English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51678363      Online Users : 644
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/90462
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90462


    Title: 應收帳款內部控制評估與審計程式規劃判斷之研究--審計人員之判斷行為
    Authors: 陳春宏
    Contributors: 杜榮瑞
    陳春宏
    Date: 1989
    Issue Date: 2016-05-04 14:22:50 (UTC+8)
    Reference: 參考書目
    中文部份:
    1.申佩芝,審計人員重要性判斷行為之研究──透視模型之應用,(台北:政大會計研究所碩士論文,民國77年6月)。
    2.余政光編印,BMDP使用手冊,(台北:松崗電腦圖書資料有限公司,民國77年1月初版)。
    3.杜榮瑞,"會計與人類資訊處理:理論與應用",會計研究月刊第39期,(民國77年12月),頁54-56。
    4.杜榮瑞,"審計實務的文化觀",會計研究月刊第42期刊,(民國78年3月),頁24-26。
    5.俞洪昭,重要性判斷行為之研究──透視模型之應用,(台北:政大會計研究所碩士論文,民國77年6月)。
    6.陳正待,我國會計師事務所審計人員重要性判斷行為之研究,(台北:政大會計研究所碩士論文,民國76年6月)。
    7.陳兆宏,"變異數分析下的統計值-w2之介紹"會計評論第22期,(政大會計研究所學會,民國76年12月),頁120-145。
    8.陳兆宏,審計人員內部控制判斷行為之研究一一透視模型之應用,(台北:政大會計研究所碩士論文,民國77年6月)。
    9.審計準則委員會,審計準則公報第1號,(台北:中華民國財務會計研究發展基金會,民國74年12月修訂)。
    10.嚴世傑譯,SPSS/PC+使用手冊,(台北:儒林圖書公司,民國76年4月修訂版)。

    二、英文部份:
    1.Aly, H. F., and J. I. Duboff, "Statistical vs. Judgmental Sampling: An Empirical Study of Auditing the Accounts Receivable of a Small Retail Store," The Accounting Review (January 1971), PP.119-128.
    *2.American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Statement on Auditing Standards No.1 (New York: AICPA, 1973).
    3.Ashton, R. H., "Art Experimental Study of Internal Control Judgment," Journal of Accounting Research(Spring 1974a), PP.143-157.
    4. ───, "Cue Utilization and Expert Judgments: A Comparison of Independent Auditors with Other Judges," Journal of Applied Psychology (August 1974b) .
    5. ───, Human Information Processing in Accounting, 1982, American Accounting Association.
    6. ───, and P. R. Brown, "Descriptive Modeling of Auditors` Internal Control Judgments: Replication and Extension," Journal of Accounting Research Spring 1980), PP.269-277.
    7. ───, and S. S. Krammer, "Students as Surrogates in Behavioral Accounting Research: Some Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1980), PP.1-15.
    *8.Brehmer, B., "Effects of Communication and Feedback on Cognitive Conflict," Scandinavian Journal of Psychology (Third Quarter 1971), PP.205-216.
    9.Cochran, W. G., and G. M. Cox, Experimental Designs (Wiley, 1957).
    10.Crosby, M. A., "Bayesian Statistics in Auditing: A Comparison of Probability Elicitation Techniques, "The Accounting Review (April 1981), PP.335-365.
    11.DeAngelo, L. E., "Auditor Size and Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics (December 1980), PP.183-199.
    12.Duh, R. R., "Auditors` Internal Control Evaluation : A Cross-Cultural Exploration," Unpublished Working Paper, School of Management National Taiwan University, (1989).
    13.Felix, W. L., Jr. and M. S. Niles, "Research in Internal Control Evaluation," Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Spring 1988), PP.43-60.
    14.Gaumnitz, B. R., T. R. Nunamaker, J. J. Surdick, and M. F. Thomas, "Auditor Consensus in Internal Control Evaluation and Audit Program Planning, "Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn 1982), PP.745-755.
    *15.Goldberg, L. R., "Simple Methods or Simple Processes? Some Research on Clinical Judgments," American Psychologist (July 1968), PP.483-496.
    *16.Hamilton, R. E., and W. F. Wright, "The Evaluation of Internal Controls Over Payroll," Unpublished Manuscript, Stanford University, 1977.
    17. ───, and ───, "Internal Control Judgments and Effects of Experience: Replications and Extensions," Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn 1982), PP.756-765.
    *18.Hammond, K. R., C. J. Hursch, and F. J. Todd, "Analyzing the Components of Clinical Inference,"Psychological Review (November 1964), PP.438-456.
    19.Hays, W. L., Statistics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973).
    20. ───, Statistics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1981).
    *21.Hofstede, G., "The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories," Journal of International Business Studies (Fall 1983), PP .75-89.
    22. Joyce, E. J., "Expert Judgment in Audit Program Planning," Studies on Human Information Processing in Accounting , Supplement to Journal of Accounting
    Research (1976), PP.20-26.
    23. ───, and G. C. Biddle, "Are Auditors` Judgments Sufficiently Regressive?" Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn 1981), PP.323-349.
    24. ───, and R. Libby, "Behavioral Studies of Audit Decision Making," Journal of Accounting Literature; Vol.1, (Spring 1982), PP.103-123.
    25.Kell, W. G., W. C. Boynton, and R. E. Ziegler, Modern Auditing, Third Editor, 1986.
    *26.Kinney, W. R., and B. A. Ritts, "Auditors` Sampling Behavior: An Empirical Study," Iowa Bureau of Business and Economic Research Working Paper Series, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 1973.
    27. ───, and W. C. Uecker, "Mitigating the Consequences of Anchoring in Auditor Judgments," The Accounting Review, Vol. LVII, Np.1, (January 1982),PP.55-69.
    28.Meigs, W. B., O. R. Whittington, and R. F. Meigs, Principles of Auditing, Eight Edition, Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1985.
    *29.Messier, W. F., Jr., "The Effect of Experience and Firm Type on Materiality / Disclosure Judgments," Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn 1983), PP.611-618.
    *30.Reckers, P. M. J., and M. E. Taylor, "Consistency in Auditors` Evaluations of Internal Accounting Controls," Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance (Fall 1979), PP.42-55.
    31.Tabor, R., "Internal Control Evaluations and Audit Program Revisions: Some Additional Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1983), PP.348-354.
    32.Trotman, K. T., P. W. Yetton, and I. R. Zimmer, "Individual and Group Judgments of Internal Control Systems," Journal of Accounting Research (Spring 1983), PP.286-292.
    *33.Tuker, L. R., "A Suggested Alternative Formulation in the Developments by Hursch, Hammond, and Hursch, and by Hammond, Hursch, and Todd," Psychological Review (November 1964), PP.528-530.
    34.Wright, A., "The Impact of CAP-Firm Size on Auditor Disclosure `Preferences," The Accounting Review(July 1983); `PP. 621-632.
    *表示作者為直接參閱。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002005778
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback