English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51814229      Online Users : 309
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/76410
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76410


    Title: 採行IFRS下綜合損益總額、其他綜合損益及其組成項目 之價值攸關性
    The value-relevance of comprehensive income, other comprehensive income and its components under IFRS
    Authors: 張惠雯
    Contributors: 郭弘卿
    張惠雯
    Keywords: 綜合損益
    價值攸關性
    財務報表表達
    Comprehensive income
    Value relevance
    Financial statement presentation
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-07-13 11:05:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在依財務資訊揭露之立意,以Ohlson(1995)評價模型為基礎
    ,探討採行IFRS下,綜合損益相關資訊之價值攸關性;另以採行IFRS前後之期間,探討財務報導格式改變對其他綜合損益資訊價值攸關性之影響。實證結果如下:
    1. 採行IFRS下,綜合損益總額具顯著正向價值攸關性,但與當期損益相較
    ,綜合損益總額並未發現具有較高之相對價值攸關性。
    2. 採行IFRS下,當期其他綜合損益總額具顯著正向增額價值攸關性;其組成項目中,換算對國外子公司之淨投資產生之外幣兌換利得或損失與其他綜合損益項目─其他具顯著負向增額價值攸關性,再衡量備供出售金融資產之利益及損失與採用權益法認列之關聯企業及合資之其他綜合損益份額具顯著正向增額價值攸關性。
    3. 相較於ROC GAAP之報導格式,採行IFRS下,當期其他綜合損益總額及其大部分組成項目更清楚地揭露於綜合損益表,而具較高之增額價值攸關性。
    本研究旨在依財務資訊揭露之立意,以Ohlson(1995)評價模型為基礎
    ,探討採行IFRS下,綜合損益相關資訊之價值攸關性;另以採行IFRS前後之期間,探討財務報導格式改變對其他綜合損益資訊價值攸關性之影響。實證結果如下:
    1. 採行IFRS下,綜合損益總額具顯著正向價值攸關性,但與當期損益相較
    ,綜合損益總額並未發現具有較高之相對價值攸關性。
    2. 採行IFRS下,當期其他綜合損益總額具顯著正向增額價值攸關性;其組成項目中,換算對國外子公司之淨投資產生之外幣兌換利得或損失與其他綜合損益項目─其他具顯著負向增額價值攸關性,再衡量備供出售金融資產之利益及損失與採用權益法認列之關聯企業及合資之其他綜合損益份額具顯著正向增額價值攸關性。
    3. 相較於ROC GAAP之報導格式,採行IFRS下,當期其他綜合損益總額及其大部分組成項目更清楚地揭露於綜合損益表,而具較高之增額價值攸關性。
    Reference: 一、 中文參考文獻
    1. 會計準則公報
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會財務會計準則委員會,2005,財務會計準則公報第14號「外幣換算之會計處理準則」。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會財務會計準則委員會,2005,財務會計準則公報第18號「退休金會計處理準則」。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會財務會計準則委員會,2005,財務會計準則公報第34號「金融商品之會計處理準則」。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會財務會計準則委員會,2006,財務會計準則公報第1號「財務會計觀念架構及財務報表之編製」。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會財務會計準則委員會,2006,財務會計準則公報第35號「資產減損之會計處理準則」。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會財務會計準則委員會,2006,財務會計準則公報第38號「待出售非流動資產及停業單位之會計處理準則」。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會臺灣財務報導準則委員會,2013,財務報導之觀念架構(2013年版)。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會臺灣財務報導準則委員會,2013,國際會計準則公報第1號「財務報表之表達」(2013年版藍本)。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會臺灣財務報導準則委員會,2013,國際會計準則公報第16號「不動產、廠房及設備」(2013年版藍本)。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會臺灣財務報導準則委員會,2013,國際會計準則公報第19號「員工福利」(2013年版藍本)。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會臺灣財務報導準則委員會,2013,國際會計準則公報第21號「匯率變動之影響」(2013年版藍本)。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會臺灣財務報導準則委員會,2013,國際會計準則公報第28號「投資關聯企業及合資」(2013年版藍本)。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會臺灣財務報導準則委員會,2013,國際會計準則公報第38號「無形資產」(2013年版藍本)。
    財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會臺灣財務報導準則委員會,2013,國際會計準則公報第39號「金融工具:認列與衡量」(2013年版藍本)。
    2. 期刊
    李淑華與謝佩蓁,2014,強制適用IFRS轉換期間綜合損益資訊攸關性之研究-以台灣上市櫃公司為例,中華會計學刊,第10卷(2):189-247。
    3. 研討會論文集
    王瑄、葉疏,2010,股價是否充分反映其他綜合損益項目及股權交易之評價內涵,2010會計理論與實務研討會論文集,淡江大學會計學系與中華會計教育學會。
    4. 碩博士論文
    孫幸琪,1994,營業淨利、淨利及綜合淨利於解釋股票報酬有用性之比較-台灣股市之實證研究,國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    陳奕卉,2004,外幣換算調整數價值攸關性之研究,國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    陳怡臻,2014,其他綜合損益之價值攸關性,私立逢甲大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    蕭喻文,2014,我國綜合損益項目之價值攸關性,國立台灣大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    羅夏虹,1999,綜合淨利及其組成項目與股票報酬之關連性,國立中正大學會計系未出版碩士論文。

    二、 英文參考文獻
    Aboody, D. and Lev, B. 1998. The value-relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization. Journal of Accounting Research 36: 161-191.
    Accounting Principles Board. 1966. Opinion no.9: Reporting the results of operations.
    Ahmed, Anwer S., and Takeda, Carolyn. 1995. Stock market valuation of gains and losses on commercial banks` investment securities: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20(2): 207-225.
    Amir, E., and Lev, B. 1996. Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 3-30.
    Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income number. Journal of Accounting Research: 159-178.
    Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., and Landsman, W. R. 1998. Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25: 1-34.
    Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., and Landsman, W. R. 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 77-104.
    Beaver, W. H. 1968. The Information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 6: 67-92.
    Beaver, W. H., R. Clark, and W. F. Wright. 1979. The association between unsystematic security returns and the magnitude of earnings forecast errors. Journal of Accounting Research 17(2): 316-340.
    Bernard, V. 1995. The Feltham-Ohlson framework: Implication for empiricists. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2): 733-747.
    Biddle, G. C., and Choi, J. H. 2006. Is comprehensive income irrelevant? Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics 2(1): 1-32.
    Black, F. 1993. Choosing accounting rules. Accounting Horizons 7: 1-17.
    Brimble, M., and A. Hodgson. 2004. The value relevance of comprehensive income and components for industrial firms. Working paper, Griffith University.
    Cahan S.F., S.M. Courtenay, P.L. Gronewoller, and D.R. Upton. 2000. Value relevance of mandated comprehensive income disclosure. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 27(9-10): 1273-1301.
    Carroll, T., Linsmeier, T. and Petroni, K. 2003. Fair value vs. historical cost accounting: evidence from closed-end mutual funds. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 18(1): 1-23.
    Chambers, D., T. J. Linsmeier, C. Shakespeare, and T. Sougiannis. 2007. An evaluation of SFAS No.130 comprehensive income disclosures. Review of Accounting Studies 12: 557-593.
    Chen, C. H. and Y. C. Chen. 2013. Earnings quality during SFAS-to-IFRS conversion in Taiwan. Taiwan Accounting Review 9(2): 159-190.
    Chen, C. Y. 2003. Investment opportunities and relation between equity value and employees’ bonus. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 30: 941-973.
    Cheng, C., J. Cheung, and V. Gopalakishnan. 1993. On the usefulness of operating income, net income and comprehensive income in explaining security returns. Accounting and Business Research 23: 195-203.
    Collins, D. W., E. L. Maydew, and I. S. Weiss. 1997. Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 39-67.
    Collins, D. W., Pincus and H. Xie. 1999. Equity valuation and negative earnings: the role of book value of equity. The Accounting Review 4(1): 29-61.
    Dechow, P. M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: the role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18(1): 3-42.
    Dehning, B., and P.A. Ratliff. 2004. Comprehensive income: evidence on the effectiveness of SFAS 130. The Journal of American Academy of Business: 228-232.
    Dhaliwal, D., K. R. Subramanyam, and R. Trezevant. 1999. Is comprehensive income superior to net income as a measure of firm performance? Journal of Accounting and Economics 26: 43-67.
    Easton, P. D., and Harris, T. S. 1991. Earnings as an explanatory variable for returns. Journal of Accounting Research 29(1): 19-36.
    Feltham, G., and J. Ohlson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2): 689-731.
    Feltham, G., and J. Ohlson. 1996. Uncertainty resolution and the theory of depreciation measurement. Journal of Accounting Research 34(2): 209-234.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board. 1980. Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 3: Elements of financial statements of business enterprises.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board. 1984. Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 5: Recognition and measurement in financial statements of business enterprises.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board. 1985. Statement of financial accounting concepts no. 6: Elements of financial statements.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board. 1997. Statement of financial accounting concepts no.130: Reporting comprehensive income.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board and International Accounting Standard Board. 2008. Discussion paper-preliminary views on financial statement presentation.
    Goncharov, I. and A.C. Hodgson. 2008. Comprehensive income in Europe: valuation, prediction and conservatism issues. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Serie Economica: 1-10.
    Hair, J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham, and W. Black. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. 6th ed. Prendice-Hall Inc.
    Henock Louis. 2003. The relevance of the foreign translation adjustment. The Accounting Review 78 (4): 1027-1047.
    Hirst, D., and P. Hopkins. 1998. Comprehensive income reporting and analysts’ valuation judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 36: 47-74.
    Holthausen, R. W., and R. L. Watts. 2001. The relevance of the vallie relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 3-75.
    Inchausti, Bg, and Perez, Fp. 2011. Value relevance of the comprehensive income versus net income: a European perspective. Revista Espanola De Financiacion Y Contabilidad-Spanish Journal Of Finance 40(150): 319-350.
    Johnson, L., Reither, C., and Swieringa, R. 1995. Toward reporting comprehensive income. Accounting Horizons 9: 128–137.
    Jones, Da., and Smith, Kj. 2011. Comparing the value relevance, predictive value, and persistence of other comprehensive income and special items. The Accounting Review 86(6): 2047-2073.
    Kanagaretnam K., R. Mathieu, and M. Shehata. 2009. Usefulness of comprehensive income reporting in Canada. Journal Accounting Public Policy 28: 349-365.
    Kozminsky, E. 1977. Altering comprehension: the effect of biasing titles on text comprehension. Memory and Cognition 5(4): 482-490.
    Lin S., O. J. Ramond, and J. Casta. 2007. Value relevance of comprehensive income and its components: evidence from major European capital markets. American Accounting Association, International Accounting Section Mid-Year Conference: 2-3.
    Lipe, M. G., and S. Salterio. 1999. The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of information organization and diversity. Working paper, Indiana University.
    Maines, L., and L. McDaniel. 2000. Effects of comprehensive-income characteristics on nonprofessional investors’ judgments: the role of financial statement presentation format. The Accounting Review 75: 179-207.
    O’Hanlon J. and P. Pope. 1999. The value relevance of U.K. dirty surplus accounting flows. British Accounting Review 31: 459-482.
    Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2): 661-687.
    Petroni, K.R., and Wahlen, J. M. 1995. Fair values of equity and debt securities and share prices of property-liability insurers. Journal of Risk and Insurance 62(4): 719-737.
    Rees, L. L., and P. B. Shane. 2012. Academic research and standard-setting: The case of other comprehensive income. Accounting Horizons 26(4): 789-815.
    Robert Günther. 2015. Value-relevance of other comprehensive income under IFRS. Ph. D. dissertation, University of St. Gallen, Bamberg, Germany.
    Robinson, L. 1991. The time has come to report comprehensive income. Accounting Horizons 5: 107-112.
    Scott, W. R. 2012. Financial accounting theory. 6th ed. Toronto, Canada: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Vuong, Q. H. 1989. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57: 307-333.
    Wang, Y., Buijink, W., and Eken, R. 2006. The value relevance of dirty surplus ac-counting flows in the Netherlands. The International Journal of Accounting 41(4): 387-405.
    Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53(1):112-133.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    102353016
    103
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102353016
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback