法官有關職業暨營業自由的憲法解釋，期能引發大法官對經濟管制之平等審查的重視，並供學術討論與實務運作的參考。
    “Equal Regulation” has multiple meanings in the academic field. Each subject has its own concerns and focuses for research. From the perspective of the public law, economic regulation contains formulation, regulation, adjustment, and intervention imposed on people’s economic activities in order to achieve specific economic goals such as the implementation of a competitive market, the control over industries, the establishment of a harmonious relationship between labor and capital, and the maintenance of a sound economic order. Economic regulation has a great impact on people’s rights, individually or collectively, including the right to work, the freedom of occupation, the freedom of enterprise, the freedom of business, the property right, and the freedom of speech. Therefore, the constitutionality of the government’s economic regulation is undoubtedly a critical topic in the interpretation and application of the Constitution. Although the preceding judicial interpretations support the protection of the right to work, they focus limitedly on the principle of legal reservation, the principle of proportionality, and the principle of reliance protection, and are insufficient in the discussion on the principle of equal protection. Expecting that the Grand Justice will place more emphasis on equal protection when reviewing the economic regulations and providing a reference for the academic and practice fields, this article aims to construct the thoughts and methods on equal protection, and comments on the judicial interpretations related to the freedom of occupation and the freedom of business.
    關聯: 法學評論, 102, 71-157
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    102(071-157).pdf903KbAdobe PDF21449检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈