English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 52551821      Online Users : 824
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96678


    Title: 「功能最適」原則下司法違憲審查權與立法權的區分——德國功能法論述取向(funktionell-rechtlicher Ansatz)之問題與解套
    Other Titles: The Separation of Powers Between the Constitutional Court and Legislature according to the German Funktionell-Rechtlicher Ansatz
    Authors: 黃舒芃
    Hwang, Shu-Perng
    Keywords: 功能法論述取向;功能最適;審查密度;法適用;法制訂;司法違憲審查;立法;權力分立;實體法論述取向;客觀法標準
    funktionell-rechtlicher Ansatz;funktionsgerecht;Kontrolldichte(n);Rechtsanwendung(law application);Rechtsetzung (law making);constitutional review;legislation;separation of powers;materiell-rechtlicher Ansatz;objektiv-rechtliche Maßstäbe
    Date: 2006-06
    Issue Date: 2016-05-16 16:40:37 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近十餘年來在德國憲法學界頗為流行、並且在理論與實務層面也受到相當程度重視的所謂「功能法」論述取向，可說是德國法上為了釐清當代權限分際難題之背景下的重要產物。論者基於「換個著眼點」或者「換個角度」來思考權限分際問題的立場，提出「依照各事務領域的屬性進行權限分配」之所謂「功能最適」的主張，就憲法法院與立法者間權力分立的問題而言，希望藉此更清楚界定司法違憲審查權與立法權各自的管轄範圍。相較於單純的「司法自制」訴求，「功能法」論述取向顯然具有更明確積極的主張，因而取得更重要的理論地位；尤有甚者，透過聯邦憲法法院七○年代以來對審查密度的闡述與發展，「功能法」取向的意義更拓展到實務層面，進而發揮更大的影響力（詳後述）。不過儘管如此，「功能法」論述取向、或者作為其論述核心之「功能最適」訴求、或甚至釋憲實務上「審查密度」的發展，就聯邦憲法法院與立法者間權力分立問題的本質看來，到底是否、或在多大程度上，具備較諸「法適用」與「法制訂」的區分更進一步釐清司法違憲審查與立法權限分際的能力，其實仍有探討空間。有鑑於此，本文希望能透過對功能法論述取向、及其在實務上之表現較完整的理解與分析，嘗試檢討這個看似可望突破「法適用」與「法制訂」這項傳統區分、提供權力分立更新一層視野的思考與操作模式，指出其企圖、根本問題以及主要困境之所在，並藉此重新澄清司法違憲審查權與立法權間權力分立問題的本質，與由此而來基本的解決方向。
    The so-called"funktionell-rechtlicher Ansatz"(functional model) serves in German constitutional law as an important reaction to the contemporary problems of and debates over the separation of powers between constitutional review and legislation. According to this model, the separation of powers between the Constitutional Court and legislature should and can only be clarified on the basis that the separation of powers suggests a functional allocation of powers and that this functional allocation sets the boundary of the constitutional review according to its functional limits. This article tries to analyze this model against its theoretical and practical backgrounds and examine its problems from the perspective of the German separation of"Rechtsanwendung"(law application) and"Rechtsetzung"(law making) in the civil law tradition.
    Relation: 法學評論, 91, 99-144
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    91(99-144).pdf693KbAdobe PDF22238View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback