 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 52919774
Online Users : 825
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94996
|
| Title: | 分離自決的國際法內涵與實踐 |
| Other Titles: | The Meaning and Practice of Self-Determination in International Law |
| Authors: | 張顯超
Chang, Hsien-Chao |
| Keywords: | 國家分離;國家主權;自決權;兩岸關係
secession;sovereignty;self-determination;cross-strait relations |
| Date: | 2006-09 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-05-09 14:04:05 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 「自決」一詞，在民主政治的發展上，主要是指人民享有選擇自己政府\\r 與統治形式的權利。而自決運動，在多元面貌的發展之下，卻是變得極為複\\r 雜而難解。國際政治與國際法在不同時空背景之下，賦予自決不同的定義與\\r 權利。而20 世紀90 年代以後的自決運動實踐，已經遠遠超過60 年代殖民 地解放運動的範圍。造成此一急遽發展，歸因於蘇聯解體與冷戰時代的結 束、國際政治大環境對人權原則的重視，以及近來開放民主與自由經濟理論\\r 的提倡等三大因素。雖然當前的國際法多不願意明白承認殖民地以外分離自\\r 決的合法性，但晚近20 年的分離自決實踐中，仍有許多非屬殖民地的國家 分離運動得以在國際見證下成功。在主權國家實踐上，西方民主國家對於自\\r 決已逐漸採取民主與開放的政治態度。然而有共黨歷史背景的國家，對於分\\r 離自決運動，有些仍堅持傳統主權觀與不惜使用武力。以俄羅斯車臣共和國\\r 獨立事件為例，長期戰爭的嚴重代價，讓俄、車雙方的政府與人民均難以承\\r 受。要如何協調主權國家與分離自決者的嚴重衝突，國際社會迄今仍沒有發\\r 展出一套可被大多數接受的政治或法律準則。對於經常處理種族衝突與自決\\r 爭端的聯合國而言，維持國際和平與共同發展，或應是解決此類爭端的最高\\r 方針。就台灣的自決公投而論，必須注意的是，如果未經國際社會同意而單\\r 方貿然的採取政治行動，非但是有極為高度的國家安全風險，而且是要擔負\\r 影響區域安全的政治責任。
Self-determination is a concept in principle, by which the people having rights to form their own state or government. However, the movement of self-determination of the 20th century is becoming a very complicated issue with various definitions under international politics and laws. Since the 1990s, the practice of self-determination movement has far exceeded the legal framework, as originally considered for the independence of post-war colonies in the 1960s. The increasing relevance and importance of the problem in secession are due to the changing international climate. The collapse of the bipolar world during the Cold War, together with a more persistent trend toward greater recognition of human right and the advocate of democracy and liberal market-economy, has created a unique opportunity to develop new legal and political approaches to the problems posed by the secessionist movement. Despite such claims to the right of secession is reluctant to be allowed under the current international law, there are still many successful recognized secession cases in the recent two decades. Most democratic states in the West are holding an open attitude toward selfdetermination or secessionism. Other sovereign states with communist background in the past still insist on traditional sovereignty and resort to force to cope with secessionism. For example, in the case of Chechnya Republic, the heavy price paid by Russia and Chechnya is borne by the two governments and their peoples. There are still, so far, no acceptable political or legal regulations in the international community to balance and mediate the conflict between sovereign states and secessionists. For the United Nations, to maintain international peace and common development are perhaps to be the key issue in dealing with those conflicts. Taiwan can not be too optimistic about its own self-determination campaign or the future of cross-strait conflict. If Taiwan pursues selfdetermination without international support, it will be criticized for ignoring international responsibility as it endangers the security of the region. |
| Relation: | 問題與研究, 45(5), 61-90
Issues & studies |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 45-5-3.pdf | | 6123Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 344 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
