政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/95071
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造访人次 : 51876235      在线人数 : 589
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95071


    题名: 實質匯率,外人直接投資與中國對外貿易關係之研究
    作者: 邱如伶
    贡献者: 陳坤銘
    饒秀華
    邱如伶
    关键词: 實質匯率
    外人直接投資
    中國
    對外貿易
    日期: 2009
    上传时间: 2016-05-09 14:53:36 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 中國經濟的崛起，改寫了世界貿易的版圖。但近年來中國的貿易收支失衡問題，特別是中國對於美國的持續大幅貿易順差以及對日本的持續大幅貿易逆差，一方面導致美國對中國匯率政策的強烈批評，另一方面也開始引起學者對於中國能否透過人民幣匯率的調整解決其貿易收支問題的研究興趣。惟最近一些實證研究發現，由於全球生產網路之發展，導致實質匯率與中國對外貿易之關係中出現一些傳統貿易理論難以解釋之現象，對於中國能否透過匯率政策之調整以解決其貿易收支問題也仍未有一致的結論。
    本論文之目的在於研究中國近年來對外貿易之主要決定因素，尤其是深入探討實質匯率以及外人直接投資在中國對外貿易發展中所扮演的角色。由於美國以及日本為中國最主要的貿易夥伴，本論文的研究內容聚焦於中美與中日貿易決定因素之比較研究。本論文之主要創新在於實證模型之建構。本論文的實證模型與過去文獻的主要差異有數點：1. 本論文建立聯立方程體系以分析出口供需之相互影響。2. 在供給面本論文考慮了外人直接投資以及進口中間財對中國出口供給或其進口產業之國內生產的可能影響。3. 在進出口需求函數中，除了雙邊實質匯率，本論文也考慮了第三國匯率以及外人直接投資可能產生的間接影響。4. 在中國進口需求函數中本論文將實質所得拆解成國內需求與加工出口兩部分，以比較中國國內需求與加工出口在進口傾向上的差異。
    本論文實證結果顯示，在實質匯率的影響方面，當人民幣對美元實質升值，確實能降低中國對美出口。惟因為出口下降導致加工出口所需之進口中間財與資本財減少，造成中國自美之進口金額不增反降。由於進口減少的幅度更甚於出口，因此人民幣升值對於降低中美貿易順差的效果難以顯現。此外，當人民幣對日圓實質貶值時，雖然刺激中國對日本的出口，但因應加工出口所需而進口的中間財與資本財將因此增加，進而使中國自日本的總進口上揚，如此一來將抵銷匯率貶值改善貿易收支逆差的效果。至於第三國匯率的波動，對中美或中日貿易收支也有一些間接影響，例如經由影響中國自這些地區進口中間投入之成本或透過與中國在美日最終財市場的競爭或互補關係。由此可知，在全球生產網路盛行的今天，中國似乎不易單獨透過匯率政策之調整以解決其貿易收支失衡的問題。
    在外人直接投資的影響方面，本論文實證結果顯示，日本外資企業在中國的投資，一方面雖提升中國對日本的出口，但另一方面因為在中國生產外資企業需要大量進口零組件與加工產品，造成中國來自日本的進口大幅增加，結果造成中國對日本的貿易逆差情況雪上加霜。相反地，美國對中國的直接投資增加對中國對美出口並未有所助益，反而有提升自美進口的作用，有助於改善中美貿易失衡。但是，來自其他國家企業在中國的投資，一方面將加工生產完成的產品大量輸往美國，另一方面，這些企業在中國生產應付當地市場的產品取代來自美國的進口產品，導致中國對美國貿易順差的擴大。由此可見，外人直接投資在中國對外貿易收支失衡問題上亦扮演十分重要的角色。
    至於實質所得對進口的影響方面，本論文實證結果顯示，中國的國內需求提升雖然會誘使來自美國或日本的進口增加，但是相對幅度有限，而因中國的加工出口所引發的進口增加卻十分顯著。此外，美國實質所得提高而誘發美國自中國進口的彈性相當可觀，日本實質所得提高而誘發日本自中國進口的彈性則相對有限，而中國國內需求提升對自美進口的效果更是微不足道。此結果顯示，中國與其主要貿易夥伴在消費者偏好上的差異，也對中國對外貿易收支失衡有一定的影響力。
    The emergence of China’s economy has changed territorial boundaries on the global trade map. China’s recent external trade imbalance, especially its huge and persistent trade surplus with the U.S. and its deficits towards Japan, has provoked serious critique from the U.S. on China’s exchange rate policy and at the same time has attracted research interest in the issue: Can a Renminbi (RMB) revaluation improve China’s problem over its trade imbalance? Because of the development of the global production network in recent years, some studies have found some puzzles in the relation between the RMB’s real exchange rate and China’s foreign trade, which are inexplicable from the viewpoint of traditional trade theory. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of a RMB revaluation in adjusting China’s trade imbalance either.
    The objective of this thesis is to study the determinants of China’s external trade, particularly the roles played by the real exchange rate of the RMB and foreign direct investment (FDI) into China. Because U.S. and Japan are two major trade partners of China, this dissertation focuses on comparing the determinants of Sino-U.S. trade and Sino-Japan trade. The main contribution of this dissertation is its construction of novel empirical models, which differ from most previous studies in the following aspects: 1. We construct a system of equations to examine the demand-supply relationship; 2. On the supply side, the effects of FDI and intermediate imports on China’s export are considered; 3. On the demand side, in additional to bilateral real exchange rates, the indirect effects of a third-country’s exchange rates and FDI on China’s exports and imports are also incorporated into the models; 4. In China’s import demand function, we decompose real income into domestic demand and export demand, with a view to comparing the effects of China’s domestic demand and export processing due to their differences in import propensities.
    This thesis’ empirical results indicate that the real appreciation of the RMB against the US dollar can reduce China’s exports to the U.S., however, the decrease in exports causes a larger decline in China’s imports of intermediate goods from the U.S. for export processing purposes. Hence, the real appreciation of the RMB seems ineffective in improving China-U.S. trade balance. Moreover, the real depreciation of the RMB against the Yen has similar counterbalancing effects: it stimulates China’s exports to Japan and at the same time increases China’s intermediate goods and capital goods imports from there. As a result, China’s trade deficits might not be improved significantly from the real depreciation of its currency. The empirical evidence of this thesis reveals that changes in third-country’s exchange rates can also bring about indirect effects on China’s trade imbalance either through their impact on the import costs of intermediate goods from those countries or their substitutive or complementary relationships in the final good markets in the U.S. and Japan. Therefore, China seems unable to adjust its trade imbalance unilaterally through an exchange rate policy.
    As for the impact of FDI into China, we show that Japanese FDI towards China stimulates China’s exports to Japan, but also raises its import demand from Japan, because of the processing production of Japanese enterprises in China. As a result, Japan’s FDI makes the Sino-Japan trade imbalance even worse. On the contrary, FDI from the U.S. into China does not stimulate American exports to China, but does increase China’s imports from the U.S., which can improve Sino-U.S. trade balance. Third-country FDI into China significantly enhances China’s exports to the U.S. on the one hand, while its products become substitutes for U.S. exports into China’s market on the other. Hence, it is another driving force for the aggravation of Sino-U.S. trade surplus. In a nutshell, FDI has played a very important role in China’s trade imbalance problem.
    Finally, empirical results from the effects of real income on import demand indicate that China’s import demand stimulated by its export processing activity is very significant. In addition, while the relationship between China’s domestic demand and its imports from the U.S. or Japan is positive, the magnitude is rather limited. In contrast, the income elasticity of U.S. import demand from China is very high, but the income elasticity of Japan’s import demand from China is relatively small. To sum up, China’s trade imbalance problem seems attributable to the differences in preference among consumers in China and its major trade partners to some extent.
    參考文獻: 中國投資指南，中國商務部外資司網站，http://www.fdi.gov.cn/ 。
    中國統計年鑑（2008），中國國家統計局，http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2008/indexch.htm。
    王浩（2006），<中國FDI現況與未來趨勢>，《台灣經濟研究月刊》，第29卷，第3期，2006年3月，頁74-82。
    包群、彭水軍、賴明勇（2004），<技術外溢、吸收能力與內生經濟增長理論及中國的經驗研究>，2004年中國經濟學年會論文。
    吳敬璉（2005），《當代中國經濟改革：探索中國經濟順利轉型的秘密》，美商麥格羅˙希爾國際股份有限公司，台灣分公司。
    官春峰（1991）， <人民幣匯率調整的外貿效應分析>，見厲以寧、秦宛順(編)《中國對外經濟與國際收支研究》，第四章，頁117-149。北京：國際文化出版公司。
    揚帆（2005），<人民幣匯率制度歷史回顧>，《中國經濟史研究》 4: 1-8。
    曾錚、張亞斌（2007），<人民幣實質匯率升值與中國出口商品結構調整>，《世界經濟》5:16-24。
    蔡昉與林毅夫（2003），《中國經濟：透析全球最大經濟體，掌握大陸市場經營契機》，美商麥格羅˙希爾國際股份有限公司，台灣分公司。
    盧向前與戴國強（2005），<人民幣實際匯率波動對我國進出口的影響：1994～2003>，《經濟研究》 5: 31-39。
    戴祖祥（1997），<我國貿易收支的彈性分析：1981～1995>，《經濟研究》 7: 55-62。

    Abbott, A. J. and H. R. Seddighi (1996), “Aggregate Imports and Expenditure Components in the UK: An Empirical Analysis,” Applied Economics, Vol. 28(9): 1119-1125.
    Armington, Paul S. (1969), “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol.16: 159-178.
    Arndt, S. W. (2007), “MNCs, FDI and Production Networks,” Third Annual APEA Conference in Hong Kong.
    Aziz, J. and X. Li (2008), “China’s Changing Trade Elasticities,” China and World Economy, Vol.16(3): 1-21.
    Baak, S. J. (2008), “The Bilateral Real Exchange Rates and Trade between China and the U.S.,” China Economic Review, Vol.19(2): 117-127.
    Bosworth, B. and S. M. Collins (2008), “United States-China Trade: Where are the Exports?” Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Vol.6(1): 1-21.
    Cushman, D. (1985), “Real Exchange Rate Risk, Expectations, and the Level of Direct Investment,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.67(2): 297-308.
    Engle R. F. and C.W.J. Granger (1987), “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing,” Econometrica, Vol.55(2): 251-276.
    Froot, K. and J.C. Stein (1991), “Exchange Rates and Foreign Direct Investment: An Imperfect Capital Markets Approach,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.106(4): 1191-1217.
    Garcia-Herrero, Alicia and Tuuli Koivu (2009), “China’s Exchange Rate Policy and Asian Trade,” BIS Working Papers, No. 282.
    Giovannetti, G. (1989), “Aggregated Imports and Expenditure Components in Italy: An Econometric Analysis,” Applied Economics, Vol.21(7): 957-971.
    Goldstein, M. and M. S. Khan (1985), “Income and Price Elasticities in Foreign Trade,” in R. W. Jones and P. B. Kenen (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. II, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 20: 1042-1105.
    Granger, C.W.J. (1981), “Some Properties of Time Series Data and Their Use in Econometric Model Specification,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol.16: 121-130.
    Hale, G. and C. Long (2006), “Firm Ownership and FDI Spillovers in China,” mimeo, Yale University.
    Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., and Y. Shin (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol.115(1): 53-74.
    IMF (2005), “Asia-Pacific Economic Outlook,” Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
    Iwatsubo, K. and S. Karikomi (2006), “China Reform on Exchange Rate System and International Trade between Japan and China,” PRI Discussion Paper, Series No. 06A-20.
    Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol.12: 231-254.
    Kamada, K. and I. Takagawa (2005), “Policy Coordination in East Asia and across the Pacific,” Bank of Japan Working Paper No. 05-E-4.
    Kao, C. (1999), “Spurious Regression and Residual-based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data, ” Journal of Econometrics, Vol.90: 1-44.
    Kao, C. and M. H. Chiang (2000), “On the Estimation and Inference of a Cointegrated Regression in Panel Data,” Advances in Econometrics, Vol.15: 179-222.
    Kitamura Y. and P. C. B. Phillips (1997), “Fully Modified IV, GIVE and GMM Estimation with Possibly Non-stationary Regressors and Instruments,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol.80: 85-123.
    Kohlhagen, S. W. (1977), “Exchange Rate Changes, Profitability and Direct Foreign Investment,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol.68: 43-52.
    Levin, A., Lin, C. F. and C. S. Chu (2002), “Unit-root Test in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol.108: 1-24.
    Liu, Z. (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Spillover: Evidence from China,” Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol.30(3): 579-602.
    Marquez, J. and J. W. Schindler (2006), “Exchange-Rate Effects on China’s Trade: An Interim Report.” Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, International Finance Discussion Papers No. 861.
    Min, B. S., Mohammad, H. A. and T. C. Tang (2002), “An Analysis of South Korea’s Import Demand,” Journal of Asia-Pacific Affairs, Vol. 4: 1-17.
    Moazzami, B. and E. Wong (1988), “Income and Price Elasticities of China’s Trade,” Asian Economic Review, Vol. 30: 218-230.
    Pedroni P. (1999), “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors.” Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics, Vol. 61: 653-70.
    Pedroni P. (2004), “Panel Cointegration, Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis,” Econometric Theory, Vol. 20(3): 597-625.
    Phillips, P.C.B. and P. Perron (1988), “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression,” Biometrika, Vol.75: 335-346.
    Phillips, Peter C. B. and B. E. Hansen (1990), “Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol.57: 99-125.
    Rahman, M. and W. Thorbecke (2007), “How would China`s Exports be Affected by a Unilateral Appreciation of the RMB and a joint Appreciation of Countries Supplying Intermediate Imports?” RIETI Discussion Paper No. 07-E-012, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Tokyo.
    Said, S.E. and D.A. Dickey (1984), “Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order,” Biometrika, Vol.71(3): 599-607.
    Saikkonen, P. (1991), “Asymptotically Efficient Estimation of Cointegration Regressions,” Econometric Theory, Vol.7(1): 1–21.
    Senhadji, A. (1998), “Time-series Estimation of Structural Import Demand Equations: A Cross-Country Analysis,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol.45(2): 236-268.
    Tang, T. C. (2003), “An Empirical Analysis of China’s Aggregate Import Demand Function,” China Economic Review, Vol.14(2): 142-163.
    Thorbecke, W. and G. Smith (2008), “How Would an Appreciation of the RMB and Other East Asian Currencies Affect China’s Exports?” Review of International Economics, Forthcoming.
    Xing, Y. (2007), “Foreign Ddirect Investment and China’s Bilateral Intra-industry Trade with Japan and the US.” Journal of Asian Economics, Vol.18(4): pp. 685-700.
    Xu, X. (2002), “The Dynamic-optimizing Approach to Import Demand: A Structural Model.” Economics Letters, Vol. 74(2): 265-270.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    92351504
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923515041
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2281检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈