English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51641804      Online Users : 508
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 中國文學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/79077


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79077


    Title: 論「嚴羽劉辰翁詩論並稱」的基礎、背景和意義
    Authors: 陳英傑
    Chen, Ying-Chieh
    Contributors: 中文系
    Keywords: 嚴羽;劉辰翁;明代復古派;詩法類著作;審美特質
    Yan Yu;Liu Chenweng;revivalists in the Ming dynasty;writings on Shifa 詩法;the aesthetic quality of poetry
    Date: 2015-06
    Issue Date: 2015-10-27 17:59:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 明代中葉以後的詩學史上，出現了一種「嚴羽劉辰翁詩論並稱」的觀點。這種觀點，主要屬於復古派的建構，也透露其所承受的詩學傳統，然而尚未引起當代學者的關注。本文即針對此說的詩學基礎、背景和意義，進行系統化之考察。研究成果顯示：明人提出嚴、劉並稱之說，應是注意到兩人詩論的質性及其價值甚近似。據嚴、劉詩學原典推敲，兩人都認為詩的審美特質，乃是一種辯證超越於語言形式以外的美感，如嚴羽（1195？-1245？）所謂「興趣」，劉辰翁（1232-1297）所謂「不著一字」、「不著相」云云。這可視為兩人並稱之說的基礎。而此說之提出，當是明人緣於自身既有的某種審美觀念，由回溯詩學史而發現契合於嚴、劉，遂能照見其價值。明人觀念係延續了元代以降的詩法類著作，甚至據以作為理解、評價嚴羽詩論的「前理解」。而在此說之成型過程中，高棅（1350-1423）、李東陽（1447-1516）可能扮演了重要推手，也必須留意「傳統評價延續性」、「論述形式互補性」二因素。這可視為兩人並稱之說的背景。立足前述的研究成果，本文最後指出明人此說的兩項重要意義：一是透露明人對嚴、劉所體現的詩學史轉向已有清楚之掌握；其次是顯示宋末元初以迄明代復古派的詩學史，可視為一個連續性整體。
    In Ming dynasty documents, we find passages written by authors with ties to the revivalist movement that juxtapose Yan Yu (1195?-1245?) and Liu Chen-weng (1232-1297). These juxtapositions are comparative in nature, and they show that the revivalist`s view of the poetic tradition was complex and concerned with more than just Yan`s standing and influence. This study discusses the basis, background, and significance of texts that juxtapose Yan and Liu for comparative purposes. It finds that both Yan and Liu maintained that a good poem must manifest aesthetic beauty beyond any form of language. The origin of the Yan-Liu comparison can be found in Gao Bing`s 高棅 (1350-1423) interpretation of the Tangshi pinhui 唐詩品彙. Moreover, the revivalist`s use of Yuan dynasty perspectives to interpret Yan Yu`s poetic theory constitutes the primary background for understanding the Yan-Liu comparisons. The revivalist`s view of poetic history held that Yan and Liu had moved poetry in a new direction and opened a new phase of poetic style in China.
    Relation: 清華中文學報,13,181-227
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國文學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    181-227.pdf1740KbAdobe PDF2558View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback