English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51836721      Online Users : 480
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/95787
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95787


    Title: 跨國企業子公司的角色演化及擴展-以奇異塑膠台灣子公司為例
    Multinational subsidiary evolution: The case of GE Plastics Taiwan
    Authors: 焦慧萍
    Chiao, Vicky
    Contributors: 譚丹琪
    Tan, Danchi
    焦慧萍
    Chiao, Vicky
    Keywords: 策略角色演化
    子公司的角色擴展
    區域整合
    子公司邊緣化
    產業價值鏈
    協同早期開發
    創業家精神
    產業外移
    Multinational subsidiary evolution
    Multinational subsidiary expansion
    Multinational subsidiary Strategic role
    Entrepreneurship
    Initiative taking
    Notebook value chain
    Notebook specification
    Collaborative design
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 17:13:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本個案分析以奇異塑膠台灣子公司為例,說明在面對各跨國公司區域整合紛紛將將區域總公司設在中國的趨勢,台灣產業外移,奇異塑膠台灣子公司如何避免被邊緣化的威脅? 說明台灣在2000年初、電子組裝產業由OEM 轉型為ODM,及雖然生產線外移但是產業仍將研發連同規格制定仍舊保留在台灣。而奇異塑膠台灣的子公司經理人如何發揮他的創業家精神,利用這些規格制定留台灣優勢的因素、還有他的敏銳的觀察力發現電子產業的國際與大中華區域之間的價值鏈,善用他與總公司與姊妹公司的良好關係兜售他的創意、取得母公司的支持資源、而培養奇異塑膠台灣子公司在電子組裝產業獨特的能力,進而對在中國的姊妹子公司做出貢獻。而這ㄧ連串的主導活動奇異塑膠台灣子公司不但沒有被邊緣化,反而子公司因此轉型,子公司經理人運用他的創意制定“台商規格制定的生意的平台“使子公司的地位在電子產業處於更重要的策略角色,組織不但未被縮編、還因此增加人員、且獲得總公司的認可,更將重要的電子產業的全球角色成員編列在台灣及ㄧ系列的獨特資源。 筆者也將此個案與歷年的文獻做比對,讓個案更有學理的基礎,可以有信心的用本文作為跨國公司在台灣的子公司做為發展的參考及勉勵,並且個案所述的價值鏈及台商規格制定的生意的平台是可以套用在任何國籍或跨區域需要規格制定的產業上。希望這個成功的模式可以幫助別人。
    This case study uses GE Plastic as an example to illustrate how a Taiwanese branch prevailed when facing the global trend that international corporations, including Taiwanese firms, restructured their district headquarters to mainland China. Taiwan GE Plastic general manager leveraged Taiwan’s unique advantages on product specifications to gain strategic importance and supports from its global and regional headquarter. This manager realized several facts: first, although Taiwan moved its manufacturing components to mainland China. Taiwan kept its designing capabilities in-house; second. Greater China needs Taiwan’s capabilities to complete the value chain and generate profits; third, she maintained favorable relationships with the global headquarter and China regional headquarter. In lights of these facts, she sold an innovative concept to the global headquarter and attained resources to create a platform that kept Taiwan GE plastic relevant. This “speciation-dictating” platform enabled Taiwan GE Plastic to dominate its industry and contribute enormously to its sibling, the China branch. Not only wasn’t it marginalized, Taiwan GE Plastic placed itself in a key strategic position and gained recognition from its mother headquarter. This platform is not bounded by a particular industry and can be used in many other domains. Practitioners from other industries in Taiwan may gain insightful implications from this case and reposition their Taiwan branches in a vantage point.
    Reference: 中文參考文獻

    1. 于卓民(2000),國際企業環境與管理二版,華泰文化出版社。
    2. 于卓民(2002),國際企業管理導向,智勝出版社。
    3. 李貴惠(2007),多國公司區域策略、區域組織及子公司角色改變-三者關係之研究, 國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    4. 朱淑暖 (2005)、多國公司部門控制機制之比較-以國際快遞公司台 灣子公司為例、國立政治大學 經營管理碩士學程研究所(EMBA)碩士論文。
    5. 周其鋒1995:母公司策略行為對子公司自主權之影響—兼論子公司興業傾向與子公司經理人社會資本之干擾效應、大葉大學國際企業管理學系研究所 碩士論文。
    6. 周啟明(2008), 台灣企業集團之國際化與集團資源及產業環境之關係。 國立政治大學 國際經營與貿易研究所 碩士論文。
    7. 曾志弘 2001,多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究-以多國籍企業在台子公司為例, 國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文。
    8. 尹懷鹿(2006),多國公司子公司的策略密碼 : 創新與整合,國立政治大學 經營管理碩士學程研究所(EMBA)碩士論文。
    9. 黃彥翔 (2010/03/29)電子時報digitimes
    10. 陳玉娟 (2010/02/04) 電子時報digitimes
    11. 劉賓陽、王富生 2008:探討跨國企業藉由協同合作機制以整合全球運籌策略之研究-以我國電機公司為對象,國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所 (EMBA)碩士論文。
    12. 財訊雙週刊349期2010, 有士氣才能打攻堅戰ㄧ文。
    13. 陳冠夫 2006、跨國企業海外子公司管理之探討,以台商在越南為例國立政治大學 國際經營與貿易研究所 碩士論文。
    14. 蘇怡如 2001,台灣集團企業多角化程度之探討成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,


    英文參考文獻
    1. GE 2007 Annual report
    2. GE 2007 Citizen report
    3. GE 2008 Annual report
    4. Delany, Ed (2000) Strategic development of the Multinational Subsidiary through Subsidiary initiative-taking, Long Range planning 33(2000) 220-244.
    5. Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S. (1986). Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Review, Nov/Dec, 64, 87-94.,
    6. Birkinshaw, J. and Morrison, A. (1995). Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaryes of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 729-754.
    7. Birkinshaw, J. and Hood, N. (1989). Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23, 774-795.
    8. Birkinshaw, J.(1997), “Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The Characteristics of Subsidiary initiative”, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 207-229
    9. Birkinshaw, J.and N. Hood.(1998), ”Building Firm-specific advantages in Multinational corporations: The role of Subsidiary initiative” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, 221-241
    10. Birkinshaw, J.(2000),” The determinants and consequences of subsidiary initiative in Multinational corporations” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practise Special issue on Corporate Entrepreneurship 2000, 24(1), 9-35
    11. Birkinshaw, J.Hood, N, and Young (2005) “Subsidiary Entrepreneurship internal and external Competitive forces, and Subsidiary Performance” International Buriness Review, 14
    12. Bouquet, C. and Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Weight versus Voice- How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 577-601.
    13. Crookell, H., & Morrision, AJ (1990). “Subsidiary Strategy in a Free Trade Environment” Business Quarterly, Autumn, 33-39. 1
    14. Dutton, J. E. and Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18, 397-428.
    15. Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., Hayes, E. and Wierba, E. E. (1997). Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 407-425.
    16. Ling, Y., Floyd, S. W. and Baldridge, D. C. (2005). Toward a model of issue-selling by subsidiary managers in multinational organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 637-654.
    17. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advent of nations. New York: Free Press.
    18. Rugman, A. and Verbeke, A. (2001). Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 237-250.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    96932034
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096932034
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback