政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/95175
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51632800      Online Users : 602
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of MIS > Theses >  Item 140.119/95175


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95175


    Title: 電子郵件使用對知識工作者時間控制感之影響：以三階段混合方法探討
    The impact of e-mail usage on knowledge workers’ perceived control of time: a three phases mixed methods approach
    Authors: 林勝為
    Lin, Sheng Wei
    Contributors: 管郁君
    Huang, Eugenia Y.
    林勝為
    Lin, Sheng Wei
    Keywords: 電子郵件
    使用行為
    時間管理
    自我效能
    認知時間控制
    教育訓練
    E-mail
    E-mail usage behavior
    E-mail-specific time management behavior
    E-mail self-efficacy
    Perceived control of time
    E-mail management training
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 15:18:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在網際網路普及率高居不下的時代裡，知識工作者平日使用網路之時間比例已有逐年升高的趨勢。在這種潮流下，工作場域中知識工作者花費於網路訊息傳播的時間，佔用工作時間之比率驚人，尤以電子郵件為甚。對於使用電子郵件所產生的問題，使用者似乎感到能力不足，而且在面對超載的資訊流通量時，更覺得難以應付。因為個人不佳的電子郵件使用習慣所引發的問題，都會直接或間接衝擊到時間資源的運用以及增加時間的壓力。因此，瞭解如何有效處理電子郵件，對於知識工作者的生產力非常重要。
    本研究採用Creswell所提出之三階段混合方法探討研究議題。首先，第一階段採用質性之焦點群體訪談法，瞭解知識工作者典型的電子郵件使用行為。第二階段以大樣本的調查研究，探討知識工作者的人格主動性如何經由電子郵件管理行為影響其電子郵件使用時間控制感及工作時間控制感，並以社會認知理論及目標設定理論之整合觀點探討。第三階段以實地實驗的方式，在實際組織場域中進行員工電子郵件管理教育訓練，以觀察是否能產生訓練遷移之效果，亦即提升受訓者之電子郵件自我效能、電子郵件時間管理行為及電子郵件使用時間控制感。
    第一階段焦點群體訪談的重要結論包括：1)使用者被電子郵件支配著，但他們往往毫無知覺；2)日常工作使用上，電子郵件的弱點卻變成其強項；3)具有資訊系統背景的使用者，不必然會使用電子郵件工具的複雜功能；4)電子郵件被認為是平面媒體，而非即時互動媒體；5)電子郵件在工作場合，已經大幅度地取代面對面溝通；6)電子郵件使用者習慣性地使用副本轉寄功能，但並非出於真正的需要；7)使用者並不常將工作或個人電子郵件分開處理；8)使用者非常珍惜學習電子郵件功能的機會，但機會並非輕鬆即能獲得。有關以上相關結論及看法間之對照情況也在本文中提及。另外，本階段也歸納出有效率使用電子郵件之方法，並據以發展下一階段調查研究法之問卷。
    第二階段經由251位知識工作者之分析結果顯示，人格主動性透過電子郵件時間管理行為及電子郵件自我效能，可以推測電子郵件使用時間控制感及工作時間控制感。此外，電子郵件自我效能較高者，其電子郵件時間管理行為的評量分數也較高。
    第三階段實地實驗共涵蓋280位受測者，其中實驗組有175位，控制組有105位。ANCOVA分析之結果顯示，相較於控制組，實驗組之受測者經過教育訓練後展現較高的電子郵件自我效能及較佳的電子郵件時間控制感，但是受測者於訓練後並未投入更多心力於電子郵件時間管理行為。此外，接受此電子郵件訓練課程一個月後，平均每一位受訓者節省約17%之電子郵件使用時間。
    At the high widespread rate of the Internet era, the time spent on the Internet among knowledge workers has gradually increased. Because of this trend, these people have spent an alarming proportion of their work time on message communications tools, such as emails. Problems arising from e-mail management make users helpless particularly when they have to deal with information overload. Problems caused by inefficient e-mail use would directly/ indirectly affect the time resource, inevitably increasing time pressure to the workers. Therefore, it is essential for knowledge workers to understand how to use e-mail efficiently to heighten their productivity.
    This study adopted Creswell’s three-phases mixed methods to investigate our research issues. First, this study investigates the e-mail usage behavior of knowledge workers through an in-depth literature review and a focus group discussion. Then, a sample survey method, along with a social cognitive theory and a goal setting theory, was adopted to investigate how personality affects perceived control of time in the context of e-mail handling. The third phase includes a quasi-experimental field study carried out in an organizational setting to examine the effects of an e-mail management training program on e-mail self-efficacy, e-mail-specific time management behavior, and time control over e-mail use.
    The important findings in phase one include : 1) people are ruled by e-mail, but they think otherwise; 2) in daily usage, many weaknesses of e-mail are turned into strengths; 3) an information system background does not necessarily lead to sophistication in using e-mail tools; 4) e-mail is regarded as a print medium rather than an interactive medium; 5) e-mail to a large extent replaces face-to-face communication in the workplace; 6) e-mail users use the carbon copy and forwarding features habitually and not out of necessity; 7) users do not usually handle work-related and personal e-mail messages separately; and 8) users seek opportunities to learn about e-mail functionality out of convenience, but these are not attained with ease. A contrast between these findings and conventional wisdom concludes this study. In addition, we also conclude efficient e-mail usage approaches in this phase and develop the questionnaire for the next stage.
    Based on data collected from 251 knowledge workers in second phase, the results show that personality predicts perceived control of time in e-mail handling and work through both e-mail-specific time management behavior and e-mail self-efficacy. In addition, higher e-mail self-efficacy leads to improved e-mail-specific time management behavior.
    The field experiment in third phase includes 280 subjects, with 175 subjects in the experimental group, and 105 subjects in the control group, the ANCOVA results show that, after the training, the subjects exhibited greater e-mail self-efficacy and better time control over e-mail use but not paid more attention to e-mail-specific time management behavior According to the study reported here, this employee training program leads to a perceived time saving of about 17%.
    Reference: 參考文獻
    中文：
    張仁家 (2005)。企業訓練與發展。台北市：全華。
    陳沁怡 (2004)。訓練與發展。台北市：雙葉書廊。
    陳順宇 (2007)。結構方程模式－Amos操作。台北市：心理。
    楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢與李亦園（2004）。社會及行為科學研究法(上冊)。台北市：東華書局。
    葉光輝 (2007)。性格心理學理論與研究。台北：雙葉書廊。
    彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽（2006）。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報，第二十三卷第一期，77-98。
    資策會，http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx?page=many&id=219，2009[民98年4月21日]。
    戴國良 (2006)。組織行為學。台北市：五南。
    簡建忠 (1994)。訓練評鑑。台北市：五南。
    簡貞玉 (2002)。員工訓練與能力發展。台北市：五南。

    英文：
    Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.)Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
    Adams, G. A., & jex, S. M. (1999). Relationships between time management, control, work-family conflict, and strain. Journal of Occupational Health psychology, 1, 72-77.
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and Behavior, In A. Pratkanis, S. Breckler, and A Greenwaald (eds.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum and Associates, 241-269.
    Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619-645.
    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991). Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 732-740.
    Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys, Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.
    Bachiochi, P., & Weiner, S. (2002). Qualitative data collection and analysis. In S. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 161-183). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equations model. Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
    Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and direction for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-105.
    Balter, O. (2000). A keystroke-level analysis of e-mail message organization. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Netherlands, 105-112.
    Balter, O., & Sidner, C. L. (2001). Bifrost inbox organizer: Giving users control over the inbox. Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Denmark, 2, 111-118.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy in mechanism human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 1-60.
    Bandura, A. (1990). Self-regulation of motivation through anticipatory and self-reactive mechanisms. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38, 69-164.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
    Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 154-196). New York: Guilford.
    Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agent perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
    Bandura, A, & Cervone (1983). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 1017-1028.
    Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99.
    Bariff, M. L. & Ginzberg, M. J. (1982). Information systems and its underlying disciplines: MIS and the behavioral sciences: research patterns and prescriptions. Database, 14(1), 19-26.
    Barling, J., & Beattie, R. (1983). Self-efficacy beliefs and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 5, 41-51.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
    Baym, N. K. (1995). From practice to culture on Usenet. In S. L. Star (Ed.), The cultures of computing (pp. 28-52). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    Benson, D. H. (1983). A field study of end user computing: findings and Issues. MIS Quarterly, 7(4), 35-45.
    Bluedorn, A. C., Kaufman, C. J. & Lane, P. M. (1992). How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochromic and polychromic time. The Academy of Management Executive, 5(4), 17-26.
    Bond, M., & Feather N. (1988). Some correlates of structure and purpose in the use of time. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 55(2), 321-329.
    Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L., & Sein, M. K. (1990). The importance of learning style in end-user training. MIS Quarterly, 14(1), 101-119.
    Brett, J. M. (1984). Job transitions and personal and role development. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 2, 155-185.
    Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 405-410.
    Bryan, J. F., & Locke, E. A. (1967). Goal setting as a means of increasing motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 274-287.
    Burgess, A., Jackson, T., & Edwards, J. (2005). Email training significantly reduces email defects. International Journal of Information Management, 25(1), 71-83.
    Burgess, A., Jackson, T., & Edwards, J. (2006). A simple approach to improving email communication. Communications of the ACM, 49(6), 107-109.
    Burkhardt, M. E., & Brass, D. J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104-127.
    Calabresi, R., & Cohen, J. (1968). Personality and time attitudes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73(5), 431-439.
    Cascio, W. F. (1991). Applied psychology in personnel management (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Cervone, D., & Peake, P. K. (1986). Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 492-501.
    Cervone, D., & Williams, S. L. (1992). Social cognitive theory and personality. In Caprara, G. & Van Heck, G. L. (Eds.), Modern personality psychology (pp. 200-252). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    Claessens, B. J., Can Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Roe, R. A. (2004). Planning behavior and perceived control of time at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 1-13.
    Claessens, Van Eerde, Rutte, & Roe (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36(2), 255-276.
    Compeau, D. R. (2007). How much do you know? Impact, 13(5), Retrieved May 25, 2008, from http://www.ivey.uwo.ca/Publications/Impact/default.htm.
    Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995a). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
    Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995b). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inforamtion Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143.
    Connor, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 1429-1464.
    Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practice in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 147-168.
    Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. In Dunnette MD (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 223-326). Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Cook, T. D., & Camphell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Cottle, T. J. (1976). Perceiving Time: A Psychological Investigation with Men and Women. New York: Wiley and Sons.
    Compeau, D.R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
    Crant, J. M. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 532-537.
    Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Dabbish, L. A., & Kraut, R. E. (2006). Email overload at work: An analysis of factors associated with email strain. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Canada, 431-440.
    Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business. New York: Accenture.
    Davenport, T. H. (2005). Thinking for a living: How to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Davis, F.D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
    Debrand, C. C., & Johnson, J. J. (2008). Gender differences in email and instant messaging: A study of undergraduate business information systems students. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 20-30.
    Detterman, D. K. (1993). The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Determan & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trail: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction, pp. 68-98. Norwood, NJ; Ablex.
    Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. NY: Harper.
    Ducheneaut, N., & Bellotti, V. (2001). E-mail as habitat: An exploration of embedded personal information management. Interactions, 30-38.
    Debrand, C. C., & Johnson, J. J. (2008). Gender differences in email and instant messaging: A study of undergraduate business information systems students. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 20-30.
    Ducheneaut, N., & Watts, L. A. (2005). In search of coherence: A review of e-mail research. Human-Computer Interaction, 20, 11-48.
    Emanuel, H. M. (1982). Put time on your side. Management world, 11, 30-31.
    Fisher, C. D., Schoenfeldt, L. F., Shaw, J. B. (1990). Human resource management. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
    Frazee, V. (1996). Is e-mail doing more harm than good? Personnel Journal, 23.
    Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In Staw, B. M. & Sutton, R. M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187.
    Fuerst, W. L., & Cheney, P. H. (1982). Factors affecting the perceived utilization of computer-based decision support systems in the oil industry. Decision Sciences, 13, 554-569.
    Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender difference in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400.
    Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 884-891.
    Godbey, G.. (2003). The harried leisure class. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(4), 478-480.
    Goldstein, I. L. (1993). Training in organizations; Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (3rd ed.). Monterey, CA: Books/Cole.
    Green, P., & Skinner, D. (2005). Does time management training work: An evaluation. International Journal of Training and Development, 9, 124-139.
    Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tarham, R. L., Ronald, L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prenice Hall, 5th ed.
    Hall, B. L., & Hursch, D. E. (1982). An evaluation of the effects of a time management training program on work efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 3, 73-98.
    Hess, J. M. (1968). Group interviewing. In King, R. L. (Ed.), New Science of Planning. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
    Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1981). The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing system. Communications of the ACM, 24(11), 739-751.
    Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104-121.
    Hollenbeck, J. R., Klein, H. J., O’Leary, A. M., & Wright, P. M. (1989). Investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 951-956.
    Horibe, F. (1999). Managing knowledge workers. Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
    IDC (2007, April). The future of email as it navigates through a resurgence of spam and real-time market substitutes. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS20639307.
    Igbaria, M., Pavri, F. N., & Huff, S. L. (1989). Microcomputer applications: An empirical look at usage. Information and Management, 16, 187-196.
    Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.
    Jackson, T. W., Dawson, R., & Wilson, D. (2003). Understanding email interaction increases organizational productivity. Communications of the ACM, 46(8), 80-84.
    Jenkins, C. D., Zyzanski, S. J., and Rosenman, M. D. (1979). Jenkins Activity Survey, New York: Pschological Corporation.
    Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
    King, A. C., Winett, R. A., & Lovett, S. B. (1986). Enhancing coping behaviors in at-risk populations: the effects of time management instruction and social support in women from dual-earner families. Behavior Therapy, 17, 57-66.
    Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58-74.
    Kirkpatrick D. L. (1967). Evaluation of Training In Craig R. L. Eds, Training and Development Handbook, New York: Mcgraw-Hill, pp.86-112.
    Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
    Knapp, R. H., & Garbutt, J. T. (1958). Time imagery and the achievement motive. Journal of Personality, 26, 426–434.
    Krueger, R. A. (1998). Developing Questions for Focus Groups (Focus Group Kit, Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Kaufman, C., Lane P, & Lindquist J. (1991). Exploring more than 24 hours a day: A preliminary investigation of polychronic time use. Journal of Consumer Research 18(3), 392-410.
    Kaufman, C., & Lindquist, J. D. (1999). Time management and polychronicity: Comparisons, contrasts, and insights for the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 288-312.
    Lakein, A. (1973). How to get control of your time and your life. New York: New American Library.
    Landy, F. J., Rastegary, H., Thayer, J., & Colvin, C. (1991). Time urgency: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 644-657.
    Lantz, A. (1998). Heavy users of electronic mail. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10, 361-379.
    Lantz, A. (2003). Does the use of e-mail change over time? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15(3), 419-431.
    Latham, G. P., Winters, D. C. & Locke, E. A. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 49-63.
    Lay, C. H., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1993). Trait procrastination, time management, and academic behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 647-662.
    Lewis, C. (1990). Microcomputer training demands targeted attention. Savings Institutions, 11(4), 53.
    Linder, S. (1970). Harried Leisure Class. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Locke, E. A. (1991). The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50, 288-299.
    Locke, E. A. (2002). The epistemological side of teaching management: Teaching through principles. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 195-205.
    Locke, E. A., Frederick, E., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 241-251.
    Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
    Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2004). What should we do about motivation theory? Six recommendations for the twenty-first century. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 388-403.
    Lucas, H. C. Jr. (1974). Systems quality, user reactions and the use of information systems. Management Informatics, 3(4), 207-212.
    Mace, C. A. (1935). Incentives: Some experimental studies (Report No. 72). London: Industrial Health Research Board.
    Macan, T. H. (1994). Time management: test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 381-391.
    Macan, T. H. (1996). Time management training: Effects on time behaviors, attitudes, and job performance. The Journal of Psychology, 130, 229-236.
    Macan, T. H., Shahani, C., Dipboye, R. L., & Phillips, A. P. (1990). College students’ time management: correlations with academic performance and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 760-768.
    Mackay, W. E. (1988). Diversity in the use of electronic mail: A preliminary inquiry. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(4), 380-397.
    Mackay, W. E., Malone, T. W., Crowston, K., Rao, R., Rosenblitt, D., & Card, S. K. (1989). How do experienced information lens users use rules? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 21l-216.
    Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
    Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 764-773.
    Martocchio, J. J., & Webster, J. (1992). The effects of feedback and microcomputer playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 553-578.
    Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1990). The Focused Interview. New York: The Free Press.
    Miner, J. B. (1978). Twenty years of research on role-motivation theory of managerial effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 31, 739-760.
    Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing the invariances in personality and the role of situations. Psychological Review, 102, 246-286.
    Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College students’ academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American Journal of Health Studies, 16(1), 41-51.
    Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
    Morgan, D. L. (1998). Planning Focus Groups (Focus Group Kit, Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Morgan, T. P., Cozzi, A., & Farrell, S. P. (2005). Unified activity management: Supporting people in e-business. Communications of the ACM, 48(12), 67-70.
    Nelson, R. R., & Cheney, P. H. (1987). Training ender user: An exploratory study. MIS Quarterly, 11(4), 547-559.
    Noe, R. A. (1998). Employee training and development. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
    O’Leary, V. E. (1972). The Hawthorne effect in reverse: Effects of training and practice on individual and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 491-494.
    Olfman, L., & Pitsatorn, P. (2000). End-user training research: Status and models for the future. In Robert, W. Z. & Michael, F. P. (Eds.), 2000 Framing the domains of IT management, 129-146.
    Orpen, C. (1993). The effect of time-management training on employee attitudes and behaviour: A field experiment. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 393-406.
    Parsons, M., & Greenwood, J. (2000). A guide to the use of focus groups in health care research: Part 1. Contemporary Nurse, 9, 169-180.
    Pazzani, M., California, U., & Irvine, C. A. (2000). Knowledge discovery from data?. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their applications, 15(2), 10-12.
    Peeters, M. A., & Rutte, C. G. (2005). Time management behavior as a moderator for the job demand-control interaction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(1), 64-75.
    Perry, D. E., Staudenmayer, N. A., & Votta, L. G. (1994). People, organizations, and process improvement. IEEE Software, July, 36-45.
    Pervin, L. A., Cervone, D., & John, O. P. (2005). Personality theory and research (9th). John Wiley & Sons.
    Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects, Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
    Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2004). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods (7th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
    Povey, R., Conner, M., Sparks, P., Rhiannon, J., & Spephard, R. (2000). Application of the theory of planned behavior to two dietary behaviors: Roles of perceived control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 121-139.
    RADICATI (2008, April). RADICATI market numbers summary update- Q1. Retrieved April 2, 2008, from http://www.radicati.com/.
    Raymond, L. (1988). The impact of computer training on the attitudes and usage behavior of small business managers. Journal of Small Business Management, 26, 8-13.
    Raymond, A. N. (1998). Employee training and development. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
    Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (2005). Busyness as usual, Social Research: An International Quarterly of Social Sciences, 72(2), 407-426.
    Ryan, T. A. (1970). Intentional behavior. NY: Ronald Press.
    Sackett, P. R., & Mullen, E. J. (1993). Beyond formal experimental design: Towards an expanded view of the training evaluation process. Personnel Psychology, 46(3), 613-627.
    Schweigert, W. A. (2006). Research methods in psychology. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
    Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845-874.
    Seligman, M. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development and death. San Francisco: Freeman.
    Sieber, S. D. (1973). The integration of field work and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1335-1359.
    Simon, S.J., & Werner, J.M. (1996). Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches: A fields experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 648-659.
    Slaven, G., & Totterdell, P. (1993). Time management training: Does it transfer to the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 8, 20-28.
    Slocombe, T. E., & Bluedorn, A. C. (1999). Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work-unit polychronicity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(1), 75-99.
    Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
    Szajna, B., & Mackay, J. M. (1995). Predictors of learning performance in a computer-user training environment: A path-analytic study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(2), 167-185.
    Takkinen, J., & Shahmehri, N. (1998). CAFE: A conceptual model for managing information in electronic mail. Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, U.S.A., 44-53.
    Tang, K. C., & Davis, A. (1995). Critical factors in the determination of sample size. Family Practice, 12, 474-475.
    Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Taylor, M. S., E. A. Locke, C. Lee, & M. E. Gist (1984). Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms. Organizational behavior and human Performance, 34, 402-418.
    Taylor, J., & Mackenzie, R. A. (1986). Time is money, so use it productively. ABA Banking Journal, 78, 130-133.
    Torkzadeh, G., & Koufteros, X. (1994). Factorial validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 813-821.
    Torkzadeh, G., & Pflughoeft, K. (1996). Computer self-efficacy and training effectiveness: An empirical study. In Ebert, R. & Franz, L. (Eds.), 1996 Proceeding of the Decision Sciences Institute Annual Meeting, 2, 1996, 790-792.
    Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479-494.
    Van Eerde, W. (2003). Procrastination at work and time management training. Journal of Psychology, 137, 421-434.
    Van Solingen, Berghout, E., & Van Latum, F. (1998). Interrupts: Just a minute never is. IEEE Software, September/October, 97-103.
    Victor, S., Kelly, M., & Ammon, B. (2002). Effects of training on computer-mediated communication in a single or mixed gender small task group. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 257-269.
    Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
    Warner, L., & Smith, T. (1990). Computer training: Necessity not Luxury. Management accounting, 68(3), 48.
    Weber, R. (2004). The grim reaper: The curse of e-mail. MIS Quarterly, 28(3), iii-xiii.
    Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. J. (1995). The differential effects of software training previews on training outcomes. Journal of Management, 21(4), 757-787.
    Wessman, A. E. (1973). Personality and the subjective experience of time. Journal of Personality Assessment, 37(2), 103-114.
    Whittaker, S., & Sidner, C. (1996). Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Canada, 276-283.
    Williams, R. L., Verble, J. S., Price, D. E., & Layne, B. H. (1995). Relationship between time management practices and personality indices and types. Journal of Psychological Type, 34, 36-42.
    Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
    Zhao, J. J. (2005). Computer end-user skills important for business professionals now and toward 2005. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(3), 31-37.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    93356502
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0933565021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of MIS] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2272View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback