English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51815338      Online Users : 43
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89382


    Title: 公共組織理論研究方法論的反省:社會科學典範的途徑
    Authors: 張世杰
    Contributors: 吳瓊恩
    張世杰
    Date: 1992
    1991
    Issue Date: 2016-05-02 15:22:58 (UTC+8)
    Reference: 王道還編譯
    1989 科學革命的結構,台北:遠流出版事業有限公司。
    江天驥
    民國77年 當代西方科學哲學,台北:谷風出版社
    吳定
    民國74年 公共行政論叢,台北:天一圖書公司
    吳瓊恩
    民國78年 (a) 美國行政學研究的過去與未來」,`台北:美國月刊,第3卷,第10期,民國78年2 月
    (b)「行政學未來的發展」,台北:人事月刊,第8卷 第4期,民國78年4 月。
    (c)「美國社會科學新趨勢及其對公共政策研究之啟示」,台北:中國政治學會。
    (d)「從各學科典範變遷趨勢探討公共組織理論實證研究的限制及其突破的可能性」,台北:政治大學學報,第60期。
    民國79年 「台灣四十年來組織理性型模的批判及其未來改革方向(一九四九年──)」,光復後台灣地區發展經驗研討會,中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
    民國81 年 「公共行政教育的內涵與方向」,第四屆全國管理教育研討會,國立政治大學,中華民國管理科學學會。
    沈清松
    民國75年 解除世界魔咒-科技對文化之衝擊與展望,台北:時報文化出版企業有限公司。
    民國79年 人我交融-自我成熟與人際關係,台北:洪健全教育文化基金會附設書評書目出版社。
    李永熾
    1990 「技術在歷史中的演化」,台北:當代,第五十六期。
    李翠萍
    民國80年 「公共組織上的政治經濟學一從歐爾森、霍次曼、歐斯姆談起」,台北:中國行政,第五十期。
    何信全
    民國78年 「波柏點滴社會工程的哲學證據」,人文社會的哲學基礎研討會,政治大學哲學系
    林鍾沂
    1991 公共政策與批判理論,台北:遠流出版社事業股份有限公司。
    民國80年 「試論公共行政的意義、範團與研究途徑」紀念張金鑑教授八秩晉九誕辰行政學術研討會。
    林毓生
    民國71 年 「中國人文的重建」,台北:聯合月刊,第十四期。
    夏林清與鄭村棋編譯
    民國78 年 行動科學-在實踐中探討,台北:張老師出版社。
    高宣揚
    1991 年 哈柏瑪斯論,台北:遠流出版社事業股份有限公司。
    張潤書
    民國75年 行政學台北:三民書局股份有限公司。
    張家銘
    民國76年 社會學理論的歷史反思,台北:圓神出版社。
    陳文團
    1990 「理性與方法」,台北:台大哲學論評,第十三期。
    陳裕生「公共行政的新趨向-新公共行政的誕生」
    民國64年 中國行政,第二十四期。
    陳榮灼
    民國81 年 現代與後現代之間,台北:時報文化出版企業有限公司。
    陳曉林
    民國76年 學術巨人與理性困境,台北:時報文化出版企業有限公司。
    莊文瑞
    1987 「當代科學哲學的轉向-巴柏與孔恩的論辯」台北:當代,第十期。
    郭秋永
    民國77年 政治學方法論研究專集,台北:台灣商務印書館股份
    有限公司。
    項退結編譯
    民國65年 西洋哲學辭典,台北:國立編輯館。
    舒光
    民國76年 科學哲學導論,台北:水牛圖書出版事業有限公司。
    黃進興
    民國81年歷史主義與歷史理論,台北:允晨文化實業股份有限公司。
    黃瑞祺
    民國77年 批判理論與現代社會學,台北:巨流圖書公司。
    楊深坑
    民國77年 理論、詮釋與實踐-教育學方法論論文集(甲輯) ,台北:師大書苑有限公司。
    楊士毅
    民國80年 邏輯﹒民主﹒科學-方法論導讀,台北:書林出版有限公司。
    鄒應瑗譯
    民國78 年 巨觀思考的智慧,台北:中國生產力中心。
    廖仁義譯
    1991 法蘭克福學派,台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
    顏良恭
    民國80 年 「公共行政理論與實際的關係,實證論、詮釋學與批判理論的比較」,公共事務與國家發展學術研討會,財團法人民主文教基金會。
    羅永生
    民國77年「歷史科學的探索-馬克思的道路」畢浩明主編,社會學:界限與局限,台北:商務印書館。
    劉曉波
    民國79年 思想之謎與人類之夢-現代~當代之部,台北:風雲時代出版公司。

    Argyris, Chris. Resoning, Learning, and Action: Individual and Organizational. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983.
    Argyris, Chris. and Schon, Donald. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective Reading. Mass: Addison- Wesley, 1978.
    Argyris, Chris. Putnam, Robert. and Smith, Diana Mclain. Action Science. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1985.
    Bailey, Stephen K. "Objectives of the Theory of .Public Administration." In James Charlesworth, ed., pp. 128- 39. Theory and Practice in Public Administration: Scope, Objectives and Methods Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, October 1968.
    Bailey, Mary Timney. "Do Physicists Use Case Studies? Thoughts on Public Administration Research." Public Administration Review 52:1(1992):47-54.
    Baugh, Jr. Kenneth. The Methodology of Herbert Blumer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
    Bell, Daniel. "The End of Ideology in the West." In Chaim I. Waxman, ed., The End of the Ideology Debate. New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1968.
    Bellone, Carl, ed. Organization Theory and the New Public Administration. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980.
    Bennis, Warren G. Changing Organizations. New York: McGraw Hill , 1966.
    Benson, J. Kenneth. "Paradigm and Praxis in Organizational Analysis. " Research in Organizational Behavior, 5(1983): 33-56.
    Bernstein, Richard J. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978.
    Bernstein, Richard J. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Penn sylvania Press, 1983.
    Blaug, Mark. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge University Press, 1980.
    Blaug, Mark. "Kuhn Versus Lakatos, or Paradigms Versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics." In Gary Gutting, ed., pp.137-59. Paradigm & Revolution, Indiana: University of Notre
    Dame Press, 1980.
    Bleicher, Josef. Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and critique. London:Routedge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
    Blumer, Herbert. . "Forewood." In Bruyn, Severyn T. The Human Perspective in Sociology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
    Blumer, Herbert. Symbolic Interaction: Perspective and Method, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
    Bottomore, Tom. Sociology and Socialism. Wheatsheaf Books Li mited, 1984.
    Boland, Richard J., Jr. "Beyond the Objectivist and Subjecti vist and Subjectivist Learning to Read Accounting as Text." Accounting, Organizations and Society 14:5/6(1989):591-604.
    Brubacker, Rogers. The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1984.
    Buchanan, J.M. "Public goods and Public bads." In J.P. Grecine, ed., pp.51-72. Financing the Metropolis. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage, 1970
    Burrell, Gibson, and Morgan, Goreth. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann, 1979.
    Capra, Frujof The turning Point: Science, Society and The Rising
    Culture. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1982.
    Charlesworth, James, ed. Theory and Practice in Public Administration: Scope, Objectives and Methods. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, October 1968.
    Carton, Bayard L. and Harmon, Michael M. "Action Theory In Practice: Toward Theory Without Conspiracy." Public Administra tion Review 41(1981):535-41.
    Crenson, Matthew A. "Comment; Contract, Love, and Character Building." In Frank Marini, ed., pp. 83-89. Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Scran ton, Pa.: Chandler, 1971.
    Cooper, Phillip J. "Paradigms Changing Times, and Public Adminstration.” in Book Review, Public Administration Review 51: 2(1991):180-81.
    Crozier, M. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
    Dahl, Robert A.”The Science of Public Administration." Public Administration Review 7(1947):79- 88.
    Denhardt, Robert B. "Toward a Critical Theory of Public Organization."Public Administration Review 41(1981):628-35.
    Denhardt, Robert B. "Theories of Public Organization.: Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1984.
    Denhardt, Robert B. "Public Administration Theory: The State of the Discipline." In Naomi B. Lynn & Aaron Wildavsky eds., pp. 43-72. Public Administration: The State of the Discipl ine. New
    Jersey: Chatham House Publishers, Inc., 1990.
    Downs, A. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown, 1967.
    Fay, Brain. Social Theory and Political Practice. George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1975.
    Fesler, James W. "A Review." Journal of Politics 10:(February/1948):187- 89.
    Fesler, James W. "Public Administration and the Social Sciences : 1946-1960." In F. C. Mosher, ed., pp.97-141. American Public Administration: Past, Present, and Future. Ala.: University of Alabama Press, 1975.
    Fisher, Frank. Politics, Values, and Public Policy: The Problem of Methodology. Denver: Westview Press, 1980.
    Fisher, Frank. "Ideology and organization Theory." In Frank Fisher and Carmen Sirianni, eds., Critical Studies in Orga nization and Bureaucracy. Philadephia: Tempele University Press, 1984.
    Frederickson, H. George. "Toward a New Public Administration." In Frank Marini, pp.309-31. Toward a New Public Administr ation The Minnowbrook Perspective. Scranton, Pa. :Chandler, 1971.
    Forester, John. "Critical Theory and Planning Practice." In John Forester, ed., pp.202- 227. Critical Theory and Public Life. The MIT Press, 1985.
    Forester, John. Planning In the Face of Power. University of California Press, 1989.
    Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. New York: The Continuum Publishing Corporation, 1975.
    Geuss, Raymond. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas & the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
    Giddens, Anthony. Social Theory and Modern Sociology. California: Stanford University Press. 1987.
    Giddens, Anthony. The Consequences of Modernity. Polity Press, 1991.
    Gioia, Dennis A. and Pitre, Evelyn "Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building, "Academy of Management Review 15:4(1990)?: 584-602.
    Golembiewski Robert T. “’Maintenance’ and `Task` as Central Challenges in Public Administration." Public Administration Review 34(March/1974):168-175.
    Golembiewski, Robert T. Public Administration as a Developing Discipline, Part II. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1977.
    Golembiewski, Robert T. and Hilles, R. J. Toward the Responsive Organization: The Theory and Practice of Survey/Feedback. Salt Lake City: Brighton, 1979.
    Golembiewski, Robert T. and Eddy, W.B. Organization Develop ment in Public Administration: Organization Development Properties and Public Sector Features, Part 1. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1978a.
    Golembiewski, Robert T. Organization Development in Public Administration: Public Sector Applications of Organization Development Technology, Part 2. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1978b.
    Goodsell, C.T. The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic. Chatham, NJ:Chatham House, 1983.
    Gulick, Luther. "Scrence, Values, and Public Administration." In Papers on the Science of Administration." In Gulick, Luther and Urwick, L, eds., pp.189-95. New York: Institute of Public Administration, 1937.
    Habermas, Jurgen. Toward a Rational Society. Jeremy J. Shapiro, trans. Boston: Beacon Press, 1970.
    Habermas, Jurgen. Knowledge and Human Interests. Jeremy J. Shapiro, trans. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., 1972.
    Habermas, Jurgen. Communication and the Evoluation of Society. Thomas McCarthy, trans. Boston: Beacon Press, 1979.
    Habermas, Jurgen. The Theory of Communicative Action :. Reason and The Rationalization of society, part O. Thomas Ma Carthy, trans. Boston: Beacon press, 1984 .
    Hampel, Carl G. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
    Hanson, N.R. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
    Harmon, Michael M. Action Theory for Public Administration. New York: Longman, 1981.
    Harmon, Michael M. and Mayer, Richard T. Organization Theory for Public Administration. Little, Brown & Company, 1986.
    Harmon, Michael M. "Decision and Action as Contrasting Pers pectives in Organization Theory." Public Administration Review(March/April 1989):144-52.
    Hart, David K. "Social Justice, Equity, and the Public Administrator." Public administration Review 34:1(1974): 3-11.
    Hassard, J. "Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: A Case Study" Organization Studies 12:2(1991):275- 299.
    Hayagreeva Rao, M. V. and Pasmore, William A. "Knowledge and Interests in Organization Studies: A conflict of Inter pretations" Organization Studies 10:2(1989):225-239.
    Henry, Nicholas. Public Administration and Public Affairs, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Pre ntice-Hall, 1986.
    Hindess, Barry. Philosophy and Methodology in the Social Scrences. The Harvester Press, 1977.
    Hoy, Wayne K. and Miskel, Cecil G. Educational Administration: Theory Research and Practice, 3rd ed. New York: Random House , 1987.
    Hughes, John. The Philosophy of Social Research. Longman. 1985.
    Hummel, Ralph P. The Bureaucratic Experience, 3rd ed. New York: St. Martin`s Press, 1987.
    Jun, Jong S. Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
    Jackson, N. and Carter, P. "In Defence of Paradigm Incommensurability." Organization Studies 12:1(1991):109-27.
    Kirkhart, Larry. "Toward a Theory of Public Administration." In Frank Marini, ed., pp.127-64. Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook perspective. Scranron, Pa. Chandler. 1971.
    Kuhn. Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970a.
    Kuhn. Thomas S. "Logic of discovery or psychology of research? Reflections on my crities." In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds., pp.1-23, 231-78. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledges. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1970b.
    Kuhn. Thomas S. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.
    Laporte, Todd R. "The Revocery of Relevance in the Study of Public Organization." In Frank Marini, ed., pp.17-48. Toward a New Public Administration: The Minnowbrook Per pective. Scranton, Pa.: Chandler, 1971.
    Lovrich, Nicholas P. Jr. "Contending Paradigms in Public Administration A Sign of Crisis or Intellectual Vitality?" Administration & Society, 17:3 (1985):307-330.
    Machlup, Fritz ? Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences . New York: Academic Press, 1978.
    MacIntyre, Alasdair. "Epistemological Crises, Dramatic Narrative, and The Philosophy of Science." In Gary Gutting, ed., pp.54-74. Paradigm & Revolution. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980.
    Marini, Frank. "Introduction: A New Public Administration?" In Frank Marini, ed., pp.1-16. Toward a New Public Administra tion: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Scranton, Pa.: Chandler, 1971.
    Marsh, James G. and Simon, Herbert A. Organization. New York: Wiley, 1958.
    Masterman, Margaret. "The Nature of a Paradigm." In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds., pp.59-89. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1970.
    McCarthy, Thomas. The Critical Theory of Jurgen Habermas. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press, 1985.
    Morgan, Gareth. "Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization
    Theory." Administrative science Quarterly 25 (1980):605- 22.
    Morgan, Gareth. ed., Beyond Method. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1983.
    Morgan, Grareth. Images of Organization. Sage Publications, 1986.
    Morgan, Gareth. "Paradigm diversity in Organizational research." In John Hassare and Denis Pym eds., pp.13-29. The Theory and Philosophy of Organizations: Critical issues and new perspectives. London: Routledge, 1990.
    Moberga, D.W. "Are There Rival, Incommensurable Theories?" Philosophy of Science 46(1979):224-62.
    Newton-Smith, W.H. The Rationality of Science. Routledge & Kegan Paul PIc, 1981.
    Ostrom, Vicent. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. University, Ala: University of Alabama Press, 1973.
    Ostrom, Vinceut. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Aministration, rev. ed. University, Ala: University of alabama press,1974.
    Ostrom, Vincent. The Intellectual Crisis in amerIcan Public Administration, 2nd ed., University, Ala.: University of Alabama Press, 1989.
    Ostrom, Vincent and Ostrom, E. "Public Choice: A different approach to the study of public administration." Public Administration Review 37(1977):38-47.
    Perry, James L. "Strategies for Building Public Administration Theory. " In James L. Perry ed., pp.1-18. Research in Public Administration: A Research Annual, Volume 1. JAI Press Inc., 1991.
    Phillips, D.C. Philosophy, Science and Social Inquiry. Per gamon Press, 1987.
    Popper Karl R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1945.
    Popper, Karl R. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1963.
    Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1968.
    Popper, Karl R. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. rev. ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.
    Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.
    Pusey, Michael Jurgen Habermas. Tavistock Publications Limited, 1987.
    Ramos, Alberto G. "A Substantive Approach to Organizations: Epis`:"temological Grounds." In Carl Bellone, ed., pp.140-68. Organization Theory and the New Public Administration. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980.
    Reason, Peter and Rowan, John eds., Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research. John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
    Riley, Gresham. "Introduction." In Gresham Riley, ed., Values, Objectivity and the Social Sciences. Mass: Addison- Wesley Publishing Co.,1974.
    Ritzer, George. Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science. rev. ed., Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1980.
    Ritzer, George. Sociological Theory. New York: Alfred A. Knopt, 1983.
    Rossi, Ino. From the Sociology of symbols to the Sociology of Signs: Toward a Dialectical Sociology. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.
    Rourke, Francis E. Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. 3rd ed. Little, Brown and Company, 1984.
    Schon, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals In Action. New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, 1983.
    Simon, Herbert A. "The Proverbs of Administration." Public Administration Review, 6( 1946):53- 67.
    Simon, Herbert A. "A Comment on The Science of Public Administration." Public Administration Review, 7(1947):200-203.
    Simon, Herbert A. Administrative Behavior: A Study of DecisionMaking Process in Administrative Organization; 2nd ed. New York: Free Press, 1957a.
    Simon, Herbert A. Models of Man, New York: Wiley, 1957b.
    Smelser, N. Essays in Sociological Explanation, Englewood Cliff: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
    Steffy, Brian D. & Grimes, Andrew J. "A Critical Theory of Organization Science." Academy of Management Review, 11:2 (1986):322- 336.
    Stene, E.O. "An Approach to a Science of Administration." American Political Science Review, 34( 1940): 1124-1137.
    Stever, James A. The End of Public Administration: Problems of the Profession in the Post-Progressive Era, Dobbs Ferry, New York: Transnational Publish, 1988 .
    Stillman, R.J. II. "Professor Ostrom`s New Paradigm for American Public Administration-Adequate or Antique?" Midwest Review of Public Administration. 10(1976):179-192.
    Stillman, R.J. II. "The Changing Patterns of Public Administration Theory in American." In J.A. Uveges, Jr., ed., Public Administration: History and Theory In Contemporary Perspective, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982.
    Stillman, Richard J. II. Preface to Public Administration: A Search for Themes and Direction, New York: ST. Martin`s Press, 1991.
    Thayer. Frederick C. "Organization Theory as Epistemology." In Carl Bellone, ed., pp.113- 39. Organization Theory and the New Public Administration. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1980.
    Toulmin, S.E. "Does the distinction between normal and revolu tionary Science hold water?" In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, eds., pp. 39-47. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York:Cambridge University Press, 1970.
    Tullock, G. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington, D.C.:Public Affairs Press, 1965.
    Uveges, Joseph A. Jr. and Keller, Lawrence F. "The First One Hundred Years of American Public Administration: The Study and Practice of Public Management in American Life." In Jack Robin, W. Bartley Hildreth and Gerald J.Miller, eds., .pp.1-42. Handbood of Public Administration. Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1988.
    Waldo, D. The Administrative State, Ronald Press, New York, 1948.
    Waldo, D. "Development of Theory of Democratic Administration." American Political Science Review, 46(1952):81-103.
    Waldo, D. Perspectives on Administration. University of Alabama Press, University Alabama, 1956.
    Waldo, D. The Study of Public Administration. Doubleday, New York , 1955.
    Waldo, D. "The Administrative State Revisited," Public Administra tion Review, 25( 1965):5-30.
    Waldo, D. "Scope of the Theory of Public Administration," In J. F. Charlesworth, ed., Theory and Practice of Public Administration, Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science , 1968.
    Waldo, D. "Organization Theory: Revisiting the Elephant", Public administration Review. 38:6(1978):589-597.
    Waldo, D. The Enterprise of Public Administration: A Summary View , Chandler & Sharp Publishers, Inc. p 1981.
    Waldo, D. "The Perdurability of the Politics-Administration Dichotomy: Woodrow Wilson and the Identity Crisis in Public Administration." In Jack Rabin & James S. Bowman ed., Politics and Administration: ? Woodrow Wison and American Public Administration, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1984.
    Wamsley, G., and Zald, M. "The Political Economy of Public Organization", Public Administration Review, 33(1973):62-73.
    Warren, R.O. Government in Metropolitan Regions: A Reapproisal of Fractionated Political Organization. Davis, CA: Institute of Government Affairs, University of California, 1966.
    Weber, Max. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, trans. and ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 1946.
    Weber, Max. The Methodology of the Social Science. Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch, trans. and ed., New York: Free Press, 1949.
    Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Talcott Parsons, trans., New York:Scribner`s, ? 1958.
    Wellmer, A. Critical Theory of Society. New York: Herder & Herder, 1971.
    White, Jay D. "On the Growth of Knowledge in Public Administration. “ Public Administration Review, (January/February 1986):15-24
    White, Jay D. "Images of Administrative Reason and Rationality: The Recovery of Practical Discourse”, In H.D. Kass & B.L. Catron,eds., pp.132-50. Images and Indentities in Public Administration,Sage Publication, 1990.
    White, Orion F. and McSwain, Cynthia J. "The Phoenix Project: Rasing a New Image of Public Administration from the Ashes of the Past”. Administration & Society, 22:1(1990):3- 38. -202-
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    公共行政學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004392
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2368View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback