English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51783791      Online Users : 526
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/95466
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95466


    Title: 自願性與強制性資訊揭露之均衡分析
    Authors: 簡曉晨
    Contributors: 李怡宗
    簡曉晨
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 16:22:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   資訊揭露的議題一直受到學者的研究探討;企業、投資人及競爭者間的微妙互動,現實中說謊的情境及強制揭露的規定,種種因素加諸後對於企業揭露之影響為本文之研究動機及目的。
      經濟學上強調市場自由的機制,強制性揭露在直覺上應會為企業帶來價值的減損,本文就自願性揭露的均衡來延伸推論若強制其揭露後所帶來的損失;另外過去分析性研究中強調企業揭露資訊皆為真,也就是企業不說謊,但現實中並非如此;本文利用簡單的賽局概念及並參考Wagenhofer(1990)集合的推論方式,對於說謊情境下的揭露均衡及強制性揭露可能為企業帶來的價值減損作一推論,並簡單的加以比較分析
      本文之研究結果如下:
      1、在可能說謊的情境下,企業並未必會揭露更多的資訊,雖然完全的揭露均衡存在,但條件相當嚴苛,因此部分揭露的範圍及可能性均增加。
      2、不論在是否能夠說謊的情境中,強制性揭露的規定均會為企業帶來價值的減損。
      3、在強制性的揭露下,說謊對於企業價值減損的影響並不一定,因為比較說謊與不說謊情境的不揭露的範圍大小並不一定,端視企業對於及市場投資大眾對於E(L*)的評價而定,當不揭露的範圍擴大,一但強制揭露,面臨損失的機會較大,反之則較小。
      Disclosure of information has been a topic of concern for a number of years. The relationship between enterprises, investors and competitors, lies in real world , rules of mandatory disclosure would have effects of enterprises’ decisions of disclosure. The effects are the motivation and the purpose of our research.
      Economic emphasizes the machinery of freedom of market. Mandatory disclosure in economical intuition would bring some loss of value of enterprises. In our research, we extend the result of research in the past to infer the loss of value of enterprises in mandatory disclosure system. Besides, the analytic research in the past supposed that information disclosed by enterprises was true, but it is not. We use simple idea of game theory and to consult the way that Wagenhofer (1990) used to infer the possible loss brought by mandatory disclosure and compare the results under different conditions.
      Our results are: (1)Under the condition of possible lying, enterprises are not necessary to disclose more information. The equilibrium of full disclosure still exists, but the assumption is very strict. (2)No matter under what kind of conditions , mandatory disclosure would bring loss of value of enterprise which compares to the result under voluntary disclosure. (3)Under mandatory disclosure system , the effect of loss of lying is not sure, because of the scope of nondisclosure is not sure. It depends on the degree of and the investors’ valuation of E(L*).
    Reference: 中文文獻
    1. 李建然,2000,影響台灣上市公司自願性盈餘預測頻率之研究,會計評論,第32期:49-80。
    2. 杜家媛,1999,盈餘宣告市場反場對自願性揭露誘因之實證研究,國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系未出版碩士論文。
    3. 吳安妮,1991,經理人員自願性揭露盈餘預測資訊給外界的決定因素─實證研究,會計評論,第25期:1-24。
    4. 吳安妮,1993,台灣經理人員主動揭露盈餘預測資訊內涵的實證研究,會計評論,第27期:76-107。
    5. 林憲平,2000,雙人競標之兩期模型,高雄第一科技大學金融營運系碩士班未出版碩士論文。
    6. 陳志健,1992,強制性增加揭露對於股票市場的影響,國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    7. 陳招美,1994,自願性揭露盈餘預測頻率之多寡之研究,私立東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    8. 陳子琦,1996,強制性財務預測資訊特性與內涵之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    9. 陳建樺,1997,管理當局自願性盈餘預測揭露行為之研究─時點分析,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    10. 陳隆麒,1999,當代財務管理,台北:華泰文化事業公司。
    11. 蔡玉璇,2000,強制性財務預測對股價及交易量影響之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    12. 謝淑貞,1995,賽局理論,台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。
    英文文獻
    Bagnoli, Susan G., and Watts. 2000. The effect of relative performance evaluation on earnings management: A game-theoretic approach. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19: 377-397.
    Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 159-178.
    Cho, I. K., and D. M. Kreps. 1987. Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quarterly Journal of Economics: 179-221.
    Darrough, M. N., and N. M. Stoughton. 1990. Financial disclosure policy in an entry game. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12: 383-394.
    Grossman, S. J. 1981. The information role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. Journal of Law and Economics: 461-483.
    Jovanovic, B. 1982. Truthful disclosure of information. Bell Journal of Economics 13 (Spring): 36-44.
    Milgrom, P. R. 1981. Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and application. Bell Journal of Economics 12 (Autumn): 380-391.
    Patell, J. M. 1976. Coporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical tests. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 246-276.
    Pownall, G., and G. Waymire. 1989. Voluntary disclosure credibility and securities prices: Evidence from management earnings forecasts, 1969-73. Journal of Accounting Research 27 (Autumn): 227-245.
    Verrecchia, R. E. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 179-194.
    Wagenhofer .1990. Voluntary disclosure with strategic opponent. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12: 351-363.
    Wong, J. 1988. Economic incentives for the voluntary disclosure of current cost financial statements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10: 151-167.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000448
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback