 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 115406/146445 (79%)
Visitors : 55098895
Online Users : 74
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90785
|
| Title: | 社會資本（Social Capital）：概念、緣起及現況 |
| Other Titles: | On Social Capital: The Concept, Origins, and Research Trend |
| Authors: | 王中天
Wang, Jong-Tian |
| Keywords: | 社會資本;蘊含;自主性;社會結構;集體行動的問題
Social capital;embeddedness;autonomy;social structure;collective action problem |
| Date: | 2003-09 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-05-04 16:21:24 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 社會資本 ] 在近二十年來已躍然成為一個熱門的分析概念。然而，社會資本在學界受到的重視也對其概念的運作與理論的整合造成困擾。本文企圖從三個不同但卻有相關的角度來了解社會資本。首先，筆者嘗試匯集與解讀三位公認的社會資本理論家社會資本的闡述並歸納其共同點。其次，筆者從學術與時代背景來探索社會資本的源起。第三，藉由筆者對社會資本定義的蒐集與文獻整理，探討當前社會資本研究領域的特徵。本文的發現與論點可歸納如下 : 首先，社會資本是指所有蘊含在社會關係內的資源 ; 個體與總體的分析層次皆可使用之。其次，由對社會資本概念的源起之探索得知寫不是一個嶄新的概念，而是承繼傳統社會思想並呼應當代歷史的產物。再者，當前社會資本的研究文獻中存在兩派不同的研究焦點 : 其中一派是以社會學家為首，他們關注社會資本在理性個體行動者間的運作 ; 另一派則以政治學者為代表，他們重視社會資本的集體面向。兩派皆對吾人了解社會關係與社會行為有所貢獻，可是二者未來能否整合，前景並不明朗。
Social capital` has been a very popular analytical concept for the past two decades. However, the growing interest in social capital has also caused a problem regarding the appropriate use of the concept and its theoretical integration. This article intends to understand social capital from three different, but related aspects. First, the author tries to review three of the most commonly recognized theorists` ideas on social capital and summarize their similarities. Second, the origins of the concept is researched from both academic and historical background. Thrid, through a survey social capital definition and literature reviews, the author explores the characteristics of modern social capital research. The findings of the article can be summarized as follows. First, social capital is a resource embedded in social relations. It can be applied to both individual and aggregate levels of analysis. Second, social capital is not a brand new concept, but a product of both traditional social thought and historical development. Third, a theoretical divide exists in the study of social capital. On the one hand, sociologists see social capital operating among rational individuals; on the other hand, political scientists treat social capital as a collectively-owned resource. Both camps contribute to our understanding of social relations and behavior. However, the prospect of integration between the two camps is still not clear. |
| Relation: | 問題與研究42(5),139-163頁
Issues & studies |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 42,5,p139-163.pdf | | 2707Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 684 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
