English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51719077      Online Users : 656
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84167


    Title: 專利資訊揭露與權利範圍之界定—以權利公示與公信的角度開展
    Other Titles: Patent Disclosure and Scope of Claims—A Study in Terms of Public Notice and Possession
    Authors: 沈宗倫
    Contributors: 法律學系
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2016-04-12 15:40:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 專利有別傳統物權，為一無體財產權。由於權利屬性使然，專利所保護的技術內容常具 有「非敵對性」與「無耗竭性」，權利邊界不易測定，不僅弱化專利權人行使權利的正 當性，更衝擊公眾對於專利權範圍的信賴，影響交易安全與對於專利的合法實施。為解 決上述的問題，本計畫嘗試以專利資訊揭露為核心，本於權利公示與公信的法理，討論 專利資訊揭露與專利權利範圍的關係。在專利公示的法理下，本計畫將以比較法的方法 深入檢討「申請專利範圍」的「明確性」與「專利說明書」的「得據以實施」或「可實 施性」。同時，本計畫亦就美國專利法下的「書面說明」要件，研究其於我國專利法體 系下的可行性。另外，在專利公信的法理下，本計畫以前述「得據以實施」或「可實施 性」的概念，作為調節權利的樞紐，此構想將實踐於專利侵害與新穎性的判斷。
    Patents, different from traditional properties, are intangible. Such attribution leads to the phenomena that the inventions protected by patents are non-rivalrous and inexhaustible. As a consequence, the unpredictability of patents does not only weaken the justification of exclusive rights under patent law, but also impact the secure transactions and embodying the inventions. In order to resolve the aforesaid hardship, this project, under the jurisprudence of “public notice” and “possession” attempts to probe into the relation between patent disclosures and the scope of patents. The concept of “public notice” will bring the project to study the issues of “definiteness” of claims and “enablement” of specification. The requirement of “written description” established under U.S. patent law is also examined in this project to check whether it is necessary to achieve the goal of sufficient patent disclosures under Taiwanese patent system. Additionally, this project will follow the concept of “possession” to study whether “enablement” should function as impetus to measure the reasonable scope of patents.
    Relation: 計畫編號 NSC101-2410-H004-036
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101-2410-H004-036.pdf4154KbAdobe PDF2288View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback