政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/76560
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51696235      在线人数 : 465
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76560


    题名: 影響台灣企業發布企業社會責任報告書之因素
    Determinants of Publishing Corporate Social Responsibility Reports in Taiwan
    作者: 阮氏紅幸
    贡献者: 蘇威傑
    阮氏紅幸
    关键词: 企業社會責任報告書
    企業社會責任績效
    CEO在位期限
    CEO的MBA學位
    日期: 2015
    上传时间: 2015-07-14 10:30:09 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 台灣金管會在2015年首年「強制」化工、食品、金融業及資本額百億以上逾200家企業需編製企業社會責任報告書。但是，金管會統計，過去採自願性質，主動編製CSR報告書的有200多家上市櫃企業，本研究想探討在政府未針對這個議題做具體的法律要求，甚麼因素會影響這些企業發布CSR報告書。
    以往文獻對於企業社會責任（Corporate Social Responsibility，CSR）之探討，多將焦點在CSR和財務績效之關聯性。而CSR揭露的文獻中，主要探討影響CSR揭露的相關因素，而較少針對CSR報告書決策之前置因素進行研究。故本研究以CSR績效、CEO在位期限及擁有MBA學位的CEO探討影響企業發布CSR報告書決策之因素。
    Clarkson（1995）指出一個企業若主動執行CSR相關政策，即產生卓越的CSR績效，他們將會向利害關係人自願性地揭露環境相關訊息。本研究第一個假設為CSR報告決策與該企業CSR績效有正相關。另外，Finkelstein（2009）認為，CEO在位期間與組織改變有反相關係。因此，本研究的第二個假設為在位期限較久的CEO比起新上任的CEO，較不願意發布CSR報告書。一個企業若其CEO擁有MBA學位相較於其他公司較主動揭露CSR相關訊息（Finkelstein，2009），本研究第三個假設為發布CSR報告書之決策與有MBA學位的CEO正向關係。本研究的研究對象為台灣上市（櫃）在鋼鐵工業、半導體業、資訊服務業及金融服務業等四個產業之企業；收集樣本的時間為2008年至2012年。經過迴歸分析，研究結果顯示，一個企業若其CSR績效越好將會越願意發布CSR報告書，以及CEO的在位期限越長，該企業發布CSR報告書的機率越低；有MBA學位的CEO與發佈CSR報告書之決策並沒有任何關係。企業若想加強發布CSR報告書之決策，必須全面提升CSR績效為優先；同時，在位期限較長的CEO亦須改變自己的想法，影響組織行為，積極推動CSR相關政策 。
    參考文獻: 1. Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management journal, 22(3), 501-515.
    2. Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670. 645-670.
    3. Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. E., & Hughes, K. E. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(5), 447-471.
    4. Belkaoui, A., & Karpik, P. G. (1989). Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2(1).
    5. Bewley, K., & Li, Y. (2000). Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: a voluntary disclosure perspective. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1(1), 201-226.
    6. Bowen, H. R., & Johnson, F. E. (1953). Social Responsibility of the Businessman. Harper.
    7. Campbell, D. (2004). A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companies—a research note. The British Accounting Review, 36(1), 107-117.
    8. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
    9. Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
    10. Chin, M. K., Hambrick, D. C., & Treviño, L. K. (2013). Political Ideologies of CEOs The Influence of Executives’ Values on Corporate Social Responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197-232.
    11. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
    12. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4), 303-327.
    13. Cooper, B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: the Holy Grail. Chartered Secretary, July, 12-16.
    14. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review (pre-1986), 2(3), 70.
    15. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). Institutional pressures and organizational characteristics: implications for environmental strategy. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper, (11-050).
    16. Dye, R. A. (1985). Disclosure of nonproprietary information. Journal of Accounting Research, 123-145.
    17. Felicelli, Meghan (2008). "Route to the Top." Chicago, IL: Spencer Stuart.
    18. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 484-503.
    19. Finkelstein, S., & D`aveni, R. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079-1108.
    20. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management teams, and Boards. Oxford University Press.
    21. Freedman, M., & Wasley, C. (1990). The association between environmental performance and environmental disclosure in annual reports and 10Ks. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3(2), 183-193.
    22. Friedman, M. (1971). Does business have a social responsibility. Bank Administration, 47(4), 13-14.
    23. Gabarro, J. J. (1987). The Dynamics of Taking Charge. Harvard Business Press.
    24. Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2-3), 233-262.
    25. Geletkanycz, M. A., & Black, S. S. (2001). Bound by the past? Experience-based effects on commitment to the strategic status quo. Journal of Management, 27(1), 3-21.
    26. George, E., Chattopadhyay, P., Sitkin, S. B., & Barden, J. (2006). Cognitive underpinnings of institutional persistence and change: A framing perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 347-365.
    27. Golob, U., & Bartlett, J. L. (2007). Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 1-9.
    28. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77.
    29. Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(3‐4), 327-356.
    30. Grunig, J. (1989). Symmetrical presuppositions as a framework for pubiic relations theory/C. Botan, V. Hazelton.
    31. Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1990). Corporate Social Disclosure Practice: A Comparative International Analysis.
    32. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
    33. Hambrick, D. C., & Fukutomi, G. D. (1991). The seasons of a CEO`s tenure. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 719-742.
    34. Holland, L., & Foo, Y. B. (2003). Differences in environmental reporting practices in the UK and the US: the legal and regulatory context. The British Accounting Review, 35(1), 1-18.
    35. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate Communication and Impression Management—New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting (pp. 55-68). Springer Netherlands.
    36. Hopkins, M. (2012). The Planetary Bargain: Corporate Social Responsibility Matters. Routledge.
    37. Hughes, S. B., Anderson, A., & Golden, S. (2001). Corporate environmental disclosures: are they useful in determining environmental performance? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20(3), 217-240.
    38. Idowu, S. O., & Towler, B. A. (2004). A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), 420-437.
    39. Ingram, R. W., & Frazier, K. B. (1980). Environmental performance and corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 614-622.
    40. Jaggi, B., & Zhao, R. (1996). Environmental performance and reporting: perceptions of managers and accounting professionals in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Accounting, 31(3), 333-346.
    41. Johnson, H. L. (1971). Business in Contemporary Society: Framework and Issues. Wadsworth Pub. Co.
    42. Jones, T. M., Indexes, S., Register, E. I., & Socially, M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 22(2).
    43. Keeney, R. L., & Keeney, R. L. (2009). Value-focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. Harvard University Press.
    44. Kolk, A. (2005). Environmental reporting by multinationals from the Triad: convergence or divergence? MIR: Management International Review, 145-166.
    45. Lewis, B. W., Walls, J. L., & Dowell, G. W. (2014). Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 712-722.
    46. Manne, H. G., & Wallich, H. C. (1972). The Modern Corporation and Social Responsibility.
    47. Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1999, August). Learning across the Life Cycle: Experimentation and Performance among the Hollywood Studio Heads. Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1999, No. 1, pp. H1-H6). Academy of Management.
    48. Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471-475.
    49. Patten, C. L., & Glick, B. R. (2002). Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(8), 3795-3801.
    50. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92..
    51. Rahman, A., & Widyasari, K. N. (2008). The analysis of company characteristic influence toward CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence of manufacturing companies listed in JSX. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 12(1), 25-35.
    52. Ramanathan, K. V. (1976). Toward a theory of corporate social accounting. Accounting Review, 516-528.
    53. Schaltegger, S., Müller, K., & Hindrichsen, H. (1996). Corporate Environmental Accounting. Chichester: Wiley.
    54. Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review (pre-1986), 17(3), 58.
    55. Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195-204.
    56. van Staden, C. J., & Hooks, J. (2007). A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness. The British Accounting Review, 39(3), 197-210.
    57. Wally, S., & Baum, J. R. (1994). Personal and structural determinants of the pace of strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 932-956.
    58. Warhurst, A., & Mitchell, P. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and the case of Summitville mine. Resources Policy, 26(2), 91-102.
    59. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1995). Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60-83.
    60. Wiseman, H. (Ed.). (1983). Peacekeeping: Appraisals & Proposals. Pergamon.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    102351048
    103
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1023510481
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    048101.pdf1034KbAdobe PDF2844检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈