政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/87376

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/87376

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 52833590 Online Users : 606

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Department of Land Economics > Theses > Item 140.119/87376

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87376

Title:	發展許可協商制度之研究
Authors:	洪維廷 Hong, Wei Ting
Contributors:	邊泰明 Bian, Tai-Ming 洪維廷 Hong, Wei Ting
Keywords:	發展許可協商衝突管理交易成本賽局理論
Date:	1996
Issue Date:	2016-04-28 13:33:04 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	隨著都市的發展，經濟的成長，於台灣地區實行多年的土地使用分區管制制度，已經無法符合時代的需求。新訂的「國土綜合開發計畫法」草案中明訂全面實施發展許可制度，然而在發展許可制下，政府及開發者會在利益及價值觀上產生衝突，因此必須要以衝突管理的方式加以處理，衝突管理中最重要最重要的策略之一便是協商，本文嘗試以交易成本的理念找出降低交易成本的可行機制，並以賽局理論分析協商的過程及結果，最後建立一套可行的發展許可協商制度。
Reference:	英文部分 1.Admati,A.R.& Perry,M.( 1987),Strategy Delay in Bargaining,Review of Economic Studies ,pp.333-356 2.Alder,J.( 1990),Planning Af:,JTeements and Planning Powers,Journal of Plmming and Envirolllnent Law,pp.880-889 3.Amy,D.J. (1987) ,The Politics of Environmental Mediation,Columbia University Press. 4.Asami, Y. and Teraki,A.(1990),On Sequential Negotiation Procedures Optimal Negotiation Orders and Land Prices,Regional Science and Urban Economics,20,pp.537-556 5 .Asami, Y.( 1988),A Game-theoretic Approach to the Division of Profits from Economic Land Deveiopment,Regional Science and Urban Economics,18,pp.233-246 6.Batty,S.E.(l977),Game-theoretic Approaches to Urban Planning and Design,Environment and Planning B,4,pp.211-239 7.Binmore,K. and Dasgupta,P. (1987) , The Economics of Bargaining,Blackwell 8.Bowers,J. (1992) ,The Economics of Planning Gain :A Re- Appraisal, Urban Studies ,29,pp .1329-1339 9.Bllchanan,J.M. (1987) ,Rights,Efficiency & Exchange:The Irrelevance of Transaction Cost,Econornics:Between Predictive Science and Moral Philosophy,Texas A & M University Press 10.Bunnell,G.(1995),Planning Gain in Theory and Practice,Progress in Planning,44,pp.I-113 11.Carpenter,S.L & Kennedy,W.J.D. (1988) ,Managing Public Displltes,Jossey Bass Publishers 12.Chatterjee,K.& Samuelson,L.(1988),Bargaining under Two-Sided Incomplete Information:The Unrestricted Offers Cases,Operatiol1s Resemch,36,pp.605-618 13 .Cheung,S.N.S. ( (990) ,On the New Institutional Economics ill Lars Werin & Hans Wijbander ed. Contract Economics,.Balcbwell 14.Cheung,S.N.S. (1983) ,The Contractual Nature of the Firm,Journal of Law & Ecollomics,26,pp.1-21 15 .Coase,R.H. (1960) ,The Problem of Social Cost,1oumal of Law & Ecollomics,3,pp.I-44 16.Coase,R.H. (1937) ,The Nature of the Firm,Econometrica 4(3),pp.383-405 17.Cramton,P.C.(1992),Strategic Delay with Two-Sided Unceltainty, Working Paper36, Yale School of Organization and Managemel1t 18.Cullingworth,J.B. (1993) ,The Political Culture of Planl1ing ,Routledge 19.Dahlman,C.J. (1979) ,The Problem of Extemality,1011rnal of Law & Economics,22,pp.141-162 20 .Davis,R.F.(1985),Crafting Enforceable Development Agreement,Urban Land,pp.34-35 21.Demsetz,H . (1967) ,Toward a Theory of Property Rights,American Economic Review,57 ,pp.347 -359 22.Demsetz,H. (1964) ,The Exchange & Enforcement of Property Right,1 oumal of Law & Economics,6,pp.31-46 23 .Dorius,N.( 1993),Land Use Negotiation:Reducing Conflict and Creating Wanted Land Use,APA,50,pp.lOl-106 24.Dotson,A.B.(1989),The Planner as Dispute Resolver:Concepts and Materials,B lackwell 25 .Dresher,A.(1961 ),Contribl1tion to the Theory of Games Vol. II,Princeton University Press. 26.Eckmt,\\V.( 1985),011 the Land Assembly Problem,1oull1al of Urban Economics, 18,pp.364-3 78 27 .Fell1andes,B .A.( I 987),Negotiated Approaches to Planning, Unpub. PHD of Urban Design and Plmming,University of Washington 28.Fordham,R. (1993) ,Plalming Gain in Ten Dimensions,1oumal of Planning & Environment Law,pp.719-731 29.Forester,1.(l987),Pianning in the Face of Conflict:Negotiation and Mediation Strategies in Local Land Use Reguiation,APA,53,pp.303- 315 30.Fudenberg,D. and 1. Tirole (1991 ),Game Theory,MIT Press 31.Fudenberg,D.& 1. Tiroie (1983),Subgame-Pelfect Equilibrium of Finite and Infinite-Horizon Games,Joumai of Economic Theory,31 ,pp.251-268 32.Furubotn,E.G.& Pejovich,S.(1972),Property Rights and Economic Theory:A Survey of Recent Literahlre,1 Journal of Economic Literature,pp.1137 -1162 33 .Gresch,et al (1985),Managing Spatial Conflict The Planning System in Switzerland,Progress in Plmming,23(3),pp.l-105 34.Harsanyi,J.C.(1977),Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Sihlations,Cambridge University Press 35 .Hawke,J.N.(1981 ),Planning Agreement in Practice,Journal of Planning and Environment Law,pp.5-14 pp.86-97 36.Henry,D.(1984),Plalming by AgreementA Local Survey,Joulllal of Plalming and EnvirolUnent Law,pp.395-400 37 .Hoch,C.(1990),Power,Plalming and Conflict,The Joumal of Architechlral and Planning Research,7( 4),pp.271-283 38JolU1son,EJ. (1994) ,Development Agreements-Analysis Colorado Case Studies CommentraY,Rocky rvrauntain Land Use Institute 39Johnson,R.A. ( 1993) ,Neogatiation Basics:Concepts Skills & Exercises,Sage Publisher 40Jowell,J.( 1977),Bargaining in Development Control,Journal of Planning and Environment Law,pp.414-433 41.KelUlan,J. (1993) ,Bargaining with Private Information , Journal of Economics Literature,31 ,pp.45-1 04 42 .Keogh,G. & Evans,A.W. (1992) ,The Private & Social Costs of PlalU1ing Delay, Urban Studies 29, pp.687 -699 43 .Lichfield,N.(I 992),From Planning Gain to Community Benefit,Jouural of Planning and Environment Law,pp.1103-1118 44 .Michael,L. ( 1985) ,Urban Plmming.Sage Publisher 45.Milli1ery,J.R. (1985) ,Conflict Management in Urban Planl1ing,Gower Publishing Co. 46.Mlllwada,M.P.(1992),Active PaLiicipants or Passive Observers,Urban Stlldies,29(1 ),pp.89-97 47 .Nash,J.F.(1953),Two Person Cooperative Games,Econometrica,21,pp.128-140 48 .Nash,J .F.( 1950),The Bargaining Problem,Econometrica, 18,pp.155-162 49 .0sborne , M .1. and Rubinstein,A. (1990), Bargaining and Markets,Academic Press 50 .Polinsky,A.M.(1974),Economic Analysis as a Potential Deffective Procillct:A Buyers Guide to Posner`s Economic Analysis of Laws,Harvard Law Review,87,pp .1655-1681 51.Rasmllsen,E.(1994),Games and Infonnatiol1,Blackwell 52 .Redman,M.(l991 ),PlaLU1ing Gain and Obiligation, Journal of Planning and Environment Law,pp.203-218 53.Ronney,A.(197l ),Goveming:A Brief Introduction to Political Sciellce,Holt.Rinehmi and Winston 54.Rose,A.E. ( 1985) ,Game-Theoretic Models of Bargainillg ,Ccllnbridge University Press. 55.Rubinstein, A. (1982) , Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model,Econometrica,50,pp .97-109 56.Rllbinstein,A. and Wolinsky,A. (1985),Equilibrum ill a Market with Sequential Bargaining,Econometrica,53,pp .1133-1l50 57.Rllbinstein,A. "( 1987 ) ,A Sequential Strate6~c Theory of Bargaining,in T.F. Hewley ed. Advances in Economics Theory ,Cambridge University Press,pp .197 -224 58.Rubinstein ,A. (1985) , A Bargaining Model with Incomplete Infon11atoin about time Preference,Econometrica,53,pp.l151-1172 59 .Samueison,P.(1957),An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money,Journal of Political Economy,66,pp.467-482 60 .Schelling,T.(1963),The Strategy of Conflict,Cambridge University Press. 61 .Scimecca,J .A.( 1987),Conflict Resolution:the Basis for Social Control or Social Change,Conflict Management and Problem Soiving,Demis,J .D. ed.,New York University Press. 62,Simmie,J.M .(1985),Citizens in Conflict:A Sociology of Town Planning 63 .Smith,B.( I 988),California Development Agreements and British Planning Abrreements,Town Planning Review,59,pp.277-287 64.Stahl,I.(1972),Bargail1ing TheolY,Stockholm School of Economics 65 .Strange, W. C.( 199 5),Information,Hoidouts and Land Assembly, Journal of Urban Ecollomics,38,pp.317-332 66.Susskind,L. and McCrearY,S.(l985 ),Tec\\U1iques for Reducing Costal Resource Management Dispute Through Negotiation,APA,51 ,pp.365-375 67.Susskind,L. & Ozawa,C. ( 1983) ,Mediated Negotiation in the Public Sector,American Behavioral Scientist,2 7,pp .255-279 68.SLltton,J. (1986) ,Non-Cooperative Bargaining Theory :An IntrodLlctiol1,Review of Economics Studies,53,pp.709-724 69 .Telling,M. & Duxbury R.M. (1993) ,Planning Law & Procedure,Buttenvorths 70 .Wakeford,R. (1990) ,American Development Control,HMSO London 71 . Ward,A.J. and Solicitor,LL. B.(l982),Planning Bargaining: Where Do We Stand,Jollrnal of PlalU1ing and Environment,pp.74-84 72.Ward,A.J. (1980) ,Planning Bargaining :The Pros & Cons:or How Much Can the System Stand, J01l1l1al of Planning & Envirol1lnent Law,pp.631-637 73.Wileshaw,D.G. ( 1984) ,Planning Gain :A Theoretical Note,Urban Studies,21,pp.183-187 74. Young,O .R.(1971 ),Bargaining-Formal Theories of Negotiation, University of Illinos Press 中文部份 1.Coase ,R.H 原著，市場、廠商與法律，遠流出版社譯，民國八十四年 2.Coser ,A . L 原著，社會衝突的功能，桂冠圖書，民國八十年 3 王榮愷,負面性公共設施空間銜突之研究一以變電所用地為例，逢甲部市計劃系學士論文，民國七十九年六月 4 . 台大城鄉所，聯合開發權益分配與權利變換之研究，民國八十一年十月 5 行政院經建會，國土綜合開發研討會會議記錄，民國八十四年二月 6 吳文華，讓步方式與談判結果之關係,工業技術學院工業管理研究所碩士論文，民國七十六年六月 7 吳道生，賽局理論在公共工程合約授與行為之應用，台大土木，研究所碩士論文，民國八十二年五月 8 李麗霞，政策過程民眾參與之角色-以杜邦事件為個案分析，中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文，民國七十六年六月 9 汪銘生，黃國良，台灣地區環境紛爭的特性與其管理機制，經濟部國營事業環境紛爭處理與社區管理研究班講義，民國八十二年 10 林建元，開發許可制之改進及影響費課徵方式之研究，民國八十二年六月 12 林建元，黃萬翔，藍汀山，地方政府山坡地問授審查作業之改進方式，都市與計劃第二十一期第二卷，第233 頁-第254 頁 13 林森田，土地開發許可制之研究，行政院住宅及都市發展處，民國八十二年五月 14 林森田，土地開發許可制之研究一英國1990 城鄉計劃法，民國八十一年六月 15 政大地政研究所，權利變換實施辦法草案之研究，民國八十四年日月 16 . 政大地政研究所，台北市實施開發許可制度及規範，民國八十三年六月 17. 施俊吉，多元談判罪局的均衡，人文及社會科學集刊第三冊第一卷，第191 頁-第213頁 18 凌韻生，台灣地區實施開勞許可制時規劃主管機關組織變革之研究，成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文，民國八十一年六月 19 徐忠賢，開發許可制條件交換之研究一以京華開發案為例，中與大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文，民國八十一年六月 20 張金鑑，行政學典範，中國行政學會，民國六十年 21 張忠堂，公共政策制定過程衝突之研究一杜邦設廠爭議之個案分析，政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，民國七十七年六月 22 許秉翔，污染性工業區空間衝突管理之研究，淡江大學建築研究所碩士論文，民國八十三年六月 23 陳俊潔，都市計劃衝突解決之研究，台大城鄉研究所碩士論文民國八十四年 24. 陳俊龍，私有財產與外部性問題，茂昌書局，民國七十九年 25 陳娟娟，台灣地區山坡地開發許可制之研究，政大地政研究所碩士論文，民國八十三年一月 26. 陳順財，協商計劃對協商結果影響之研究，工業技術學院工業管理研究所碩士論文，民國七十六年六月 27 曾盛恕，公共決策與衝突管理一以高雄市覆鼎金垃圾焚化場場址選擇為例，中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國七十八年六月 28 曾繁廣，英國規劃許可制中規劃利益應用在台灣土地使用變更公平問題之研究，成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文，民國八十二年六月 29 黃建勛，浮動開發方式之研究一以南二高交流道特定區為例，政大地政研究所碩士論文，民國八十三年六月 30. 新台灣投及文教基金會，跨世紀台灣運輸與區域發展研討會論文集，民國八十三年十二月 31 熊宋元，市場之尺和心中之尺一論釋寇所定理和布坎南對寇斯定涅的質疑，經濟論文第二十一志第二期，第331 頁-第356 頁 32 劉必榮，談判，時報出版社，民國八十二年 33 鄭傑仁，台灣地區都市計劃銜突問題之研究以草嶺風景特定區計劃為例，逢甲建築及都市計劃研究所碩士論文，民國八十一年一月 34 蕭丁偉，契約選擇與交易成本:引證自台灣清朝宜蘭的水利契約，清大、經濟研究所碩士論文，民國八十二年六月 35 蕭辰寰，談判的迎論與實務:中美著作權系列談判個案研析，台大政治研究所碩士論文，民國八十年七月 36 . 謝淑貞，賽局理論，雙葉書廊，民國八十四年七月 37 謝潮儀，計量方法與都市土地使用模型，茂榮圖書，民國七十二年十一月 38 邊泰明，土地使用變更利益回銷對土地開發公平與效率的影響，民國八十三年四月 39. 邊泰明，高速公路沿線交流道整體開發可行性之研究，交通部國工局，民國八十二年十一月
Description:	碩士國立政治大學地政學系
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002910
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Land Economics] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
index.html	0Kb	HTML2	317	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback