Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76839
|
Title: | 經濟成長與經濟波動的關係-分量迴歸法之應用 Economic Growth and Volatility - A Quantile Regression Approach |
Authors: | 陳筱婷 |
Contributors: | 林信助 陳筱婷 |
Keywords: | 經濟成長 經濟波動 分量迴歸 結構性改變 Growth Volatility Quantile Regression Structural Change |
Date: | 2015 |
Issue Date: | 2015-07-27 11:18:17 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本文利用分量迴歸方法探討經濟成長和經濟波動間的關係,使用亞洲10個主要經濟體的實質GDP季資料來進行分析。從實證結果發現,大部分國家在大多數分量下產出波動對實質GDP成長率有正向影響,唯有在某些國家當經濟成長率低時產出波動對經濟成長會有負面影響。另外,進一步考慮了產出波動結構性改變因素之後,基本上仍然不會改變波動性對經濟成長率的影響,產出波動變數同樣在大多數國家的大部分分量對GDP成長率有顯著影響,其中高所得國家在高低分量皆為正相關;中低所得國家在低分量下為負相關,高分量下為正相關。此結果顯示,即使在同一個國家資料中,經濟波動的影響也會隨著經濟成長率的高低而有所不同;此外,因為不同國家有不同所得水準,所受到的正、反向影響也會不一樣。 This thesis employs the quantile regression model to investigate the link between economic growth and its volatility, using quarterly real GDP data for ten main Asian economies. Our empirical results show that the output growth volatility positively affects real GDP growth rate at most quantiles for most nations. Only when some countries are at a period of low economic growth, does output volatility negatively affect economic growth. In addition, after considering possible structural breaks in the GDP growth volatility, the relation between volatility and output growth rate stays qualitatively the same. That is, the output volatility still has significant impact on real GDP growth rate at most quantiles for most nations. For high income countries, volatility and economic growth are positively correlated at higher and lower quantiles; while for low and middle income countries, these two factors are negatively correlated at lower quantiles, and positively correlated at higher quantiles. Our empirical evidence indicates that even in the same country, the impact of volatility varies according to the country’s economic growth rate. Besides, due to different income levels, the volatility impact on economic growth rate will differ in different countries. |
Reference: | 中文文獻
方文碩,曾仁清,鄭淑青,2011。大緩和:五個亞洲新興國家證據,經濟與管理論叢 7/1,227-256。
林彥廷,2013 。股票市場與經濟成長領先落後關係之研究:分量迴歸模型的應用,國立東華大學經濟學系碩士論文。
鐘姿菁,2011。台幣匯率與台灣經濟成長的關係-分量迴歸的應用,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
王怡仁,2009。原油價格與美國經濟成長的分量迴歸分析,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
莊智安,2007。公司現金持有與經濟成長-分量迴歸之應用,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
謝君惠,2006。中小企業與經濟成長的關係—分量迴歸的應用,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班碩士論文。
賴慧珊,2011。公共投資與經濟成長:分量迴歸法之應用,臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
蕭宇翔,2011。民主會影響經濟成長嗎?追蹤資料分量迴歸的應用,國立政治大學經濟學系碩士論文。
陳宜君,2009。資訊科技對經濟成長貢獻之探討,世新大學經濟學研究所(含碩專班)碩士論文。
英文文獻
Black, F., 1987. Business Cycles and Equilibrium, Basil Blackwell, New York.
Bernanke, B.S., 1983. Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 85-106. Chowdhury, A. R., 1993. Does Exchange Rate Volatility Depress Trade Flows? Evidence from Error Correction Model, Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 700-706.
Ćorić, B., 2012. The global extent of the great moderation, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74, 493–509.
Fang, W. and Miller, S. M., 2008. The great moderation and the relationship between output growth and its volatility, Southern Economic Journal, 74, 819-838.
Fountas, S. and Karanasos, M., 2006. The relationship between economic growth and real uncertainty in the G3, Economic Modelling, 23, 638-647.
Grier, K. B. and Tullock, G., 1989. An empirical analysis of cross-national economic growth, 1951-80, Journal of Monetary Economics, 24, 259-276.
Inclán, C. and Tiao, G. C., 1994. Use of cumulative sums of squares for retrospective detection of changes of variance, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89,913-923.
Kim, C. J. and Nelson, C. R., 1999. Has the U.S. Economy Become More Stable? A Bayesian Approach Based on a Markov-Switching Model of the Business Cycle, Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 608-616.
Koenker, R. and Bassett, G., 1978. Regression Quantiles, Econometrica, 40, 33-50.
Kormendi, R. and Meguire, P., 1985. Macroeconomic determinants of growth: Cross-country evidence, Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, 141-163.
Lamoureux, C. G. and Lastrapes, W. D., 1990. Persistence in Variance, Structural Change, and the GARCH Model, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8, 225-234.
Martin, P. and Rogers, C.A., 1997. Stabilization Policy, Learning-by-Doing, and Economic Growth, Oxford Economic Papers, 49, 152-166.
Martin, P. and Rogers, C.A., 2000. Long-term Growth and Short-term Economic Instability, European Economic Review, 44 (2), 359–381.
McConnell, M. and Perez-Quiros, G., 2000. Output Fluctuations in the United States: What Has Changed since the Early 1980’s?, American Economic Review, 90, 1464-1476.
Mills, T. C. and Wang, P., 2003. Have output growth rates stabilized? Evidence from the G-7 economies, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 50, 232-246.
Mirman, L., 1971. Uncertainty and optimal consumption decisions, Econometrica, 39, 179-185.
Pozo, S., 1992. Conditional exchange rate variability and the volume of international trade: evidence from the early 1900s, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, 325–29
Pindyck, R. S., 1991. Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment, Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 1110-1148.
Ramey, G. and Ramey, V., 1995. Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth, American Economic Review, 85, 1138–1151
Stock, J. and Watson, M., 2005. Understanding changes in international business cycle dynamics, Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 968–1006. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 國際經營與貿易研究所 102351035 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102351035 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
103501.pdf | 1538Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 85 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|