Reference: | 《大美百科全書》 (1990),第12冊,106-112頁。台北:光復書局。
《簡明大英百科全書》 (1988),第8冊,67-68,74-77頁。台北:中華書局。
朱元鴻 (1998):
〈告別式已結束:我們活在不同的世界嗎?-紀念孔恩〉,《台灣社會學研究》,2:123-172。
李學勇 譯 (1988):《族群遺傳學與生物演化》。台北:國立編譯館。
李國偉 (1998.7.12):〈記者創造癌症救星,科學新聞也變八卦〉,《新新聞》,592:82-83。
林崇熙 (1998a):〈常態科學的政治經濟學〉,《當代》,132:46-61。
------ (1998b):〈從革命到被革命-科學家何以不願科學研究來研究科學〉,《當代》,126:18-33。
周成功 (1996):〈序:一場追獵致病基因的聖戰〉,《基因聖戰》。台北:天下文化。
------ (1997):〈導讀:人類基因組解讀計劃〉,《DNA的語言》。台北:天下文化。
科學月刊 (1990):〈科學與傳播專輯〉,《科學月刊》,21(8):601-624。
洪漢鼎 (1992):《語言學的轉向》。台北:遠流。
胡湘玲 (1994):《科技專家與社會溝通-台灣核四爭議13年的科學文化簡史》。清大歷史所科學史組碩士論文。
迷 走 (1998):〈怪物、女人與生物科技-評「異形4:浴火重生」〉,《醫望》,25:81-88。
翁秀琪 (1998):〈批判語言學、在地權力觀和新聞文本分析〉,《新聞學研究》,57:97-126。
孫曼蘋 (1976):《我國報紙科學新聞的正確性研究》。政大新聞所碩士論文。
陳信行 (1997):〈被人類建構出的真理-窺視「科學戰爭」的熱鬧與門道〉,《破週報》,97/4/17、97/5/1、97/5/16。
莫名 (1999.4.21):〈請問曹院士:這樣做,對嗎?-對曹安邦院士所謂的「研發抗癌新藥成功的質疑」〉,《新新聞週報》,633:106-107。
張瓊方 (1997年8月):〈第四代醫學革命-基因治療〉,《光華》,106-114。
國立編譯館 譯 (1988):《DNA世紀之回顧-遺傳物質構造及機能的研究發展史》。台北:徐氏基金會。
國家科學委員會 (1998):《行政院國家科學委員會 86年年報》,1-5頁。
馮建三 (1995):〈科技新聞是意識型態嗎?〉,《新聞學研究》,50:41-59。
傅大為 (1992):〈「政治性」的科學哲學如何可能?〉,《異時空裡的知識追逐-科學史與科學哲學論文集》,157-211。台北:東大。
------ (1998):〈「兩種文化」的迷惑與終結〉,《當代》,132:34-41。
潘柏滔 (1997):《遺傳工程與人的未來》。台北:雅歌。
謝瀛春 (1991):《科學新聞的傳播》。台北:黎明。
韓尚平 (1993):〈美國及英國科技報導及科學傳播對我國的啟示〉,《第二屆中華民國傑出新聞人員研究獎:得獎人研習考察報告》,11-47。台北:中華民國新聞評議會。
Bazerman, C. (1983). Scientific writing as a social act:A review of the literature of the sociology of science. In P. V. Anderson et al. (Eds.) (1983). New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication:Research, Theory, Practice, 156-184. New York:Baywood Publishing Company.
------ (1998). Emerging perspectives on many dimensions of scientific discourse. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (Eds.) (1998). Reading Science:Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, 15-28. London & New York:Routledge.
Berger, Arthur A. (1997). Narratives in Popular Culture, Media, and Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi:SAGE.
Berger, P. L. & T. Luckmann (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. 鄒理民 譯(1994):《知識社會學:社會實體的建構》。台北:巨流。
Bird, S. E. & R.W. Dardenne (1988). Myth chronicle, and story:Exploring the narrative qualities of news. In J. W. Carey (ed.) (1988). Media, Myths, and Narratives:Television and the Press. 47-86. Newbury Park, Beverly Hill, London, New Delhi:SAGE.
Bishop, J. E. & M. Waldholz. (1990). Genome:The Story of the Most Astonishing Scientific Adventure of Our Time-The Attempt to Map All the Genes in the Human Body. 楊玉齡 譯 (1996):《基因聖戰:擺脫遺傳的宿命》。台北:天下文化。
Brooks, B. S. et al.. News Reporting and Writing. 李利國 黃淑敏 譯 (1995):《當代新聞採訪與寫作》。台北:周知文化。
Burkett, W. (1986). News Reporting:Science, Medicine and High Technology. The Iowa State University Press.
Dornan, C. (1990). Some problems in conceptualizing the issue of "science and media", Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(1):48-71.
Dunwoody, S. (1986). The scientist as source. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986). Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News, 3-16. New York:Free Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London, New York, Sydney, Auckland:Edward Arnold.
Flatow, I. et al. (1986). What makes a good science story?-Panel discussion with Ira Flatow, Deniens S. O`Leary, Joann E. Rodgers, Stephen H. Schneider, and roger J. Trotter. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986). Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News, 103-115. New York:Free Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York:Pentheon Books.
Foss, S. K. (1995). Metaphoric criticism, Rhetorical Criticism:Exploration & Practice, 2nd Edition. Waveland Press.
Friedman, S. M. (1986). The journalist`s world. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986). Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News, 17-41. New York:Free Press.
Friedman, S. M., S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986).
Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News. New York:Free Press.
Gannon, R. (1991) Introduction, In R. Gannon (Ed.) (1991). Best Science Writing:Readings and Insights. Phoenix:Oryx Press
Gilbert, G. N. & M. Mulkay (1984). Opening Pandora`s Box:A Sociological Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Goodwell, R. (1986). How to kill a controversy:The case of recombinant DNA. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.) (1986). Scientists and Journalists:Reporting Science as News, 170-181. New York:Free Press
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Functions of language, Language, Context, and Text, 15-28.
Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin (1993). Writing Science:Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh Press.
Harre, R. (1994). Some narrative conventions of scientific discourse. In C. Nash (Ed.). (1994). Narrative in Culture:The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy, and Literature, 2nd Edition, 81-101. London & New York:Routledge.
Holmes, F. L. (1991). Argument and narrative in scientific writing. In Peter Dear (ed.) (1991). The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument:Historical Studies, 164-181. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jarvie, I. C. (1990). Media representation and philosophical representations of science, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(1):72-79.
Krieghbaum, H.(1967). Science and Mass Media. 謝瀛春 譯 (1994):《科學與大眾媒介》。台北:遠流。
Kuhn, T. S.. ([1962],1972)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 程樹德 傅大為 王道還 錢永德 譯 (1994):《科學革命的結構》。台北:遠流。
------ (1993). Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (ed.) (1993). Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Edition, 533-542. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago & London:University of Chicago Press.
Latour,B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
Latour,B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills:SAGE.
Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Communication and the Social Representation of Scientific Knowledge , Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7(1):1-10.
Martin J. R. (1998). Discourse of science:Recontextualisation, genesis, intertextuality and hegemony. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (Eds.) (1998). Reading Science:Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, 3-14. London & New York:Routledge.
Martin, J. R. & Robert Veel (Eds.) (1998). Reading Science:Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, 3-14. London & New York:Routledge.
Mayer, R. E. (1993). The instructive metaphor:Metaphoric aids to students` understanding of science. In A. Ortony (ed.) (1993). Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Edition, 561-578. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press
Myers, Greg (1991). Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science texts, Discourse Processes, 14(1):1-26.
------ (1994). Making a discovery:Narratives of split genes. In C. Nash (Ed.). (1994). Narrative in Culture:The Uses of Storytelling in the Sciences, Philosophy, and Literature, 2nd Edition, 102-126. London & New York:Routledge.
Mulkay, M (1991). Sociology of Science. Milton Keynes, Philadelphia:Open University Press.
Nelkin, D. (1987). Selling Science:How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York:W H Freeman & Co.
Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor, language, and thought. In A. Ortony (ed.) (1993). Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Edition, 1-16. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Petrie, H. G. & R. S. Oshlag (1993). Metaphor and learning. In A. Ortony (ed.) (1993). Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Edition, 579-609. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Pollack, R. (1994). Signs of Life:The Language and Meanings of DNA. 楊玉齡 譯 周成功 審訂 (1997):《DNA的語言:給下一輪太平盛世的基因備忘錄》。台北:天下文化。
Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality. London, Thousand, New Delhi:SAGE.
Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the News:A Social History of American Newspapers. 何穎怡 譯 (1993):《探索新聞》。台北:遠流。
Schutz, A. ([1962],1990). On multiple realities, Collected Paper Vol.1:The Problems of Social Reality,207-259. M. Natanson ed Dordrecht /Boston/ London:Kluwer Academic Publishers. 盧嵐蘭 譯 (1992):〈多重現實〉,《舒茲論文集(第一冊)》:235-287。台北:桂冠。
Science (1998). C. elegans:Sequence to Biology,Science 282,11 December 1998,1972-1974,2012-2045。
Starr, C. & R.Taggart (1992). Biology:the Unity and Diversity of Life. Belmont:Wadsworth.
White, R. M. (1996). The impossibility of metaphorical senses, The Structure of Metaphor, 169-203. Oxford:Blackwell Publishers. |