English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51776663      Online Users : 425
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94917


    Title: 台灣銀行業生產力與效率分析
    The Productivity and Efficiency Analysis of Banking Industry in Taiwan
    Authors: 洪琬婷
    Contributors: 李文福
    洪琬婷
    Keywords: 產出組合效果
    生產力
    效率
    銀行
    Malmquist TFP index
    output-mix effect
    productivity
    efficiency
    bank
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 13:27:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自1970年代起,政府鬆綁了許多金融管制與政策限制,國內的銀行產業環境有所改變,再加上逐漸自由化與國際化的趨勢,導致國內的銀行業日益競爭,在如此競爭的環境中,銀行要生存的關鍵在於本身的經營績效是否禁得起市場考驗。
    本文有鑑於銀行經營績效的重要性,採用Balk﹝2001﹞定義將總要素生產力變動分解為技術改變、純技術效率改變,規模效率改變及產出組合效果來進行分析。以本國53家一般銀行,選取1997-2005年共9年資料進行分析,並以不同面向進一步探討銀行生產力差異,最後以營運績效管理矩陣討論哪些銀行具有競爭優勢及發展的潛力。
    本研究主要實證結果如下:
    1、從整體銀行產業各年度生產力來看,整體銀行的經營效率在觀察期間的前半段是呈現退步,但後半段則是呈現成長的反方向變動;至於規模效率與產出組合效果方面則幾乎呈現退步;而技術面則與效率變動恰巧呈現反方向狀態,可見對整體銀行產業來說,規模效率的提昇及產出組合的最適選擇仍有相當大的努力空間。
    2、以外資持股比例的面向來看,外資持股比例較高的銀行其生產力並未較外資持股比例較低的銀行生產力高。以公、民營銀行面向來探討,公營銀行的總要素生產力變動較民營銀行的生產力變動高。加入金控後對於技術變動有所提升,但就整體生產力來看加入前後並無顯著差異。
    3、以營運績效管理矩陣來分析銀行廠商的表現可知,最多銀行廠商落在象限Ⅵ(TFPC<1,0.75<TE<0.9),佔所有廠商家數的比率為26.3%,而落於第Ⅰ象限(TFPC>1,TE>0.9)的銀行所佔的比率為14.3%。我們可以看到以縱軸為劃分基準來看,分佈於跨期生產力變動表現不佳的第ⅡⅣ及Ⅵ象限(TFPC<1)的銀行數目佔銀行總家數高達71.5%,顯示對大部分的銀行來說,都不具長期的發展潛力。
    In accordance with the policy of economic liberalization and internationalization, the Taiwan government released the banking industry from lots of financial regulations since 1970. The deregulation has exerted significant structural changes of financial institutions and imposed competitive pressure on the operation of banking industry. It follows that promoting efficiency and productivity of banking are the key factors for the banks to survive in the keen competitive environment.

    This study investigated the productivity and efficiency issues and decomposed total factor productivity change (TFPC) into technical change (TC), pure technical efficiency change (PTE), scale efficiency change (SEC) and output mix effect (OME) following Balk (2001). Then we proceeded to apply DEA method to estimate and analyze the productivity growth of the 53 sample banks in 1997-2005. The study also constructed an operational performance management matrix to classify and discuss the banks’ competitive advantage and the strategy of future development.

    The major empirical results were as follows:

    1.Operational efficiency of whole banking industry showed a decline tendency in the anterior half of observation period, but the posterior half presented the reverse direction change. The SEC and the OME were declining. The TC presented an increase tendency in the anterior half of observation period, but the posterior half presented the reverse direction change. Therefore, it indicates there are a lot of spaces for the industry to improve its performance.

    2.The banks with a higher proportion of foreign shareholdings didn’t have higher TFPC compared to those with lower proportion of foreign shareholdings. The TFPC of the publicly-owned banks was higher than the private banks. We also found that there were no difference in the operation efficiency before and after banks become the subsidiary banks of financial holding corporations.

    3.Using operational performance management matrix to classify and discuss banks’ performance, we found that 26.3% of the total banks belong to quadrant Ⅵ (TFPC<1,0.75<TE<0.9). 14.3% of banks belong to quadrantⅠ(TFPC>1,TE>0.9). The banks which located on quadrants Ⅱ, Ⅳ and Ⅵ (TFPC<1) account for 71.5%, which indicates that most of banks lose their long-run competitiveness.
    Reference: 一、中文部份

    王凱平(2004),「銀行產業經營效率與生產力分析」,國立政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文
    王克陸,彭雅惠,陳美燁(2007),「台灣金控子銀行經營績效之評估─使用DEA方法」,科技管理學科,第12卷,第2期,1-28
    林炳文(2001),「台灣地區商業銀行合併之效率分析」,風險管理學報,第3卷,第1期,1-21
    林炳文(2002),「台灣地區商業銀行合併效率性之分析:資料包絡分析法的應用」,台灣管理學刊,第1卷,第2期,341-355
    林銘鈺(2003),「台灣地區公營銀行民營化經營效率之研究─DEA方法之應用」,國立成功大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文
    柯慈儀(2001),「台灣地區商業銀行無效率因素之分析」,東吳大學經濟研究所碩士論文
    徐清俊、黃俊誠(2005) ,「台灣納入金控公司之14家銀行經營績效分析」,台灣銀行季刊,第56卷,第1期,27-37
    張文毓(2001),「我國銀行業經營效率性之比較研究-公營銀行vs.民營銀行」,台灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文
    陳碧綉(1995),「台灣地區本國銀行成本邊界函數之分析」,東吳經濟商學學報,第16期,109-154
    陳昆仁(2002),「台灣地區本國銀行與外商銀行經營效率之評估」,東吳大學經濟研究所碩士論文
    陳盈秀(2003),「台灣地區銀行業經營效率─三階段法之應用」,淡江大學應用經濟研究所碩士論文
    黃志典、黃智遠(2004),「台灣地區銀行產業成本效率之實證研究─隨機邊界法之應用」,企銀季刊,第27卷,第3期,1-28
    葉彩蓮、陳澤義(1998),「台灣公民營銀行經營效率之比較:資料包絡分析法的應用」,東吳經濟商學學報,第22期,77-100
    詹維玲,劉景中(2006),「金融自由化後台灣銀行的效率及生產力」,經濟論文,第34卷,第2期,251-300
    鄭秀玲、周群新(1998),「調整風險後之銀行效率分析:台灣銀行業的實證研究」,經濟論文叢刊,第26卷,第3期,337-366

    二、英文部分
    Alhadeff, D.A. (1954), Monopoly and Competition in Banking, Berkeley: University of California Press
    Altunbas, Y., J. Goddard and P. Molyneux (1999), “Technical Change in Banking”, Economics Letters, 64, 215-221
    Aly, H.Y., R. Graabowski, C. Pasurka and N. Rangan (1990), “Technical, Scale and Allocative Efficiency in U.S. Banking: An Empirical Investigation”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 211-218
    Balk, B.M. (2001), “Scale Efficiency and Productivity Change”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15, 159-183
    Banker, R.D., A.Charnes and W.W. Cooper (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 30, 1078-1092
    Benston, G. J. (1965), “Branch Banking and Economics of Scale”, Journal of Finance, 20, 312-331
    Berg, S.A., F.R. Forsund and E.S. Jansen (1992), “Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth during the Deregulation of Norweigian Banking, 1980-89”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, 211-228
    Bhattacharyya, A., C.A.K. Lovell and P. Sahay (1997), “The Impact of Liberalization on the Productive Efficiency of Indian Commercial Banks”, European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 332-345
    Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen and W.E. Diewert (1982), “The Economis Theory of Index Number and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity”, Econometrica, 50, 1393-1414
    Casu, B., C. Girardone and P. Molyneux (2004), “Productivity Change in European Banking: A Comparison of Parametric and Non-parametric Approaches”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 28, 2521-2540
    Cavallo, L. and S.P.S. Rossi (2001), “Scale and Scope Economies in the European Banking System”, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 11, 515-531
    Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E.Rhodes (1978), “Measurement the Efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444
    Coelli, T., D.S.P. Rao and G.E. Battese (1998), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
    Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and W. F. Lee (2001), “Productivity and Technical Change: The Case of Taiwan”, Applied Economics, 33, 1911-1925
    Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang (1994), “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries”, American Economic Review, 84, 66-83
    Farrell, M.J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, CXX, Part3, 253-290
    Hancock, D. (1985), “The Financial Firm: Production with Monetary and Nonmonetary Goods”, Journal of Political Economt, 93, 859-880
    Miller, S.M. and A.G. Noulas (1996), “The Technical Efficiency of Large Bank Production”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 20, 495-509
    Resti, A. (1997), “Evaluating the Cost-Efficiency of the Italian Banking System: What Can Be Learned from the Joint Application of Parametric and Non-Parametric Techniques”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 21, 211-250
    Saha, A. and T.S. Ravisankar (2000), “Rating of Indian Commercial Banks: A DEA Approach”, European Journal of Operational Reasearch, 124, 187-203
    Sathye, M. (2001), “X-efficiency in Australian Banking: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 25, 613-630

    Sealey, C.W. and J.T. Lindley (1977), “Input, Outputs and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depositary Financail Institutions”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 1251-1266
    Shephard, R.W. (1970), Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    95258005
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095258005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2262View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback