English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51722164      Online Users : 584
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96069


    Title: 基層員警取締性交易的執行研究：批判性詮釋途徑之應用
    Other Titles: An Implementation Research on How the Street-Level Police Curb Prostitution: The Use of a Critical Interpretative Approach
    Authors: 彭渰雯
    Peng, Yen-Wen
    Keywords: 政策執行;框架衝突;基層員警;性交易;詮釋;基進民主
    implementation;frame conflict;street-level police;prostitution;interpretation;radical democracy
    Date: 2008-09
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 16:24:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以基層員警取締性交易的執行過程和結果為例，探討「政策執行」對性交易這樣的爭議型政策的意涵。既有的許多執行研究早已指出，一個沒有社會共識的政策很難「有效執行」，然而絕大多數的政策是不可能等待「社會共識」的。那麼，這些在決策階段沒有被「化解」的政策爭議，到了執行階段，會被執行者如何詮釋？對執行過程造成什麼影響？「執行無效」或「執行不力」的意義是什麼？對於政策標的團體又有什麼影響？此為本文主要發問。透過對於基層員警執法經驗的批判性詮釋分析，本文指出在決策階段表面遭到排除的政策主張—性交易應當合法化—並未停止其作用，而成為基層員警辯護其「消極執法」正當性的理據。這樣的消極執行則有著「衝突緩衝」的作用，它使得這個議題原本內含的框架衝突，不再發展成為另一波推動修法的政治對抗。然而衝突的緩衝有其代價：弱勢階級的賣淫者，在消極執法的過程中，成為禁娼政策「象徵性取締」的主要對象。基進民主論者早已指出，沒有任何政策決定能夠完全免於排除，重點在於區辨哪些排除與壓迫是可以辯護的，而哪些不行，此一洞見對於我們面對爭議型政策時至為重要。本文揭露並解釋禁娼政策如何在執行上造成了階級歧視的非預期後果，此一分析應足以構成檢討性交易政策的實務基礎。藉此，本文強調爭議型政策的目標界定，特別需要藉由執行實務經驗的回饋，不斷地進行反省檢討，以降低不可辯護之負面效應。就此本文也顯示了批判詮釋型的政策執行研究對民主治理可以有的貢獻。
    This paper explores the role and implications of implementation in controversial policies through a case study on the street-level police’s clampdown of prostitution. Since policy conflicts are always blamed for causing implementation failure, I am interested to know how exactly the “unsolved” policy conflicts might affect implementation and the implementers; what are the implications of “implementation failure” or “ineffective implementation”; and how the target population might be impacted. After performing a critical interpretative analysis on the police’s experiences, I argue that the excluded policy frame(s) at the policy formulation stage did not disappear, but were represented in the police’s “passive implementation.” Meanwhile, passive implementation as such serves as a buffer for the unsolved frame conflicts, preventing them from evolving into another wave of political or social confrontation. Yet the buffer costs: the burden of unsolved conflicts was shifted to lower-rank prostitutes, who appeared to be the main target of the police’s passive implementation. This paper aims to show how implementation research can contribute to not only the uncovering of excluded or ignored frames at the formulation stage, but also the practical impacts of such exclusion. Acknowledging that exclusion is inevitable for any policy, I argue that the point of policy analysis is to distinguish justifiable exclusion from unjustifiable one. In this sense, implementation research plays an important role for realizing democratic governance.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 28,115-151
    Journal of Public Administration National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學報 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    28-4(p.115-151).pdf1149KbAdobe PDF2826View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback