政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/95866
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51797783      Online Users : 517
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95866


    Title: 新創公司創業成功因素之探討－公司內部與外部互動關係之觀點
    Authors: 許家榮
    Contributors: 林月雲
    許家榮
    Keywords: 創業領導者
    創業團隊
    股東與董事會
    產業環境
    創業成功因素
    新事業績效
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 15:47:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 　　創業研究是近年來頗受重視的研究課題，尤其台灣科技產業的創業行為造就了台灣的經濟奇蹟。回顧文獻上對於創業的研究早期多針對創業領導者的背景、創業動機、人格特質以及領導風格等，在90年代末期有關創業團隊的研究才逐漸的受到重視，隨後有關產業環境的影響因素也納入了創業研究的範疇。在本研究的研究過程中，發覺創始股東與董事會的組成與參與程度，亦是決定創業成功與否的關鍵之一。由於過去學者並未對創業領導者、創業團隊、股東與董事會以及產業環境等四個影響構面進行整合性的互動分析。因此，本研究遂以探討四個構面之互動關係對創業成功因素的影響為本研究之研究目的。
    　　本研究針對在台灣成立迄今六年內之生物科技與網路公司為訪談對象，採用深入訪談的方式，分別針對四家公司進行兩次的訪談。經過歸納整理之後，發展以下之相關命題與建議，以供後續研究參考：
    　　一、創業領導者方面之命題：
    　　命題1：網路產業之創業領導者的創業動機，不受學經歷背景的影響，而與過去的工作經驗有關。
    　　命題2：創業領導者擁有相對多數的股權，有利於對團隊運作的控制力。
    　　命題3：創業領導者具有積極樂觀、責任感、工作狂以及永不放棄的特質，有利於創業成功。
    　　　　3-1：創業領導者積極與工作狂的特質，有利於對市場機會的掌握。
    　　　　3-2：創業領導者積極、不放棄以及責任感的特質有利於吸引優秀的創業團隊成員與創業股東。
    　　　　3-3：創業領導者選擇與本身的人格特質相匹配的團隊成員，有利於團隊的互動與和諧。
    　　命題4：創業領導者以身作則，並且適當地授權的領導風格，有利於產生良好的團隊績效，以促成創業成功。
    　　命題5：創業領導者擁有描繪願景的能力，有助於凝聚團隊成員的共識。
    　　二、有關創業團隊方面的命題：
    　　命題6：高科技創業團隊組成與互動，會影響創業績效。
    　　　　6-1：創業團隊技術比例高有利於資金募集。
    　　　　6-2：創業團隊互動良好，有利於創業領導者策略的制訂與執行。
    　　　　6-3：以功能互補性與人格特質為創業團隊組成之考量，有利於產生良好的團隊績效。
    　　　　6-4：創業團隊良好的溝通，有助於團隊共識的形成，產生良好的團隊績效。
    　　命題7：新創公司高階管理團隊，若由創業團隊轉換成功能完整的經營團隊將有助於公司的成長。
    　　三、有關股東結構方面之命題：
    　　命題8：隨著公司的成長，新創公司董事成員由創業團隊成員轉變成專業之內外董事有利於創業績效。
    　　命題9：新創公司具有良好股東結構有利於創業成功。
    　　　　9-1：新創公司若擁有相關產業之領導公司擔任公司股東，有利於吸引優秀人才與新股東加入。
    　　　　9-2：新創公司若擁有相關產業之領導公司擔任公司股東，有利於公司事業網絡與政府關係之連結。
    　　　　9-3：新創公司股東對領導者充分授權與協助，有利於領導者策略定位的成功。
    　　四、有關產業環境部分之命題：
    　　命題10：產業環境越不明確，新創公司越需要仰賴創業領導者特質的發揮，以吸引創業團隊與創始股東。
    　　　　10-1：產業前景不明確，容易造成投資人投資意願降低。假若創業領導者愈能夠展現積極與不放棄的特質，將有助於資金的募集。
    　　　　10-2：產業環境越不明確，造成優秀人才加入意願降低。創業領導者若擁有積極、狂熱與負責的特質，將有助於吸引人才加入的意願。
    Reference: 一、中文部分：
    1. 司徒達賢，2001，「策略管理新論--觀念架構與分析方法」，智勝文化。
    2. 伍孟純，民90，「高科技產業廠商經營績效關鍵成功因素之研究」，私立長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    3. 朱沛，民91，「創業者的知識和關係對創業績效的影響」，國立政治大學全球化經營策略論壇第三次論文發表會論文集，pp.121-160。
    4. 江正信，民89，「高階經營團隊與企業策略決策模式,組織學習傾向,創新能力及經營」，國立成功大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    5. 吳昆皇，民84，「上市公司董事會組成與特性對企業經營績效之關聯性研究」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    6. 李田樹譯，民91，Peter F. Drucker，「管理的責任」，天下雜誌出版。
    7. 李儒宜，民87，「創業家之個人特徵、創業動機與人格特質對於創業行為影響之探討」，國立東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    8. 沈如騏，民88，「董事會與高階管理團隊特質對高科技公司研究發展投入之影響」，國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    9. 汪青河，民80，「創業家創業行為與環境、個人特徵關係之研究」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    10. 林士賢，民85，「高科技創業家個人特徵與其領導方式及決策風格之研究－以新竹科學園區為例」，私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    11. 林宜瑾譯，民81，Miller, Lawrence M.,，「領導者的7次微笑：從野蠻到官僚的循環」，時報。
    12. 邱奕嘉，民86，「經營特質、創新型態與領導風格對經營績效的影響－新竹科學園區企業之實證分析，國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    13. 徐澤汶，民88，「高階主管人員與資本主之互動關係對晉升發展之相關研究」，私立輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
    14. 張世鍵，民89，「高科技人員離職創業歷程相關因素研究」，私立中原大學碩士論文。
    15. 張金山，民80，「創業行為與成就動機、家族背景之相關性研究」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
    16. 張啟禎，民85，「高科技產業初期融資決策之研究」，國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    17. 張維仲，「新創科技公司資金募集及研發管理關鍵要素探討」，民90，國立政治大學經營管理碩士班碩士論文。
    18. 張馨芸，民90，「我國女性主管的領導風格與決策行為之研究─以民營企業個案為例」，國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
    19. 莊任暘，民89，「高科技創業成功因素研究」，國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    20. 郭洮村，民87，「工研院研發人員離職創業相關因素之研究」，私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    21. 陳金勇，民90，「台灣通訊產業創業關鍵成功因素研究－以A公司為例」，國立交通大學高階主管管理學程碩士班碩士論文。
    22. 陳昱亨，民90，「創業家與投資人關係之研究：程序公平理論之應用」，高雄第一科技大學金融營運研究所碩士論文。
    23. 陳景堯，1999, 8，「成功創業五大法則」，天下雜誌第219期。
    24. 陳維新，民80，「創業策略與創業績效──臺灣創業家之實證研究」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    25. 黃欽河，民90，「創業團隊領導者的技術能耐與新產品開發行為關係之研究─以龍園創新育成中心為例」，私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    26. 楊敏玲，民82，「青年女性創業家創業動機與創業類型之研究」，國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    27. 楊維鈞，民89，「技術創業型態與經營策略之實證研究與賽局分析」，國立交通大學科技管理學程碩士論文。
    28. 楊蕉霙，民79，「所有權結構與公司價值間關係之研究」，國立中山大學碩士企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    29. 趙亦珍，民90，「女性創業家性別角色與創業行為之研究」，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    30. 齊立文譯，2002，Katherine Catlin and Jana Matthews，「創業家到執行長」，商智文化。
    31. 劉常勇，民86，「創業投資評估決策程序」，會計研究月刊，134期。
    32. 劉橫智，民89，「華人研發創業者之創業生涯」，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    33. 歐建益，民90，「創業家特質、動機與創業問題之研究」，國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    34. 蔣永新，民90，「創業投資公司對生物技術公司之投資行為個案研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    35. 蔡幸娟，民86，「臺灣地區創業投資事業專業經理人之投資評估準則研究」，國立台灣大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    36. 蔡繡容，民90，「創業家之認知與行為意向之研究：計畫行為理論與社會認知理論之應用」，私立高雄第一科技大學金融營運系碩士班碩士論文。
    37. 鄭蕙萍，民88，「創業家的個人背景,心理特質,創業驅動力對創業行為的影響」，大同工學院事業經營研究所碩士論文。
    38. 戴佳雯，民89，「高科技產業網絡特色之探討」，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    39. 薛招治，民89，「高階管理團隊組成特性之演變-以台灣電子資訊產業為例」，雲林科技大學企業管理技術研究所碩士論文。
    40. 顏和正，2002，「50大集團合、分間快速成長的經濟巨人」，天下雜誌第253期。
    二、英文部分：
    1. Amason, A., 1996, “Distinguishing the effect of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal. 39(1), pp.123-148.
    2. Amason, A.C. and Schweiger, D.M., 1994, “Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making and organizational performance,” Journal of Conflict Management. 5, pp.239-253
    3. Ancona, D.S., and Caldwell, D.F., 1988, “Beyond task and maintenance.” Group and Organization Studies 13, pp.468-494.
    4. Ancona, D.S., and Caldwell, D.F., 1992, “Bridging the boundary: external activity and performance in organizational teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 4, pp.634-665.
    5. Ancona,D.S., and Nadler, D.A., 1989, “Top hats and executive tales: designing the senior team.” Sloan Management Review 1, pp.19-29.
    6. Bantel, K. A., 1994, “Strategic Planning Openness: The Role of Top Team Demography,” Group & Organization Management, Vol.19(4), pp.406-424.
    7. Bird, B.J., 1989, “Entrepreneurial Behavior.” Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Co.
    8. Bollinger, Lynn; Hope, Katherine; Utterback, James M, 1983, “A Review of Literature and Hypotheses on New Technology-Based Firms.” Research Policy, Amsterdam; 12(1), pp.1-14.
    9. C. Carl Pegels, Yong I. Song and Baik Yang, 1994, “Management Heterogeneity, Competitive Interaction Group, and Firm Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 21. pp.911-923
    10. Candida G. Brush and Pieter A. Vanderwerf,1992, “A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance.” Journal of Business Venturing 7. pp. 157-170
    11. Carless, Sally A.; de Paola, Caroline, 2000, “The Measurement of Cohesion in Workteams.” Small Group Research 31(1), pp. 71.
    12. Chandler, G. N., & Hanks S.H., 1998, “An investigation of new venture teams in emerging business.” IN: P. D. Reyonlds, W. D. Bygrave, N. M. Carter, S Manigart, C. M. Mason, G. D. Meyer, and K.G. Shaver(Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, pp.318-330. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
    13. Cooper A.C., and Daily, C.M., 1997, “Entrepreneurial Teams. In D. L. Sexton and R.W. Smilor (eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000. Chicago: Upstart, pp. 127-150
    14. Cooper, A. C., W. C. Dunkelberg, C. Y. Woo and W. J. Dennis, 1990,New Business in America: The Firms and their Owners, Washington, DC: National Foundation of Independent Business.
    15. Cooper, Arnold C. and Albert V. Bruno, 1977, “Success among High-Technology Firms,” Business Horizons 20(2). pp.16-22
    16. Daniel Levi, 2001, Group Dynamics for Teams, Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publications
    17. David L. Deeds, Dona DeCarolis and Joseph Coombs, 1997, “The impact of firm specific capabilities on the amount of capital raised in an initial public offerings: evidence from the biotechnology industry.” Journal of Business Venturing 12(1), pp.31-46
    18. Deborah H France and William R Sandberg, 2000, “Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with and venture performance,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25(2), pp.5-25
    19. Donald F Kuratko, Jeffrey S Hornsby and Dougle W Naffziger, 1997, “An examination of owner’s goals in sustaining entrepreneurship,” Journal of Small Business Management35(1), Milwaukee, Jan, pp.24-33
    20. Donald F Kuratko, R Duane Ireland and Jeffrey S Hornsby, 2001, “Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: A cordian’s corporate entrepreneurship strategy,” ; Birarcliff Manor; Nov
    21. Donald L Sexton, 1998, “Boards and the fast-growth entrepreneurial company.” Directorship, Westport; 24(5), pp. 6-9.
    22. Doutriaux J, 1992, “Emerging High-Tech Firms: How Durable Are Their Comparative Sart-up Advantages?”. Journal of Business Venturing 7. pp.303-322.
    23. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Schoonhoven, C.B., 1990, “Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, pp.504-529.
    24. Elron, E., 1997, “Top management teams within multinational corporations: effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadership Q .4(8), pp.393-413.
    25. Feldman, Daniel C., 1984, “The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms.” Academy Of Management. The Academy Of Management Review, Briarcliff Manor; Jan;9(1), pp. 47-53.
    26. Gnyawali, Devi R, 1994, “Environments for entrepreneurship development: Key dimension.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Waco; Summer 18(4), pp. 43-42.
    27. Goodman, Paul S., Elizabeth Ravlin and Marshall Schminke, 1987, “Understanding Groups in Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 9, pp.121-173.
    28. Hackman, J.R., 1990, “Groups That Work and Groups That Don’t.” San Frnacisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.1-35, 479-504.
    29. Hambrick DC,and Mason PA, 1984, “Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of ots top managers,” Academy of Management Review 9(2), pp.193-206.
    30. Hitt, M.A. 1994, “a mid-range theory of interfunctional integration, its antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management.
    31. Hoegl, Martin, 1998, Teamarbeit in innovativen Projekten- Einfluflgroβen und Wirkungen, Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
    32. Kamm J. B., Shuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A., & Nurick, A. J. 1990, “Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), pp7-17
    33. Kamm J.B. and Nurick, A.J, 1993, “The stage of team venture formation: a decision model.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 17(2). pp. 17-28
    34. Kamm, JB., And Shuman, J.C., Seeger, J.A. Nurick, A.J1989, “Are well-balance teams more successful? In R.H. Brockhaus et al.(eds.)” Frontiers of entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College, pp.428-429.
    35. Karen A Jehn; Elizabeth A Mannix,2001, “The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance,” Academy of Management Journal; Briarcliff Manor
    36. Katz, Ralph, 1982, “The effect of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance.” Administrative Science Quartely 27, pp.81-104.
    37. Keller, R. T., 1986, “Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 29(4), pp.715-726.
    38. Knight D, Pearce CL, Smith KG, Olean JD, Sims HP, Smith KA, Flood P, 1999, “Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus.” Srategic Management Journal 20(5), pp.445-465.
    39. Levine, John M. and Richard L. Moreland, 1990, “Progress in Small Group Research”, Annual Review of Psychology 41, pp.585-634.
    40. Low, M. B., and MacMillan, I. C.,1988, “Entrepreneurship: Past research and future chanllenges.” Journal of Management, 14(2), pp.139-161.
    41. Michael D. Ensley, Allison W. Pearson and Allen C. Amason, 2002, “Understanding the Dynamics of New Venture Top Management Teams Cohesion, Conflict, and New Venture Performance.” Journal of Business Venturing 17, pp. 365-386.
    42. Michel, John G. and D. C. Hambrick,1992, “Diversification Posture and TopManagement Team Characteristics,” Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), pp.9-38.
    43. Mohrmans, S., and Cohen, S., 1994, “When people get out of the box: new attachments to co-workers.” Publication G94-19, Center for Effective Organizations, University of Southern California.
    44. Molly Inhofe Rapert, Anne Velliquette and Judith A. Garretson, 2002, “The strategic implementation process Evoking strategic consensus through communication.” Journal of Business Research 55, pp. 301-310
    45. Moore, Robert M, 1997, “The positive effects of cohesion on the creativity of small groups ,” International Social Science Review 72(3/4), pp84-94.
    46. Mullen and Copper, 1994, “The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: a integration,” Psychol. Bull 115(2), pp.210-217
    47. Murray, Alan I., 1989, “Top Management Group Heterogeneity and FirmPerformance,” Strategic Management Journal, 10, pp. 125-142.
    48. Nobel CH. 1999 “The eclectic roots of strategy implementation research.” Journal of Business Research.45, pp.119-134
    49. O’Reilly, C. A. and S. Flatt, 1989, “Executive Team Demography, OrganizationalInnovation and Firm Performance,” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.
    50. Pelz, D.C. and Andrews, F.M. 1976, Scientists in Organizations. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
    51. Per Davidsson, Murrary B Low, Mike Wright, 2001, “Editor’s introduction: Low and MacMillan ten years on : Achievements and future directions for entrepreneurship research”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice; Waco; Summmer 25(4), pp. 5-16.
    52. Per Davidsson; Johan Wiklund, 2001, “Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice; Waco; Summer, 25(4), pp. 81-100.
    53. Pinto, Mary Beth and Jerry K. Pinto, 1990, “Project Team Communication and Cross-Functional Cooperation in New Program Development.” Journal of Product Innovation Mangement 7, pp.200-212.
    54. Pleschak, Franz and Henning Werner, 1998, Technologieorientierte Unternehmensundungen in denneuen Bundeslandern — Wissenschaftliche Analyse und Begleitung de BMBF- Modellversuchs, Physika Verlag, Heidelberg.
    55. Radha Chaganti and Joy A. Schneer, 1994, “A Study of The Impact of Owner’s Mode of Entry on Venture Performance and Management Patterns”. Journal of Business Venturing 9, pp. 243-260.
    56. Rodney C. Shrader and Mark Simon, 1997. “Corporate versus Independent new ventures: resource, strategy, and performance differences,” Journal of Business Venturing 12, pp. 47-66.
    57. Shaw, M.E., 1981, Group dynamics: the Psychology of Small Group Behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    58. Smith K. G and De Gregorio. D, 2000, “Bisociation, discovery and the role of entrepreneurial action. Creating a new mindset: Integrating strategy and entrepreneurship perspertive conference”, Kansas City, Mo: November.
    59. Smith, K. G., K. A.Smith, D. P. O’Bannon, J. D. Olian, H. P. Sims and J. Scully, 1994, “Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication,” Administrative Science Quarterly 39, pp.412-438.
    60. Staw, Barry M., Lance E. Sandelands and Jane E. Dutton, 1981, “Threat-Rigidity Effectsin Organization Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis,” Administrative ScienceQuarterly, 26, pp.501-524.
    61. Steiner, G.A., 1972, “Tomorrow’s corporate planning and planners.” Managerial plan. 20(5), pp.1-11
    62. Sue Birley and Simon Stockley, 2000, "Entrepreneurial Teams and Venture Growth" 1999 in D. Sexton and H. Landstrom [Eds] Handbook of Entrepreneurship Blackwell, Oxford pp.287-307, Co-author Simon Stockley, pp. 287-307.
    63. Thomas Lechler, 2001, “Social interaction: A Determinant of Entrepreneurial Team Venture Success,” Small Business Economics 16, pp. 263-278.
    64. Timmons J.A , 1999, New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for 21st Century, Irwin-McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA
    65. Timmons, J.A., 1990, New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship in the 1990s(3ed edition). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
    66. Tjosvold, Dean, 1995, “Cooperation Theory, Constructive Controversy, and Effectiveness: Learning from Crisis’, in Richard A. Guzzo and Salas Eduardo and Associates, Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.79-112.
    67. Van de Ven, A. H., Angle, H. L., and Poole, M .S. 1989, Research on the Mnaegement of Innovation. New York: Harper and Row.
    68. Van de Ven, A., 1993, “The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, 8, pp. 211-230.
    69. Vesper, K. H, 1990, New Venture Strategies, 2nd ed, Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice Hall.
    70. Vyalarnam, Shailendra, R. C. Jacobs and Jari Handelberg, 1997, “Formation and Development of Entrepreneurial Teams in Rapid Growth Businesses,” Working Paper.
    71. Waller MJ, Huber GP, Gluck WH, 1995, “Functional background as a determinant of executives selective perception.” Academy of Management Journal 38(4), pp.943-974.
    72. Warren E. Watson, Louis D. Ponthieu and Joseph W. Critelli, 1995, “Team Interpersonal Process Effectiveness in Venture Partnerships and its Connection to perceived Success,” Journal of Business Venturing 10(5), pp.393-411.
    73. West III, G. Page; Meyer, G. Dale, 1998,” To agree or not to agree? Consensus and performance in new ventures.” Journal of Business Venturing 13(5), pp. 395-422.
    74. Westhead, P, 1990, “A Typology of Manufacturing Firm Founders in Wales: Performance and Policy Implications.” Journal of Business Venturing. pp.103-122.
    75. Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V., 1985, “The measurement of cohesion in sports teams: The group environment questionnaire.” London, Ontario: Sports Dynamics.
    76. Zaccaro, S., & Lowe, C.,1988, “Cohesiveness and performance: Evidence for multidimensionality.” Journal of Social Psychology 128, pp. 547-558.
    77. Zaccaro, S., 1991, “Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality.” Journal of Social Psychology 131, pp. 387-399.
    78. Zenger, T. R. and B. S. Lawerence, 1989, “Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distribution on Technical Communication,” Academy ofManagement Journal, 32, pp.353-376.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    89355019
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000462
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Business Administation] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback