政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/83877
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51831409      Online Users : 510
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83877


    Title: 國民小學教師課程決定權取向及其參與意願之研究
    Authors: 游淑燕
    Contributors: 黃國彥
    黃光雄
    游淑燕
    Date: 1993
    Issue Date: 2016-04-01 17:15:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 一、研究目的
    Reference: 王文科(民78):課程發展與民主。載於中國教學會主編:民主法治與教育。台北:台 灣書店。
    王亞權(民77):九年國民教育有關法令及課程標準嚴定經過及回顧。載於中國教育學會主編：九年國民教育實施二十周年紀念文集，頁81-103。台北:台灣書店。
    王家通(民79):中日中小學課程比較研究。中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁95-114。台北:師大師苑。
    王淑俐(民78):教室中的主人─老師:論我國教師的課程決定權。國教世紀，二月，頁22-25。
    王麗雲(民79):艾波教育思想之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    方炳林(民72):小學課程發展。台北:正中書局。
    司 琦(民69):近三十年來我國國民教育課程之演進。教育資料集刊，第五輯，頁159-223。
    司 琦(民78):課程導論。台北：五南出版圖書公司。
    司 琦編著(民60):小學課程演進。台北:正中書局。
    台灣省政府(民62):省公報。秋字，第61期，頁13。中興新村:台灣省政府。
    台灣省國民學校教師研習會(民78):第九次國民小學課程標準修訂意見調查報告。台北:台灣省國民學校教師研習會。
    吳 鼎(民55):各國小學課程比較研究。台北:黎明文化出版公司。
    吳 鼎(民63):中西課程理論基礎。載於中國教育學會主編:課程研究。台北:商務印書館。
    吳 鼎(民66):近五十年來中國課程之演進。載於中國教育學會主編:近五十年來之中國教育。台北:復興書局。
    吳文侃、楊漢清(民81):比較教育學。台北：五南書局。
    吳貞祥譯(民65):日本現行小學課程修訂經過。台北:國民學校教師研習會。
    吳清山(民78):課程決定的理論探討。政大教育心理學研究，第12期，頁199-229。
    吳清基(民73):教育行政決定的概念分析─重要性、意義與性質。中等教育，第44期。
    吳清基(民79a):我國中小學課程標準修訂的理念與作法。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁67-94。台北:台灣書店。
    吳清基(民79b):教師與進修。台北：師大書苑。
    宋明順(民78):日本教科書研究。載於中華民國比較教育學會編：各國教科書比較研究，頁343-369。台北:台灣書店。
    何清欽(民71):教師參與學校經營之探討。教育學刊，第四期，頁1-38。
    李園會(民78):戰後日本教科書制度的改革。載於中華民國比較教育學會編:各國教科書比較研究，頁299-324。台北:台灣書店。
    周淑卿(民81):英國國定課程之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    林玉體(民77):台灣教育面貌四十年。台北:自立晚報。
    林彩釉(民78):國民中學教師專業自主性之研究。師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    林清江(民77):英國新教育改革方案的啟示。中央日報，九月二十八日。
    林貴美(民79a):法國教科書編輯的基本概念與評鑑要點。載於中華民國比較教育學會編:各國教科書比較研究，頁413-455。台北:台灣書店。
    林貴美(民79b):法國小學課程探討。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁265-306。台北:師大書苑。
    林貴美(民80):法國教育制度。台北:國立編譯館。
    林進財(民81):主要國家的小學課程實施與改革趨勢。比較教育資訊，第二十八期，頁6-16。
    林寶山譯(民73):國家在危機之中─美國教育的改革計劃。高雄:復文書局。
    林寶山(民74):教育決策與改革。高雄:復文書局。
    邱武科(民81):生活與倫理革新課程實施之研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    邱錦昌(民80):教育視導之理論與實際。台北:五南圖書出版。
    高新建(民80):國小教師課程決定之研究。師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    徐緝昌(民65):參與管理之研究。政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
    逸 心(民81):國小教師在教學層面的課程決定實施。現代教育，第七卷，第二十五期，頁152-158。
    郭文景(民74):國中教師參與決定與工程滿足。高雄師範學院碩士論文。
    黃光雄(民73):課程設計的模式。載於編輯小組編:中國教育的展望，頁287-314。台北:五南書局。
    黃光雄(民76):懸缺課程，現代教育，第二卷第一期，頁160-162。
    黃光雄編(民79a):教育概論。台北:師大書苑。
    黃光雄(民79b):英國國定課程評析。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁379-399。台北:師大書苑。
    黃昆輝(民77):教育行政。台北:文景書局。
    黃政傑(民77):教育理想的追求。台北:心理出版社。
    黃政傑(民78):課程改革。台北:漢文書店。
    黃政傑(民79):課程，頁341-363。載於黃光雄主編:教育概論。台北：師大書苑。
    黃政傑(民80a):課程設計。台北:東華書店。
    黃政傑(民80b):教育理念革新。台北:心理出版社。
    黃炳煌(民75):課程理論之基礎。台北:文景書局。
    黃炳煌(民78):教育與現代化。台北:文景書局。
    黃炳煌(民79a):開放社會的課程政設計與教科書用書制度。載於中國教育學會主編:開放社會的教育政策，頁423-445。台北:台灣書店
    黃炳煌(民76b):教育理念與理想。台北:文景書局。
    黃炳煌、簡礎英、羅文基(民77):技職教育課程發展模式之研究。政治大學教育研究所。
    黃振隆(民69):世界主要國家小學課程之比較研究。載於中國比較教育學會編:世界初等教育改革動向。台北:幼獅書店。
    消費者文教基金會(民73):國中、國小學生參考書評鑑報告。教育資料文摘，78期，頁93-98。
    張玉成(民81):英國小學社會科課程之分析。台北:三民書局。
    張承烈(民78):美國中小學教科書之現況。台灣教育，468期頁19-23。
    張柔慧、黃也瑜(民77):教科書中也有(女權運動)─從另一個角度談男女平等。國立編譯館通訊，第一卷第二期，頁32-37。
    教育部國民教育司(民78):國民小學課程標準。台北:正中書局。
    教育部(民80):中華民國國教育統計。台北教育部。
    教育資料文摘(民78):國小課程標準早已不合時宜。教育資料文摘，第135期，頁107-111。
    教育資料文摘(民80a):國中課程修訂可能延後實施。教育資料文摘，第157期，頁185-193。
    教育資料文摘(民80b):布希選宣布推行復興美國的教育計畫。教育資料文摘，第160期，頁4-6。
    教育資料文摘(民80c):「木蘭從軍」教材引起爭議。教育資訊文摘，第163期，頁113-116。
    陳奎熹(民69):教育社會學。台北:三民書局。
    陳奎熹(民79):教育社會研究譯。台北:師大書苑。
    陳添球(民78):國民小學教師教學自主性之研究─國民小學日常生活世界之探討。私立東吳大學社會研究所碩士論文。
    陳麗華(民79):校長在課程改革中的任務。現代教育，第四卷，第十八期，頁40-49。
    單文經(民81):課程與教學研究。台北：師大書苑。
    游淑燕(民81):教師在課程行政決定模式中的潛在角色形象。嘉義師範學院學報，第六期，頁445-468。
    詹棟樑(民78):教科書與意識型態，頁1-37。中華民國比較教育協會主編:各國教科書比較研究。台北:台灣書店。
    曾燦燈(民74a):1983年以後美國教育改革的新發展。比較教育通訊。第十期，頁30-35。
    楊國樞(民76):緒論─人文及社會科學研究的台灣經驗，頁14-15。載於賴澤涵主編:三十年來我國人文及社會科學之回顧與展望。台北:東大書局。
    歐用生(民74):我國國民小學社會科教科書意識型態之分析。新竹師範師專學報，第12期，頁91-125。
    歐用生(民76):初等教育的問題與改革。台北:南宏圖書公司。
    歐用生(民77):教科書政策自由化的途徑。中國論壇，第312期，頁21-23。
    歐用生(民78):社會科教學研究。台北:師大書苑。
    歐用生(民79):課程發展的基本原理。台北:復文書局。
    歐用生(民81):開放社會的教育改革。台北:心理出版社。
    熊先舉(民77):國民中學教科書的編印。載於中國教育學會編：九年國民教育實施二十周年紀念文集。台北:台灣書店。
    廖春文(民79):英國一九八八年教育改革法案對我國中小學課程發展的啟示。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:各國中小學課程比較研究，頁347-377。台北:師大書苑。
    趙起楊(民80):國小教育實習。台北:五南書局。
    蔡清華(民75):從法國初等及中等教育改革趨勢展望我國出等級中等教育之革新。載於中華民國比較教育學會主編:教育改革親的趨勢與展望。台北:台灣書店。
    劉定霖(民78):政治意識型態與國民中學公民與道德教材之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    鄭照順(民79):國中教師專業社會化之研究。高雄:復文書局。
    盧素碧(民74):幼教課程理論與實際。台北:文景書局。
    謝文全(民74):教育行政論文集。台北:文景書局。
    鍾啟泉(民80):現代課程論。台北:五南圖書出版公司。
    鍾清漢(民78):日本教科書審定制度。台灣教育，第468期，頁35-45。
    顏火龍(民74):台北市立國民小學教師參與學校行政意願之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
    簡良平(民80):國小教科書中「漢族中心」意識型態之批判。現代教育，第六卷第四期，頁153-162。
    魏明通(民77):英國的課程改革。台灣教育，第445期，頁26-28。
    簡楚瑛(民70):我國課程發展模式之初探。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    羅善保(民78):英國中小學教科書的編寫與出版。台灣教育，第468期，頁1-10。



    Acker, Sandra(1991). Teacher relationships and educational reform in England and Waies. The Curriculum Journal, 12(3), 301-316.
    Alutto, J. A. & Belasco, J.A. (1972). Patterns of teacher participation in school system decision-making. Educational Adminstration Quarterly, 9(1),Winter, 27-41.
    Anukam, Iheanacho Longinus(1980). Professional Autonomy among Professional /Specialists in Educational Bureaucracy. University of Oregon.
    Apple, Michael W.(1985). Education and Power. N.Y.: Routledge and Kagan Paul Inc.
    Apple, Michael W.(1988). Social crisis and curriculum accords. Educational Theory,38(2), 191-201.
    Apple, Michael W. (1991a). Is Participation enough? Gender, teaching and technology in the classroom. Curriculum Perspective, 11(2),1-13.
    Apple, Michael W. (1991b). The politics of curriculum and teaching. NASSP Bulletin, February, 39-50.
    Apple, Michael W. & Teitelbaum, Kenneth(1986). Are teachers losing control of their skills and curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies,18(2)., 177-184.
    Ball, D. L. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using Textbooks and Teacher’s Curriculum Inquiry, 19(4), 401-423.
    Baller, E. (1991). Hungary. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 233-235. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Barnes, Douglas(1985). Practical Curriculum Study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Bateman, Donald R.(1974). The politics of curriculum. In Willam Pinar (ed.) Heighteded Consciousness, 54-68. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corportaion.
    Bayona, Ellias L. M., Varter, David S. G. & Pubch, Keith F. (199). The Role of Teachers in Curriculum Development. Curriculum Perspectives, 10(4),9-19.
    Beane, James A., Toepfer, Conrad F. & Alessi, Samuel J.(1986). Curriculum Planning and Development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
    Beauchamp, C.(1975). Curriculum Theory. Wilmette, Ill:Kagg Press.
    Bestor, Arthur(1956). The Restoration of Leaming. New York: Knopf.
    Bezzina, Michael (1991). Teachers Perceptions of their participation in school-Based curriculum development: a case study. Curriculum Perspectives, 11(2), 39-47.
    Bobbit, Franklin(1918). The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Boyd, William Lowe(1978). The changing politics of curriculum policy making for American schools. Review of Educational Research, 48(1),577-628.
    Bradley, Leo. H. (1985). Curriculum Leadership and Development Handbook. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
    Campbell, Jim.(1989). The Education Reform Act 1988: some implications for curriculum decision-making in primary school. In Margaret Preedy (ed.) Approaches to Curriculum management, 62-77. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
    Campbell, R.J.(1985). Developing the Primary School Curriculum London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Carson, Alan Scott(1980). Control of the Curriculum and the Competence of the Teachers. British Thesis. University of London.
    Carson, Alan Scott(1984). Control of the Curriculum: a case for teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1), 19-28.
    Caswell, H. L. & Campbell, D.S. (1935). Curriculum Development. N.Y. : American Book.
    Clark, Richard W. (1988). Who decides? The basic Policy Issue. In Tanner, Laurel N. (ed.) Critical Issues in Curriculum, 175-204. Chicago: The University Press of Chicago Press.
    Cohen, D. (1982). Curriculum Decision Making: School-Based In The International Encyclopedia of Education, 1157-1160.
    Cohen, D. (1991). Australia, In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 226-228. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Cohen, D.& Harrison, Marelle (1982). Curriculum Action Project: A Report of Curriculum Decision-Making in Ausrtalia Secondary Schools. Australia Curriculum Development Center. ED 229843.
    Cohen, Marilyn M. , Kottamp. Robert B. & Provenzo, Eugene F. (1986). To Be a Teacher. Cases, Concepts, Observation Guides. New York: Random House.
    Commonn, Dianne L., Egan, Kieran(1988). The missing soul of models of curriculum implementation –educational theory, Curriculum Perspective, 8(1), 1-10.
    Connelly, F. Michael & Ben-Peretz, Miriam(1980). Teachers roles in the using and doing of research and curriculum development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12(2), 95-107.
    Corwin, R. G. (1965). A Sociology of Education. The Ohio State University: Medredith Publishing Company.
    Cox, Theo; Evans, Jane & Sanders, Susan(1991). How primary school teachers view the national curriculum in one Lea. Educational Review, 43(3),
    Cox, Theo, Evans, Jane & Sanders, Susan(1992). How primary school teachers view the national curriculum 1 year on. Educational Review, 44(1)., 19-29.
    Creighton, Helen(1983). Analyzing policy development in curriculum 22(2), 121-136.
    David, K. (1977). Human Relation at Work: Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    David, Martin R. (1990). The English National Curriculum: a landmark in educational reform. Educational Leadership, February,28-29
    Doll, Ronald C.(1988). Curriculum improvement: Decision Making and Process. Boston: Ally and bacon.
    Doll, Ronald C.(1992). Curriculum improvement: Decision Making and Process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Duffy, Gerald G., Roehler, Laura R. & Putnam, Joyce(1987). Putting the teacher in control: basal reading textbook and instructional decision making. Elementary School Journal, 3,257-366.

    Duke, Daniel L., Showers, Beverly K. & Imber, Michael(1980). Teachers as School Decision Maker. Stanford University.
    Eggleston, John(1977). The Sociology of School Curriculum. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul Ltd.
    Eicher, J.C. (1988). France. In T. Neville Postlethwaite (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education, 267-277. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Eisner, E. W. (1985). The Educational Imagination. New York: Macmillan.
    Elbaz, F. (1991). Teacher participation in curriculum development. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum,365-367. Oxford:Pergamon Press.
    Feir, Robert E. (1984). Curriculum Politics: Approaching 1984. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the America Educational Research Association. ED244359.
    Frey, Malliou; Langeheine, Rolf & Gillian Horton-Kruger(1991). Studies of the Quality of the Curricular Proces in the Curriculum Conference. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(1), 36-61.
    Glatthorn, Allan A. (1987). Curriculum Leadership. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.
    Good, C. V. (1973). A Dictionary of Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Goodlad, J. I. (1979). Curriculum Inquiry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Gordon(1978). Role of the teacher. In Denis Lawton, Peter Gordon, Maggie Ing, Bill Gibby, Richard Pring and Terry moore(ed.) Theory and Practice of Curriculum Studies, 219-225. London: Routledge & Kegan paul.
    Grant, S. G. (1991). The California History-Social Science framework: A study in the de-professionalization of teacher. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 6(3), 213-221.
    Griffin, G. A. (1979). Level of curricular decision-making In Goodlad. Curriculum Inquiry,77-99. New York: McGaw-Hill.
    Grossman, Pamela L., Wilson, Suzanne & Shulman, Lee S. (1989). Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In Maynard C. Reynold (ed.) Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher, 23-36. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Haertel, G. D.(1991). Cognitive psychology and curriculum, 110-114. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum. Oxford: pergamon Press.
    Haertel, G. D. (1991). Cognitive Psychology and curriculum, 110-114. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Hashisako, Kazuyuki(1990). Personal and social education in Japan: recent curriculum changes in context. Compare, 20(2), 163-178.
    Hawthorne, Rebecca Killen(1987). Classroom Curriculum: Balancing Autonomy and Obligation. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. ED280849.
    Hawthorne, Richard D. (1990). Analysing school-based collaborative curriculum decision making. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5(3), 279-286.
    Hawthorne, Richard D.& Phillips, J. Arch(1978). Political Dimensions of Currivulum Decision-making. Educational Leadership, 35, 362-366.
    Hopper, I. R. (1971). The Curriculum. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
    Hutchins, Robert M.(1936). The Higher Learning in America. New Haven: Johnson, M. (1967). Definitions and models in curriculum theory. Educational Theory,17(April), 127-140.
    Johnston, Sue(1989). Towards and understanding of the values issue in curriculum decision making. In M. Skilbeck & M. Golby (eds.) Policies for the Curriculum, 228-236. London: The Open University.
    Johnson, Sun (1990). Understanding curriculum decision-making through teacher images. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(5),463-471.
    Kanaya, T. (1988). Japan. In T. Neville Postlethwait (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education, 403-407.
    Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Meausrement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology,67,341-349.
    Kelly, A. V. (1980). Curriculum Context. Cambridge: Harper & Row, Publisher.
    Kelly, A. V. (1989). The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
    Kenny, Kerry J. (1992). School-based curriculum development as a policy option for the 1990s: an Australian perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,7(2), 180-195.
    Kimpston, R. D.(1985). Curriculum fidelity and the implementation tasks emploved by teacher: a research study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(2),186-195.
    Kimpston, R. D. & Anderson, Douglas H. (1982). A study to analysis curriculum decision making in chool district. Educational Ledership, 63-66.
    Kirk, Gordon(1992). The Growth of central influence on the curriculum. In Moore, Rob & Ozga, Jenny(eds.) Curriculum Policy, 17-38. Oxford: Pergamon press.
    Kirst, Michael W. & Walker, Decker F. (1971). An analysis of curriculum policy-making. Review of Educational Research, 41(5), 479-509.
    Knoop, Robert & O’Reilly, Robert(1975). Participative Decision Making in Curriculum. Ed 10284.
    Kobayashi, Victor(1985). Japan. In Torsten Husen & T. Neville Postlethawaite (eds). The International Encyclopedia of Education Research, 696-704. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Kwong, Julia(1985). Changing political culuture and changing curriculum: an analysis of language textbooks in the People of Republic of China. Comparative Education, 21(2)., 197-208.
    Kyle, Diane Wells(1980). Curriculum Decisions: Who Decides what? The Elementary School Journal, 2, 77-85.
    Lawn, Martin(1987). The spur and the bride: Changing the mode of curriculum control. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(3), 227-336.
    Leithwood, K.A., Ross, John A. & Montgomery, Deborah(1982). An Investigation of teacher’s curriculum decision making. In Kenneth A. Leithwood (ed.) Studies in Curriculum Decision Making, 14-26. Ontario : OISE Press.
    Lindbald, Sverker (1986). The practice of school-centered innovation: a Swedish Case. In Taylor, Philip H. (ed.) Recent Development in Curriculum Studies, 193-204. Philadephia: Neer-Nelson.
    Lodahl, T. M. & Kejner(1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
    Lortie, Dan C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
    MacDonald, J. B. (1971). Responsible curriculum development. In Eisner (Ed.). Confronting Curriculum Reform. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
    Mann, John S. (1974). Political Power and the high school curriculum. In Eiilot W. Eisner and Elizabeth Vallance (ed.). Conflicting Conceptions of Curriculum, 147-153.
    Marsh, Colin, Day, Christopher, hannay, Lynne & McCutcheon, Gail (1990). Reconceptualizing School-Based Curriculum Development. London: The Falmer Press.
    Marsh, Colin & Huberman, michae(1984). Disseminating curriculum: A look from top down. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(1),53-66.
    Marsh, Colin & Stafford, Ken(1988). Curriculum: Practice and Issues. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    Martin, D. S., Saif, P.S. & Thiel, L.(1987). Curriculum development: Who is involved and how? Educational Leadership, January, 40-47.
    McKenzie, J.D.S.(1983). Politics and school curriculum. In W.J.D. Minogue(ed.) Adventures in Curriculum, 20-34. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.
    McKenztie, P. (1988). Australia. In T. Neville Postlethwaite(ed.) The Encyclopedia of Comparative Education and National Systems of Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    McKernan, James(1991). Curriculum Acction Research: A Handbook of methods and Resources for the Reflective Practioner. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    McNeil, John D. (1976). Designing Curriculum: Self- Instructional Modules. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
    McNeil, John D. (1985). Curriculum: A Comprehensive Introduction. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
    McNeil, John D. (1990). Curriculum: A Comprehensive Introduction. Illionis:A Division fo Scott, Foreman and Company.

    Mehlinger, Howard D. (1991). The national commission on social studies in the schools:an example of the politics of curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(5), 449-456.
    Miller, T. W. & DHand, H. (1973). The Classroom Teacher as Curriculum developer for Project Candada West. Saskatoon: Saskatchewan Teachers’ Federation.
    Mitchell, T. R. (1973). Motivation and participation: An integration. Academy of Management Journal, 16(4), 670-679.
    Moon, Bob(1989). Who’s in control? Pressure group politics and curriculum change. In M. Skilbeck & M. Golby (eds.) Policies for the Curriculum, 220-227. London: The Open University.
    Neagley, Ross L. & Evans, N. Dean(1967). Handbook for Effective Curriculum Development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    Nicholls, A. & Nicholls, S. H. (1983). Development a Curriculum: A Pracitce Gudie. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.
    Oberg, A. A. (1991). Curriculum decisions. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 302-303. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Oliva, Peter F. (1988). Developing the Curriculum. London: Scott, Foresman and Company.
    Oliva, Peter F. (1988). Developing the Curriculum. London: Scott, Foresman and Company.
    Oliver., Albert l. (1977). Curriculum Improvement: A Guide to Problems, Priciples and Process. New York: Harper, Row, Publishers.
    Orden, A. De La (1991). Spain. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 239-240. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Ornstein, Alln C. & hunkins, Francis(1988). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood, Cliffs.
    Phenix,P.P.(1962). The Disciplices as curriculum content. In A. Harry Passow (ed.) Curriculum Crossroads. N. Y.: Teacher College Press.
    Pickett, Faye David(1979). The Development and Evaluation of a Teacher-Oriented Curriculum Development Process. A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School Memphis State University.
    Piper, Kevin(1989). National curriculum: prospects and possibilities. Curriculum Perspectives, September, 3-7.
    Ponder, A. A. & Bulock, J.W. (1976). Friction point rating: A blueprint for selective decentralization in school system. The Canadian Administator, 15(6), 1-6.
    Popham, W.J.(1969). Instructional Objectives. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Popham, W.J.(1975). Validated instructional materials as the focus of an effective curriculum. In Schaffarzick & Hampson (Eds.) Strategies for Curriculum Development, 89-103.
    Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum: Design and Development. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Saleh, S.D.& Hosek, J.(1976). Job involvement: Concepts and measurement. Academy, 19,213-226.
    Samples, Bob(1984). Reflections on curriculum, teachers and teaching. Educational leadership, April,64-67.
    Saylor, J.G. & Alexander, William M.(1966). Curriculum Planning for modern Schools. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Saylor, J.G. & Alexander, William M.(1974). Planning Curriculum for Schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Saylor, J.G, Alexander, William M., Lewis, Arthur J.(1981). Curriculum Panning for Better teaching and learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Saylor, J.G, Alexander, William M., Lewis, Arthur J.(1981). Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Schiro, M. (1978). Curriculum for Better Schools. N. J.: Educational Techology.
    Schmidt, William H., Porter, Andrew C., Floden, Robert E., Freeman. Donald J., & Schwille, John R. (1987). Four patterns of teacher content decision-making. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(5)5, 493-455.
    Schubert, William H. (1986). Curriculum :Perspective, Paradigm and Possibility. New York: Macmillian Company.
    Shipman, Marten(1985). Local education authorities and the curriculum. In Peter Raggeatt & Gaby Weiner(eds.) Curriculum and Assement:Some Policy Issues. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Short, E. C. (1991). Curriculum design: a wider perspective for today and tomorrow. NASSP Bulletin, Fubrauary, 27-37.
    Simpson, Mary(1989). School base and centrally directed curriculum development—the uneasy middle ground. In M. Skilbeck & M. Golby (eds.) Policies for the Curriculum,257-268. London: The Open University.
    Skilbeck, M (1984). School-Based Curriculum Development. Harper and Row, London.
    Skilbeck, M. (1991). Econmic, Social , and cltural fctor. In Lewy, Arieh (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Curriculum, 122-125. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Smith, B.O., Stanley, W. O. & Shores, J. H. (1975). Fundamentals of Curriculum Development. New York: Harcourt Beace Jovanovich.
    South, O. (1975). School-Base-Management. Mimeographed. Tallahassss:Florida Deaprtmet of Education.
    Stenhouse, L.(1975). An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heimemann.

    Stevenson, Harold W. (1991). Japanese Elementary School Edcation. The Elementary School Journal, 92(1), 109-120.
    Taba, Hida (1962). Curriculum Development. New York: Harcourt, Barace & World, Inc.
    Tankard, George G. (1974). Curriculum Improvement: An Adminstrator’s Guide. New York: Parker Publishing Company, Inc.
    Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum Development. New York: Macmillan
    Tyler, R. W.(1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Unruh, Glenys G. & Unruh, Adolph(1984). Curriculum Development: Problems, Processes and Progress. California:McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
    Walker, Decker (1990). Fundamentals of Curriculum. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers.
    Wheeler, D. K. (1967). Curriculum Process. London: University of London Press.
    White, Paula A. (1992). Teacher Empowerment under ‘ideal’ School-site autonomy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82.
    Wilde, Sandra(1990). Teacher autonomy and nonsexist curriculum: case studies from two rural schools. Cumiculum Inquiry, 20(1),41-62.
    Wiles, Jon & Bondi, Joseph(1989). Curriculum Development: A Guide to practice. Golumbus: Merrill Publishing Company.
    Williamson, John & Fraser, Barry(1991). Elementary Education in Australia. The Elementary School Journal, 92(1), 5-21.
    Willis, George(1990). Assumptions underlying curriculum decisions in Australia: An American perspective. Curriculum Perspective, August, 1-13.
    Wilkson, L. C. (1990). Educational Reform in the U.S.: Impact at the Nation, State & Local Levels. 板橋教師研習會：七十九學年度國小課程研究學術研討會專輯。
    Wood, George H.(1988). Democracy and the curriculum. In Landon E. Beyer & Michael W. Apple (eds.) The Curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities, 166-187. New York: State University of New York Press.
    Yinger, Robert(1980). A study of teacher planning. Elementary School Journal, 80(3), 107-127.
    Young,J. H. (1977). The Curriculum Decision Making Preferences of School personnel. Emontion Alta.: The University of Alberta.
    Young, J. H.(1979a). The curriculum Decision-making prefetnces ofo school personnel. Alberta Journal of Educationa Research, 25(1), 20-29.
    Young, J. H. (1979b). Teacher participation in curriculum decision making: An organization dilemma. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 113-127.
    Young, J. H. (1985). Participation in curriculum development: an inquiry into the response of teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(4),384-414.
    Young, J. H. (1988). Teacher Participation in curriculum development: What status does it have? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3(2), 109-121.
    Young, J. H. (1989). Teacher interest in curriculum committees: What factors are involved? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4), 363-376.
    Yuki, G. A. (1981). Leadership in Organizations.　台北：華泰書局。
    Zahorik, J.A. (1975). Teacher s planning model. Educational leadership, 22,134-139.
    Zais, Robert S. (1976). Curriculum: Principle and Foundation. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002000154
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Education] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2234View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML2312View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback