English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114393/145446 (79%)
Visitors : 53039195      Online Users : 244
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/95148
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95148


    Title: 企業上市目的與長期報酬相關性之研究
    The motivation and long-term performance of firm IPO
    Authors: 陳正諭
    Chen, Cheng Yu
    Contributors: 盧秋玲
    Lu, Chiu Ling
    陳正諭
    Chen, Cheng Yu
    Keywords: 初次上市
    上市動機
    股票發行種類
    閉鎖期
    IPO
    Motivation
    Type of shares offering
    Lockup period
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 15:16:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 企業上市的目的有很多種,我們認為一家公司若是為了替未來的投資機會融資而上市,其長期報酬應顯著較其他非為了投資機會籌資的公司為佳。結果我們發現,在一般認為可作為「籌資」的代理變數─「賣新股」的公司中,這些公司的長期負報酬程度比其他公司更嚴重。在發行股票種類的選擇上,選擇賣老股的公司相較之下有上市前公司獲利較佳、成立時間更久的特性;另一方面,訂較長閉鎖期的公司長期報酬也顯著比較差,這些公司募資的規模則較小、並且通常無創投參與。我們認為有兩種可能:(1) 以股票發行種類為上市目的的代理變數可能不盡理想;(2) 上市的成本超過欲上市籌資的公司經理人所估計。導致這些公司長期負報酬更加的嚴重。
    There are many reasons why companies go public. We suppose that companies going public to finance future investment should have better long-term performance than others. As a result, we find strong evidence that the long-term underperformance among primary-share only offering companies which are considered having motivation to finance future investment, are more severe than other companies. In the determinants of choosing which type of shares offering, a company which is old or have better return of equity before listing would have higher probability offering secondary shares. On the other hand, companies setting longer lockup period perform worse. These companies are usually small and have no venture capital backed. We propose two possible explanations to these situations: one is that using type of shares offering as a proxy of motivation of a firm going public is inappropriate; the other is that the cost of a firm going public is beyond a manager’s estimation, resulting the more poor long-term performance of these companies.
    Reference: Bartlett, Joseph W., 1995, Equity finance: Venture capital, buyouts, restructurings, and reorganizations, John Wiley, New York.

    Bradley, Daniel J., Bradford D. Jordan, Ivan C. Roten, and Ha-Chin Yi, 2001, Venture capital and IPO lockup expiration: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Research 24, 465-492.

    Brau, James C. and Stanley E. Fawcett, 2006, Initial public offerings: An analysis of theory and practice. Journal of Finance 61, 399-436.

    Brav, Alon and Paul A. Gompers, 2003, The role of lockups in initial public offerings. The Review of Financial Studies 16, 1-29.

    Chen, Hsuan-Chi and Chiuling Lu, 2006, How much do REITS pay for their IPOs? Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 33, 105-125.

    Carter, Richard B., Frederick H. Dark, and Ajai K. Singh, 1998, Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. Journal of Finance 53, 285-311.

    Field, Laura C. and Gordon Hanka, 2001, The expiration of IPO share lockups. Journal of Finance 56, 471-500.

    Huyghebaert N. and C. V. Hulle, 2006, Structuring the IPO: Empirical evidence on the portions of primary and secondary shares. Journal of Corporate Finance 12, 296-320.

    Kim, Woojin and Michael S. Weisbach, 2008, Motivations for public equity offers: An international perspective. Journal of Financial Economics 87, 281-307.

    Kim, Jaemin, Kuntara Pukthuanthong-Le, and Thomas Walker, 2008, Leverage and IPO under-pricing: High-tech versus low-tech IPOs. Management Decision 46, 106-130.

    La porta, Rafael, Florenzo Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny, 1997, Legal determinants of external finance, Journal of Finance 52, 1131-1150.

    Loughran, Tim and Jay R. Ritter, 1995, The new issues puzzle. Journal of Finance 50, 23-51.

    Loughran, Tim and Jay R. Ritter, 2004, Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management 33, 5-37.

    Nachman, David C. and Thomas H. Noe, 1994, Optimal design of securities under Asymmetric information. Review of Financial Studies 7, 1-44.

    Pagano, Marco, Fabio Panetta, and Luigi Zingales, 1998, Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance 53, 27-64.

    Pukthuanthong-Le, Kuntara and Nikhil Varaiya, 2007, IPO pricing, block Sales, and long-term performance. Financial Review 42, 319-348.

    Röell, Ailsa, 1996, The decision to go public: An overview. European Economic Review 40, 1071-1081.

    Ritter, Jay R., 1991, The long-run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of finance 46, 3-27.

    Schenone, Carola, 2004, The effect of banking relationships on the firm’s IPO underpricing. Journal of Finance 59, 2903-2958.

    Shen, Yang-Pin and Peihwang Wei, 2007, Why do companies choose to go IPOs? New results using data from Taiwan. Journal of Economics and Finance 31, 359-367.

    Stewart C. Myers and Nicholas S. Majluf, 1984, Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    96357027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096357027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2308View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback