Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76147
|
| Title: | 閩南語「e結構」的變調分界
The Tone Sandhi Domain of ";e structure";in Taiwan Southern Min |
| Authors: | 陳郁萱
Chen, Yu Hsuan |
| Contributors: | 蕭宇超
Hsiao, Yuchau E.
陳郁萱
Chen, Yu Hsuan |
| Keywords: | 閩南語
變調分界
優選理論
「e結構」
Taiwan Southern Min
tone sandhi domain
Optimality theory
";e structure" |
| Date: | 2014 |
| Issue Date: | 2015-07-01 14:41:04 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本篇論文以優選理論的觀點分析閩南語中「e結構」的變調分界。討論可以分為兩部分，首先，針對於變調的範疇，研究從句法與音韻的介面關係討論「e結構」的變調分界，結果顯示「e結構」的變調分界以音韻詞組(Phonological Phrase)為範疇。此外，本文也分別討論了代名詞、動補結構、帶有語意焦點的字詞，發現代名詞必須向右附著其後的音韻詞組、動補結構中，動詞會帶有語意焦點，補語則變為輕聲。帶有語意焦點的詞會維持本調，除非是附加語(adjunct)。
探討完變調範疇後，將以優選理論分析。本文提出韻律制約與聲調調制約：韻律制約負責解釋變調範疇的劃分，聲調制約著重於解釋輕聲的運作。針對「e結構」變調分界的劃分，本文以*ADJUNCT]PhP與ALIGN-R(FOC, PhP)，以及結構性制約(Markedness constraint)之間的排序預測，藉以解釋帶有語意焦點的字詞會維持本調，但附加語會變調的情況。另外，本文提出了IDENT-T(FOC) 與UNPARSED-N來限制未被分析(parse)到音韻詞組的聲調會輕聲化。
This thesis is aimed analyzes tone sandhi domain of “e structure” in Taiwan Southern Min from the perspective of Optimality theory. The discussion is divided into two parts. First, this thesis explores the tonal domain in terms of the interface of syntax and phonology. The analysis indicates that the tonal domain of “e structure” is a phonological phrase. Furthermore, this thesis also investigates different types of “e structure” such as pronoun, V-complement structure, and focus words. The analysis indicates pronoun is cliticized rightward to a following phonological phrase; verb is a focus word and has a base tone in V-complement structure, however, complement is neutralized;, and the focus word has a base tone unless it is an adjunct.
Secondly, Optimality Theory is adopted to analyze the data after exploring the tonal domain. Prosodic constraints and tonal constraints are proposed in this thesis. The tonal constraints are responsible for explaining the delimitation of tonal domains. The interaction between *ADJUNCT]PhP, ALIGN-R(FOC, PhP) and other markedness constriant determines that a focus word has a base tone, except when it is an adjunct. Besides, IDENT-T(FOC) and UNPARSED-N predict that a word which is not parsed by phonological phrase is neutralized. |
| Reference: | 英文文獻
Bao, Zhi-ming. 1990. On the Nature of Tone. MIT. PhD. Dissertation.
Bao, Zhi-ming. 1999. The structure of Tone. PhD. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Bao, Zhi-ming. 2003. Tone, accent, and stress in Chinese. Journal of Linguistics 39.1:147-166
Bickmore, Lee S. 1989. Kinyambo Prosody. PhD. Dissertation, UCLA.
Bodmen, N. 1995. Spoken Amoy Hokkien. Kuala Lumpur: Government, Federation of Malaya.
Chen, M. 1987. The Syntax of Xiamen Tone Sandhi. Phonology Yearbook
4:109-150.
Chen, M. 1992. Argument vs. Adjunct: Xiamen Tone Sandhi Revisited. University of California, San Diego. Manuscript.
Chen, M. 1990. What must phonology know about syntax. The Phonology-Syntax Connection. 19-46. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Chen, M. 2000. Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Oxford University Press.
Cheng, R. 1968. Tone Sandhi in Taiwanese. Linguistics 41: 19-42.
Cho, Young-mee Yu. 1990. Syntax and Phrasing in Korean. The Phonology-Syntax Connection. 47-62. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Chung, Ranung-fu. 1989. Aspects of Kejia Phonology. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinoist at Urbana-Champaign.
Hsiao, E. Yuchau. 1991. Syntax, Rhythm and Tone : A Triangular Relationsip. Taipei: Crane.
Hsiao, E. Yuchau. 1995. Southern Min Tone Sandhi and Theories of Prosodic Phonology.Taipei: Student Book Co.
Hsiao, E. Yuchau. 1995. Pronominal Tone Sandhi of Southern Min Spoken in Taiwan：A Perspective of the Interface between Syntax, Semantics and Phonology. Journal of NCCU. Vol. 70.
Hsiao, E. Yuchau. 2000. Focus Alignment in Taiwan Southern Min. Manuscript. National Chengchi University.
Hsiao, E. Yuchau. 2000. Optimal tone sandhi in Taiwan southern Min. Hanyu Yanjiu 18:25-40.[In Chinese]
Hsiao, E. Yuchau and Yunyi Chiu. 2006. Trisyllabic and Tetrasyllabic Tone Sandhi in Dongshi Hakka. Language and Linguistics 7.2:455-482. [In Chinese]
Inkelas, Sharon. 1989. Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. Ph.D. Dissertation. Standard University.
Inkelas, Sharon and Cheryl Zoll. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaisse, Ellen. 1985. Connected Speech: The Interaction of Syntax and Phonology. London: Academic Press
Kanerva, Jonni. 1989. Focus and Phrasing in Chichewa Phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation. Standford University.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2012. Mandarin de ↔ Taiwanese e. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 33:17-40.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2014. Structure of Noun Phrases--Left or Right? Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 1-32. 2.
Lin, Hui-shan. 2000. An Optimality Theoretic approach to tone sandhi in Mandarin, in Taiwanese, and in Mandarin-Taiwanese Code-Mixing. MA Thesis, National Chengchi University.
Lin, Hui-shan. 2005. Prosodic correspondence in tone sandhi. UST Working Papers in Linguistics 1:229-265.
Lin, J. 1995. Lexical Government and Tone Group Formation in Xiamen Chinese. Phonology 11: 237-275.
Lin, Yen-Hwei. 2007. The Sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1993. Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of Morphology 79-153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McCarthy,John J. 2008. Doing Optimality Theory: Applying Theory to Data. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nespor, Marina., and Irene, Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Ou, S. 1996. Southern Min Special Tone Sandhi: A Prosadic-Theoretic Approach. National Chengchi University. M.A. Thesis.
Prince, A., and P. Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Manuscript. Rutgers University.
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation Between Sound and Structure. Cambridge: MIT press.
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1986. On Derived Domain in Sentence Phonology. Phonology
Yearbook 3: 371-405.
Shih, Chilin. 1986. The Prosodic Domain of Tone Sandhi in Chinese. University of California, San Diego. PhD. Dissertation.
Yip, Moria. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, Zheng-sheng. 1988. Tone and Tone Sandhi in Chinese. PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University.
Zwicky, Arnold (1970) Auxiliary reduction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 1, 323-336. Zwicky, Arnold (1977) On Clitics. IULC, Bloomington, Indiana.
中文文獻
林慶勳，(2001)，臺灣閩南語概論。臺北：心理出版社。
邱玉雪，(2004)，閩南語的名詞詞組與變調分界的關係。嘉義：全國語言學論文研討會。
洪惟仁，(1985) ，臺灣河佬語聲調研究。台北：自立晚報社文化出版部。
洪惟仁，(1996) ，閩南語輕聲變化與語法的關係，台北‧董忠司編『台灣閩南語概論』講授資料彙編。頁330-382。台灣語文學會出版。
洪惟仁，(1998) ，閩南語輕聲及其語法、語用分析，黃宣範編『第二屆台灣語言國際研討會論文選集』。頁419-449。文鶴出版公司。
張振興，(1989，1993) ，臺灣閩南方言記略。台北：文史哲出版社。
湯廷池，(1990) ， 國語的雙賓結構。收入《國語語法研究論集》，頁197-225。
湯廷池，(2000) ，漢語的「限定子句」與「非限定子句」，語言暨語言學。第一卷第一期，頁191-214。
歐淑珍、蕭宇超 (1995)，從「韻律音韻學」看台灣閩南語的輕聲現象。台北：台灣師範大學 「第四屆國際暨第十三屆全國聲韻學學術研討會」論文。
董忠司，(2001) ，福爾摩沙的烙印─台灣閩南語概要。台北：文建會。
董忠司，(2002)，台灣(閩南語)語音簡說，收錄於《九十一年度鄉土語言閩南語支援人員職前培訓班講義》，台北：教育部國教司。
鄭良偉，(1994)，教學參考用的台語輕聲規律。新竹清華大學台北；「台灣閩南語母語學術研討 會」論文。曹逢甫、蔡美慧編《台灣閩南語論文集》。頁259-295。
盧廣誠，(2003)，台灣閩南語概要。台北：南天。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
100555010
103 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1005550101 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [語言學研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 010101.pdf | | 1644Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 518 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
