English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51719434      Online Users : 614
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96183


    Title: 績效衡量與指標設計:方法論上的討論
    Other Titles: Performance Measurement and Indicator Design: A Methodological Note
    Authors: 莊文忠
    Juang, Wen-Jong
    Keywords: 績效管理;績效衡量;績效指標;指標設計;公共管理
    performance management;performance measurement;performance indicators;performance indicators;public management
    Date: 2008-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 16:57:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著公共管理思潮的流行,績效管理運動亦大行其道,無論是公部門、私部門、抑或是第三部門,目前均籠罩在追求績效的氛圍之中。究竟這一切努力只是化為一種煙霧和口號,或是具有實質的策略意涵(尤其是以提供公共服務為目的公部門),實有待吾人投入更多的注意力,從方法論的觀點,更深入的剖析績效衡量與績效指標設計的相關課題,檢視績效管理的概念化和操作化過程中影響績效資訊有效性的潛在因素,並思考可能的解決方法。本研究由研究方法的角度切入,著重在績效管理相關概念與衡量操作的討論,並以實例作為輔助說明。在文章的結構鋪陳方面,本文首先檢析績效衡量的發展趨勢,以掌握整體的演變脈絡;其次,本文從指標概念的操作化過程,析論績效指標的不同類型與意涵;最後,本文利用衡量誤差和非衡量誤差的觀念,分別探討指標設計與績效衡量過程中可能影響績效資訊品質的因素,並提出若干相對應的解決策略。
    With public management well under way, performance management becomes fashionable in various organizations, public sector in particular. Yet, is it merely a popular slogan or an emerging trend merit noting? To decide the answer, this paper suggests it is a worthwhile work to examine the factors which are in the way of conceptualization and operationalization of performance management, and try to figure out plausible solutions. To be more specific, the author, first of all, gives a critical overview of related issues highlighted in the literatures concerning performance measurement to frame discussions. Major themes are illuminated, as well, by way of referring a number of instances. The paper then turns to categorize and elaborate performance indicators available through conceptualization process. In addition, the author differentiates measurement error from non-measurement error for the purpose of identifying key factors contributing to a quality indicator design and performance measurement. In the concluding section, the author offers some observations and strategies for an effective performance management.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 29,61-91
    Journal of Public Administration National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學報 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    29(p.61-91).pdf847KbAdobe PDF27831View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback